- Jan 30, 2000
- 5,158
- 0
- 71
http://www.technologyreview.com/articles/fischetti1102.asp?p=1
Interesting article on auto technology...
Interesting article on auto technology...
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
The only problem I see with this is that a part the size of your fingernail could render the vehicle completely useless and would probably cost $500-$1000 to replace. I do like the idea of the more efficient engine though, and I support all the ways of improving the IC engine. I've seen the mechanical valve idea a couple years ago in R&T, I like it. The same goes for the idea of a beltless engine.
ZV
Yeah, that's not a groundless conspiracy theory or anything.Originally posted by: Jellomancer
But then Enron makes less money! Hooray for public misinformation and government corruption.
Did this advertisement win you over: SUV.mp3Originally posted by: AdamK47 - 3DS
I like my Miabatsu Monstrosity thank you very much. So what if it only gets a few miles to the gallon. I'm a parent not a conservationalist. Mine is bigger!
What misinformation and corruption are mentioned or even hinted at?Originally posted by: Jellomancer
But then Enron makes less money! Hooray for public misinformation and government corruption.
Originally posted by: Jellomancer
But then Enron makes less money! Hooray for public misinformation and government corruption.
That doesn't mean that modern engines are at the height of efficiency...Originally posted by: Carbonyl
The three basic elements which effect gas mileage Mass, wind resistance, and rolling resistance won't allowed for it. Unless you put Sentra type tires, Sentra type mass and sentra type hight and profile on a Yukon it aint gonna happen, usinng the internal combustion engine. Then, though, you don't have an SUV anymore, right?
Originally posted by: Jellomancer
That doesn't mean that modern engines are at the height of efficiency...Originally posted by: Carbonyl
The three basic elements which effect gas mileage Mass, wind resistance, and rolling resistance won't allowed for it. Unless you put Sentra type tires, Sentra type mass and sentra type hight and profile on a Yukon it aint gonna happen, usinng the internal combustion engine. Then, though, you don't have an SUV anymore, right?
Originally posted by: Jellomancer
That doesn't mean that modern engines are at the height of efficiency...Originally posted by: Carbonyl
The three basic elements which effect gas mileage Mass, wind resistance, and rolling resistance won't allowed for it. Unless you put Sentra type tires, Sentra type mass and sentra type hight and profile on a Yukon it aint gonna happen, usinng the internal combustion engine. Then, though, you don't have an SUV anymore, right?
It seems to me that those developments aren't widely deployed though. They article said they are only in research labs. I don't read motor trend cover to cover, but I do like to catch the new technology articles. I'm inclined to agree with the article. I know there's no free lunch when you double the mass, but there is room for improvement. I'm also inclined to believe that the customers who buy SUVs aren't particularly interested in these improvements unless they are free or less expensive than current models.Thatb does't mean that they are either. It means, on a Yukon or smiliar vechile, the power needed to make it go, is at least twice that of a Sentra or like vehicle. So no matter what you try short of no longer making the SUV an SUV they will always be about half as effecient as small econo cars since the technology wll be applied accross the board on all vechiles. Now should they make Lithium powered cars we plug into our solar power generators to charge the battery, you will still have a larger battery needed with the SUV more solar panels need to charge that battery and more enviromental disposal issues with the SUV power plant and battery.
Originally posted by: charrison
This past week, GM(I think) announced they were going to spend about a billion dollars developing a new 6 speed automatic transmission. I assume this cost is for design, software,tooling and testing. They anticipate a 10+% increase in fuel economy.
I'd believe it.. end of an industry.Originally posted by: dcdomain
I once read an article about how this guy's invention (light bulb that never burns out) was bought by GE and destroyed or buried... any truth in that?
Originally posted by: dcdomain
I once read an article about how this guy's invention (light bulb that never burns out) was bought by GE and destroyed or buried... any truth in that?
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
There are some tungsten lightbulbs the military uses which do last many years. Problem is brightness suffers when you increase the filament diameter giving you longevity. I think,
Originally posted by: klah
Did this advertisement win you over: SUV.mp3Originally posted by: AdamK47 - 3DS
I like my Miabatsu Monstrosity thank you very much. So what if it only gets a few miles to the gallon. I'm a parent not a conservationalist. Mine is bigger!