I would like to address all of your idiocy.
Which thread was this?
By all means do. You'll soon enough find out who the true idiot is (hint: the guy who doesn't understand taxation). It was the thread where you backflipped on your regurgitated FOX talking point about the tax bill from last year, and every single member here absolutely decimated you your (as you called it yourself) idiocy.
I urge everybody here to take a trip down memory lane and remember how truly uneducated this moron is:
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/?id=Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps&exid=thread...complished-massive-tax-reform.2519945/page-61
By Page 68 you just pumped out so much of the misinformed crap that you bright-as-day showed us that you really didn't understand the point you were arguing for (barring of course your constant flip-flopping, which was also hilarious).
I didnt backflip AT ALL. I presented pros and cons to each side. I was opening the topic up for discussion. Please show otherwise.
Mhm.. sure buddy. I'm sure you thought you were 'winning' this discussion too. Refer to thread above in case you had any doubts of your laziness.
And you are a frothing rabid dog who either doesnt really know how to read, cant comprehend, or just an asshat who creates summations that arent supported. Im voting the third option.
Hey buddy, don't project too hard.. it's plainly obvious to us that you don't understand what you're arguing. In the thread above you showed us all how truly clueless you were. This was my favourite quote, where you said you didn't believe in trickledown economics or cutting social services.... but hilariously, throughout the entire thread - despite how many times your numerous misinformed opinions were corrected - you still defended the tax cuts that, surprise, benefited the rich:
You don't grasp the conservative (not GOP) views on taxation unless you're willing to admit govt spending is far beyond what it should be. Now, I know you think the govt should be all things to all people (unless they're wealthy) but I disagree. See my sig regarding redistributing.
And no I don't believe in trickle down economics. That's been proven bunk as you know. But you say "obviously" that must be what I think because you're stuck in progressive thinking and you apparently can't think beyond that.
And when you (unsurprisingly) backtracked on your proposition. Here's one I enjoyed, where you (like a clueless moron) believed the tax cuts should be passed without any reduction in spending (despite us telling you multiple times that Paul Ryan was looking to cut SS and Medicare for this tax cut) before you backflipped only a few posts later:
You, along with other progressive type posters, are so narrow minded you couldnt comprehend that reducing federal spending IS a possibility. You, like most of Congress both Democrat and Republican, always have to come up with ways to cover losses. Predictable, the lefts answer is ALWAYS "get it from the rich they have enough already". Very predictable. How about reduce spending? Its not a difficult thing to look at.
I just explained to you the real value of this tax cut is meagre pennies for the middle class in the short run and an actual tax increase in the long run, add to that the fact that morons like you supporting this tax bill have proposed cutting vital services (have you figured out what will be getting cut yet or do you need to be spoon fed that too? Go ask your buddy Paul Ryan) that said group use and you realise this doesn't benefit them at all no matter how you spin it. Are you really going to say any rational person would be happy getting screwed over like this?
First, since when are services being cut? Second, when have I ever...EVER...supported that?
Selective memory, lacking reading comprehension skills or just plain stupid? All three, I say.
Also when you compared the federal budget to your own household's. This was an absolute classic!
I don't want to oversimplify things, but cutting is always hard. Those like me who have had personal experience in their own house know this, but cutting is hard. There are many retraining programs available (changing with the times etc) and getting federal spending under control will take a national effort. In the case of the military, there are soooo many "black book" operations that can be cut.
You should absolutely give the thread a read. Maybe then you'd understand why I and others on this forum think you're stupid and uninformed.
Again, please show your work. And I suppose it would surprise you Im not a Republican, and I typically vote 40% D.
That figure is 99.86% bullshit. Everybody on these forums can see past this trick. Do you really think you were the first to try this "I'm not a Trumptard but.." schtick? Lol.
Oh and Fox. Makes up...maybe 10% of my news sources.
Just... wow... I said conservatives were uneducated and stupid and you have gone out of your way to prove my point for me.
I mean, not that you really care, because I know you dont. You arent smart enough to be able to change your views. Youre as fucking hypnotized by your crazy ass left heroes as many far right wackos are.
But fuckin A. Keep that lie-train rolling!
Feel free to weasel out of this. You're a plain stupid conservative and I want to make sure everybody gets to see the same mental gymnastics from the thread above played here. Anyways, I gave you an answer to your laughably stupid question. If you still need help understanding it please tell me, so we don't have to have suffer a brain aneurysm reading something as stupid as
this.