- Mar 25, 2001
- 19,275
- 1,361
- 126
Ok, so I was thinking about this today for some reason.
i^0=1
i^1=i
i^2=-1
i^3=i^2 * i=-1 * i = -i
i^4=i^2 * i^2= -1 * -1= 1
But why not...
i^4=i^3 * i = -i * i = -i
And I've read the rotational explanation of it, I get it, makes sense. But why could you not break i^4 down how I did the second time and end up with -i?
I'm sure there's an explanation and probably what it is is that I need to revisit exponents. Been a while since I've sat through a math class.
i^0=1
i^1=i
i^2=-1
i^3=i^2 * i=-1 * i = -i
i^4=i^2 * i^2= -1 * -1= 1
But why not...
i^4=i^3 * i = -i * i = -i
And I've read the rotational explanation of it, I get it, makes sense. But why could you not break i^4 down how I did the second time and end up with -i?
I'm sure there's an explanation and probably what it is is that I need to revisit exponents. Been a while since I've sat through a math class.