MongGrel
Lifer
- Dec 3, 2013
- 38,751
- 3,068
- 121
Haven't followed the thread once all the usual suspects arrived putting their typical denial on display but if anyone is interested in reading the emails, I have found them here. Not sure if this is all of them from the perspective that the releases keep coming. They are categorized and there is a brief synopsis.
http://www.vaskal.ca/podestafiles
If somebody else already posted this then deal with it.
Good job! Attack the source. Ever popular with those of a certain mindset.interesting. A Canadian domain with nothing other than the email leaks and link to reddit the donald.
Do you believe Wikileaks is politically allied with Russia?
Good job! Attack the source. Ever popular with those of a certain mindset.
Congrats?
Where in my post is the attack? I tried looking up who is but is has been set to private, registered by godaddy.com and not .ca
You don't think that is interesting? BTW, .ca domains are supposed to be reserved to Canadians.
I am not discounting the possibility it is a Canadian doing this, but the website has no other content whatsoever.
PS not a fan of Hilary either. But at least she knows what she is doing.
Well if I am mistaken then please accept my apologies.Where in my post is the attack? I tried looking up who is but is has been set to private, registered by godaddy.com and not .ca
You don't think that is interesting? BTW, .ca domains are supposed to be reserved to Canadians.
I am not discounting the possibility it is a Canadian doing this, but the website has no other content whatsoever.
PS not a fan of Hilary either. But at least she knows what she is doing.
Well if I am mistaken then please accept my apologies.
I think boomerang might have never gotten the catching the thing down well sometime in the pastGood job! Attack the source. Ever popular with those of a certain mindset.
Congrats?
I believe Assange and Russia have some interests that over lap right now.
Well, they've been ignoring Republicans and Trump for the most part, you can't tell me they can't find any dirt on Republicans. They're not trying for some reason.That's fair enough and probably true, but there's still a major distinction to be made between that and a claim that Wikileaks is just a propaganda arm for Russia.
Well, they've been ignoring Republicans and Trump for the most part, you can't tell me they can't find any dirt on Republicans. They're not trying for some reason.
Guess who tweeted the release of a new #Podesta email dump 29-mins BEFORE @Wikileaks tweeted the release?
Spoiler: Kremlin’s @RT_America pic.twitter.com/uCQdpeTLtE
— Silver Surfer (@RobPulseNews) October 22, 2016
That's fair enough and probably true, but there's still a major distinction to be made between that and a claim that Wikileaks is just a propaganda arm for Russia.
Out of curiosity, when has wikileaks ever published anything damaging or embarrassing to Russia or Putin? The Panama papers did, but that wasn't wikileaks, was it? In fact, Assange criticized it as a CIA plot to discredit Putin. Funny thing, wikileaks always seems to have information damaging to the US, but never to Russia.
I don't know if wikileaks is literally a "propaganda arm for Russia." But it's quite obvious they are aligned.
Wikileaks has nothing to do with transparency. It's all about Assange's personal predilections, which countries he likes and doesn't like, which politicians he favors or doesn't favor. It's a totally corrupt enterprise.
I still think the anti-American bias of the hacks can be explained at the hacking level
And Russia is known for the prowess of its hackers, both free agents and agents of the government.
Regarding Wikileaks leaking information that would embarrass Putin, history has shown that people who piss off Putin end up doing things like sipping tea with polonium in it.
I'm interested to see if you ever reach a point where you stop making up excuses for Wikileaks.
Exactly my point. I'm willing to accept that these hacks were performed by the Russian government and/or affiliates.
That doesn't sound like a horrible condemnation of Wikileaks tbh; they might receive anti-Russian hacks but are too fearful for their lives to leak them? Can't blame them for that.
Do you think the hacks coming from the Russian (or any other) government is the most important thing? Meaning, for example, if it was a lone-wolf like Assange himself that orchestrated the hacks (assuming that could somehow be proven with confidence) because he wanted to screw with the electoral process for the sake of making America a worse place, would that make it better to you?