Originally posted by: Nitemare
Careful there gooseman, before I make the assumption that you are a hostile psychotic who posts before he thinks...
Think whatever you want to about me...I won't lose any sleep over it, I assure you.
Your previous post wasn't specific enough ("Would you have thought the same
thing if it had been a white kid") to clearly identify what you were taking issue with: 1.) the fact of someone harassing his wife, 2.) the decision (why or why not) about filing a complaint, or 3.) the fear of physical retribution if reported (which is a VALID fear, no matter who the offender is).
I am assuming there is a racial difference between poster and the harasser (otherwise why would he have specified "this one black kid"), but that isn't material to the issue raised, or at least IT SHOULDN'T BE. But, in effect, it is...because the whole "gang-banger" B.S. is simply a smokescreen for the real issue of that other post, WHICH IS THAT SOMEONE WAS HARASSING HIS WIFE.
A common ploy to avoid punishment for that kind of behavior: crying "racist" about a victim to excuse inappropriate and/or downright illegal behavior in the offender.
Now I don't know where this guy lives, I don't know what the socio-seconomic environment is like, and I don't even know if there is OBVIOUS proof of this kid being a gang member (his wife could be a schoolteacher, and this kid a student for all we know). But neither do you, which is my entire point.
Racism is a non-issue in sexual harassment, except where management refuses to take the appropriate and necessary action because of an offender's race, which CAN and DOES happen.