Pretty much this. If Assange was slamming Trump, the Ds on here would be wetting themselves with unbridled elation and he'd be their hero. But did you mean Sanders vs Trump? Even if Trump hadn't run, I doubt that Jeb! would've been the nominee.
If I had any feeling they would be hurt.
His assumption also assumes that Trump had any strategy to leak. They could possibly get hacked info from the RNC, but it would be trying to keep Trump out, not in. And anyway, most of the Republican establishment are saying those things in public. Besides, the US media is already functioning as the Democrats' October surprise.
Wonder what odds one could get on which year of the Clinton II reign Julian eats a Hellfire.
Assange is the sort of person who prioritizes his own interests, and currently the olive branch from the kremlin is more enticing than anything the US is offering.
Just because you think of the world in simple american partisan terms doesn't mean nobody else is cognizant of the situation's reality.
I think the problem is more a lack of self-worth which can be shamed.
And another completely ignorant characterization from our little dimbulb. You have no idea of the things I consider. I purposely keep things on this forum simple for ones such as yourself. So in plain and simple terms, if Assange were dishing out on Trump little dimbulbs such as yourself wouldn't care where the information came from - period.
And as for my self esteem, it's just fine as i have little time for the childish pettiness that comes from one such as yourself. The constant fretting over self esteem that comes from people like you is partly to blame for the pathetic state of many millennials and their need for a safe space. I sit comfortably at the high end of Maslow's hierarchy, as told to me by a manager during one of my reviews - right before I told him I had no more need of him and that I was going to find another job, which I did.
You're an idiot, little man; and I'm not the only one on here that thinks way about you. If you've read my posts with any level of comprehension, you know fully well I'm not partisan. I've stated plainly that I don't care for Trump. I've called the republicans 'the stupid party' on several occasions - for good reasons. So kindly put your helmet back on and go back to licking windows and eating crayons.
If Secretary Clinton continued along the same vein as President Obama - and by her outlined policies the evidence is that she would - she would continue to decrease inequality in America by significant margins; see below from The Atlantic:It seems implied that Clinton is better for America than Trump. How so? Wealth inequality under democrat policies is already at critical levels. Democrats in practice are figuratively throwing gifts at the poor to placate them while the rich siphon off an every growing slice of wealth at nearly no risk. The fate of the country is actually hanging in the balance IMO.
And I have no illusions about the economy likely collapsing under trump, but the bubbles/misallocation of wealth needs to stop or else the whole thing goes down.
There are two outcomes... stop stimulating the economy and let what happens just happen and get it over with, or keep cutting rates and end up with some kind of bizarre Japanese economy where the birth rate is low because no one can afford a family.
I feel like if Japan goes under/hits full monetezation it would serve as a clear warning to the world what happens when you ignore your debt problems for too long
The level of insecurity in this post, particularly the highlighted where the path to these people's hearts is revealed, illuminates your situation better than anyone could in a few words. Thanks.
I don't live my life to make people like you happy or pine away for your approval.
Seems you've never consciously witnessed the same comical level of dumb insecurity in others, let's say the sort pleased even infatuated by a strongman calling them great, which rather reveals your standing relative to them.That's pretty much what said manager said about me, so frankly your infantile opinion is irrelevant. I don't live my life to make people like you happy or pine away for your approval.
I stand by my original agreement with the post I quoted. If Assange was pounding Trump (whom I've said many times that I'm not a fan), many of the Ds on here would be lapping it up and wouldn't bother the question where he got the info.
I think the problem is more a lack of self-worth which can be shamed.
You are also wrong.
Asset prices thanks to QE/ZIRP. This also forced everyone into stocks instead of bonds because the fed was buying a large chunk of the bonds. Its actually pretty simple IMO.Your concept of how wealth inequality even came about is seriously a bit odd.
Lower taxes for the rich and trickle down is not the answer.
Asset prices thanks to QE/ZIRP. This also forced everyone into stocks instead of bonds because the fed was buying a large chunk of the bonds. Its actually pretty simple IMO.
The changes to CEO compensation (stock based) combined with the over-use of financial tools = inequality.
Besides showing a chart that demonstrates they've had to throw more bread and T-shirts into the 99% doesn't make much difference. The 0.1% or even the 0.01% have a parabolic effect on income inequality. We've blown past the levels of wealth inequality that people saw in the 1929 days of oil tycoons and monopolistic corporate trusts. That should serve as warning/perspective to something alot of democrats are brushing off. I'm sure technology plays a role in wealth consolidation as well.
And no the solution isn't Obama paying your mortgage or health insurance, thats ignoring the problem until it boils over.
Despite all the fancy charts and wiki copy-pasta its still the same logical errors people who couldn't read in 1920 made.
No, pretty sure you seem unaffected by intellectual failure.
You are correct on this.
Your post don't effect me at all.
You are also wrong.
You are correct on this.
Your post don't effect me at all.
All I can say is thank you Wikileaks
Do you ever post anything that really matters in regard to any topic in P&N, other than the normal baby food you throw up ?