Kind of like "Mad Libs". Here, let's make a list:
Pedophile
Republican
Mentally-handicapped
Actor
Democrat
Doctor
Asian
Serial Killer
Rock star
Now see, the thing about your mad libbing is that by default I shouldn't have a problem with working with any of them. The question that will change whether I have a problem is say, in the case of the mentally handicapped, will he be able to complete his job? If he can do his job, I shouldn't have a problem before getting to know him (unlike your case against homosexuals). With the case of the serial killer, I should have a problem BECAUSE HE COULD KILL ME. The rest of them, probably wouldn't matter.
When you mad libbed, you slipped those 2 in to be sneaky, knowing the others wouldn't really matter in a work enviroment.
Again, this goes against the definition of tolerate vs. like. I'm not invasive about it, but if you're homosexual and throw it in my face demanding recognition, I'm going to be taken aback. I don't like gays, so I don't go out of my way to associate with them. But it's not like you have to fill out an application with your sexual preference on it before I will shake your hand, either.
The problem here is that you are disagreeing with something that isn't being thrown in your face. A comic at an adult comic shop would have to be sought after. Your going against your own words when you posted this.