Why does Vista 64 Ultimate take so much longer than XP home to:
1. open and flip through pics
2. Show thumbnail pics in a folder full of pics (XP also kept the thumbnails cached when the folder was left then re-entered. Vista does not seem to.)
Why does Vista NOT open jpegs as regular pics in the windows pic viewer like XP does. In XP, it was easy to flip through jpegs as though they were pictures.
Why does Living Desktop in Vista Ultimate use so many more CPU cycles then any other desktop image. I would think it would use just more GPU via area. I don't use Living Desktop because of the above issue as well as very poor IQ on 2560x1600.
Vista 64 Ult for about 1 week
e4400 stock @ 2.0GHz
WD640 hdd
4GB DDR2
ATI X1950XT
Gigabyte P35
1. open and flip through pics
2. Show thumbnail pics in a folder full of pics (XP also kept the thumbnails cached when the folder was left then re-entered. Vista does not seem to.)
Why does Vista NOT open jpegs as regular pics in the windows pic viewer like XP does. In XP, it was easy to flip through jpegs as though they were pictures.
Why does Living Desktop in Vista Ultimate use so many more CPU cycles then any other desktop image. I would think it would use just more GPU via area. I don't use Living Desktop because of the above issue as well as very poor IQ on 2560x1600.
Vista 64 Ult for about 1 week
e4400 stock @ 2.0GHz
WD640 hdd
4GB DDR2
ATI X1950XT
Gigabyte P35