IronWing
No Lifer
- Jul 20, 2001
- 70,229
- 28,935
- 136
He doesn't own an iPod. If he bought one he would have to pay sales tax which would support the state.Where's my free ipod?
He doesn't own an iPod. If he bought one he would have to pay sales tax which would support the state.Where's my free ipod?
anti-psychotics (regardless of the dose) dont really help me, they just stop me from pissing other people off. they put me to sleep on too high of a dose and if i am too low of a dose i dont really know the difference. if someone commits aggression against someone, then we need decentralized county-level justice where aggressors are punished proportionally while victims are restituted proportionately.
but if i cant think straight off of them and if i have to take them to know the difference, then im beyond help.
also, the meds arent going to do me any good in the long run or at least they wouldnt if people were free.
Have you read Dianetics? :biggrin:
Too bad the psych ward doesn't take away your internet access. And please take more anti-psychotics.
make all drugs legal and unregulated while allowing self-defense. plus see below.So what do you propose in place of psychiatry to deal with the issues the crop up from mental illnesses? You mentioned proportional punishment against aggressors, but what about treatment?
i dont think i was having flight of ideas. perhaps it was in the wrong place though. anyway, what i meant was psychiatrists are securitarians who think that they can prevent a huge amount of violence by having a legislative monopoly privilege on medicating people.This sounds like you don't have insight. Yes, antipsychotics can make you sleepy so you just need to work with your psychiatrist to adjust the dose appropriate. Not sure what's going on with the last sentence? Flight of ideas?
Holy shit, Tom Cruise posts here. Who knew?
KT
i have no plans to discontinue them. i am taking just as many as was when i joined here more than 3 years ago.[...]I'm inclined to think the anti-psychotics do make difference and you should keep on taking them.
i was dx'd with Schizoaffective disorder depressive subtype. but i have hyperactive frontal lobes rather than hypofrontality, so i dont know what the hell i have given that the latter is what occurs in schizophrenia. the psychologist whom i love so much and just went to said i may be on too much medication... he is skeptical of psychiatry and so am i.Schizophrenia? Just guessing given the disorganized thoughts.
There are gunmen who shoot up theaters, or throw themselves off of a bridge; mental illness can and does kill plenty of people.
Mental illnesses are not created by men; they are ways to figure out what is wrong with your brain. There aren't physical tests which tell 100% currently, but there may be tests like that in the future, we just don't have the technology yet.
They are one and the same; if your brain is messed up, then it can limit you.
That's debatable; I agree that suicide should be a legal option for anybody that wants it, as long as there is a waiting period, a waiver, and an area to write down your last will.
Businesses have to make money; I thought you were pro-business? There isn't enough time to treat every patient to the degree that they might need, but that's just a limit in manpower / resources.
Versus no treatment at all? If the business has no motivation, then relying upon people for charity is going to not get as far as a for-profit business.
In other words they help you.
There actually are standards, if you'd bother to read them.
See above.
nomental illnesses are not like, say, myocardial infarctions... the former cannot kill you.
mental illnesses are created by men (with very questionable motives) as no physical test can say with 100% certainty what mental illness you have.
mental illnesses cannot really limit you. what limits you most/advances you most is the overall physical characteristics of your brain.
if a mental illness is likely to cause to someone to commit suicide, then the psychiatric industrial state should not try to stop one from committing suicide.
the doctor at the psych ward didnt even observe me directly (or at least not for more than 5 minutes) before he diagnosed me. and then some really cool guy got a shot in the ass when he didnt even try to hurt anyone... he was just going on manically about lincoln and bi polar disorder which and it was really kind of funny. he told me that the psychiatric ward was just trying to make money off of me and i agree with him.
mental illnesses enrich psychiatrists and many pharmaceutical companies at the expense of patients who want prescriptions and the tax payer.
anti-psychotics (regardless of the dose) dont really help me, they just stop me from pissing other people off. they put me to sleep on too high of a dose and if i am too low of a dose i dont really know the difference. if someone commits aggression against someone, then we need decentralized county-level justice where aggressors are punished proportionally while victims are restituted proportionately.
psychology and biology are perfectly useful and they often follow ethical standards, but psychiatry has no ethical standards in favor of the patient.
do i think i need medication if i wanted to think straight at all? of course. does that mean that it is because i was diagnosed with a mental illness? hell no.
let me know if you want to argue with me on any of this.
How many discoveries wouldn't have happened if autistic people could be "fixed"?
anyway, i was quite surprised to see so many people on AT supporting the authoritarian bs that is psychiatry.
your last sentence should have been let me know if you want to discuss any of this with me!!let me know if you want to argue with me on any of this.
This is me just being curious: were a lot of discoveries made by people with autism?