As you have gone to great efforts to communicate above, the topic itself is one for which you are emotionally invested to the point of eliciting emotions of anger on your behalf.
An emotional state which is known to cloud one's ability to think clearly and rationally about the topic itself.
Furthermore, you have endeavored to create something entirely artificial in your post such that you could then vilify "it" as if "it" had anything to do with me, my posts, or the spirit of the message I have communicated in this thread.
There is nothing I can do to dispel the multiple straw men you have concocted in your post. They are of your doing, not mine, and were crafted by you to serve your own misguided purpose, one born from a state of emotional investment in the topic itself, as you amply demonstrated.
Nothing productive will come from my attempting to engage you in rational discourse with the objective of dispelling your keen desire to see shadows of strawman where none exist. Make the devil of me if you find therapeutic benefit in the exercise, release that anger so the healing can start.
Its simply not healthy, not mentally healthy, for you to be so emotionally invested in something as inane as an online forum to the extent that it elicits emotions of anger from you when you are/were faced with the prospect that there are/were marketeers in the audience. Such a co-dependence with the makeup of a forum community is not healthy.
Well, I can see this got way out of hand. Clearly it was all my fault, and none of yours for saying that people get AMD hardware and me asking for clarification (that I pointed out multiple times does have some significance given this forum's history). I'm also clearly mentally deranged. I mean, I didn't make a single absurd analogy. Wait, I'm sure I can somehow compare it to Hitler and the Nazis, just give me a chance!
Whoa, I'm the one making a straw man argument when you won't even actually address my original question and then make claims about mental health? Whoops, I'm treading sketchy ground here, don't want to get too invested now do I? Because clearly, I invested so much here that they decided to make me a moderator.
Here's a link to help you with that last statement:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm
Multiple straw men? Please point them out. I seriously am completely baffled by your responses. You don't actually address anything, you just make accusations that I'm jumping to conclusions that you then basically confirmed to other people, and now you're just slinging silly accusations about anger issues.
You're using the straw man claim as a straw man argument.
I assure you my "anger" was short lived and I guess you're a digital switch when it comes to emotion, but I'm more analog. See, I can get "pissed" about something that, as you point out is inane and not worth it, and I really am not mad much at all (basically just stopped going here). Then, there are things that I would get really mad about. Like if our government were to detain a certain group of people for a suspect reason, even if it is during war time.
Here's something that might help you understand me being "pissed" about the focus group and shills:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exaggeration
All I wanted was a simple answer, clarification to an accusation that you yourself made. Instead, you just slung accusations. But yes, I'm the irrational one. [here it is again for ya:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm]