Originally posted by: Drewpy
Because nickel plating is thinner than chroming, reducing the impact of its reduced thermal conductivity. If they were made of plain copper they won't totally corrode and go green. But it will become noticeably duller in appearance. And why have dull looking copper sinks when you can have nice shiny nickel plated ones.
It's all about cost, but there's something else too. Firearms/gun bluing and finishing used to be a hobby of mine. Chrome is not easy to plate on most surfaces. In order to plate an object with Chrome, you first need to plate it with very soft copper or similiar metal. The chrome plating is then adhered to this "primer". This is very expensive for heatsinks that are aluminum/copper hybrids and even for full copper heatsinks like the SLK-800 because the degree of tensile strength used for the heatsink is different than the one used for the plating. It's just not cost effective.
Electroless nickel-plating is a little bit easier as there's no baking process to bond the metal coat. The object is simply submerged in a special, metal oxide solution and when an electric current is run through the solution, the nickel molecules "stick" to the object and hence, you have your nickel plating. Nickel plating is very tough when done right, but it's function is more cosmetic than practical since heatsinks don't encounter the same corrosion problems that carbon steel guns do.
EDIT: Oh yes. I forgot. Nickel plating has one very
severe drawback. Unless you have a
very thick piece of metal, the plated object has a tendency to become brittle and crack. Copper and/or aluminum will lose all of it's flexibility. Fins on heatsinks, especially the copper ones, are extremely thin. You could easily break it after a few times of installing/deinstalling it from your motherboard. Gun owners who reload their own ammunition will know EXACTLY what I'm talking about if they've ever tried to reuse nickel-plated brass more than a couple of times.