BothSidesDoIt™: The last argument of people without the ability to distinguish everyday politics from xenophobic bigotry and misogyny packaged in Strongman authoritarianism
Got it.
Maybe nick will listen. Or not.It takes some time for people to grow up and realize that everything in the world isn't black and white, that both sides do it to different degrees and everything isn't equal to everyone else just because they think so. The world is still revolving around him, give him time.
I like the "whore" bit he tossed in...lol! Kids...
Rapist? So I'm guessing charges will be brought any moment now?
Clearly you're terrible at reading. Bill Clinton, who isn't a candidate for any office that I know of, had a consensual relationship with a White House intern, functional illiterate.
I've responded to your posts. Multiple times. That's why I quoted your "argument" in my posts. And, I'm not quite sure why you want screenshots of ribbons. Is it related to your preoccupation with thinking about teachers having sex with 17 year olds?lol, I'm a product of public education. But yourself, no response to my other posits? Expected.
And still, no pics. How bad is it to not qualify for the participant ribbon?
The best part of this is you're quoting someone who is quoting me and laughing at you, with me. Hilariously, you're clear lack of reading comprehension has given you the mistaken notion that he's criticizing something I've said.Maybe nick will listen. Or not.
So, he's admitted to consensual sex with a couple of women, and other women have said and alleged things without any evidence?You may have forgotten a few:
Juanita Broaddrick alleged that in the late 1970s Bill Clinton raped her in her hotel room.
Dolly Kyle said she had known Bill Clinton since she was eleven and had an affair with him starting around 1974 and ending in 1992.
Paula Jones claimed he propositioned and exposed himself to her. Clinton paid $850,000 settlement.
Kathleen Willey alleged Clinton groped her in the White House Oval Office in 1993. Linda Tripp testified that the Willey affair was consensual.
Gennifer Flowers had a 12-year sexual relationship with Bill Clinton. Bill first denied the affair but later admitted it under oath.
Eileen Wellstone alleged that Clinton raped her in 1969 after she had met him at a pub near Oxford University.
Elizabeth Ward Gracen first denied but later admitted she had a one-night stand with Clinton in 1982. Gracen later apologized to Hillary Clinton.
Sally Perdue, a former Miss Arkansas, said she had a four-month affair with him in 1983.
Lencola Sullivan, a former Miss Arkansas rumoured to have had a "sexual relationship" with Clinton by L.D. Brown, Clinton's state trooper body guard.
Of all the allegations made against him regarding his sexual history, Clinton has only admitted extramarital relationships with Monica Lewinsky and Gennifer Flowers, although he settled the suit brought by Paula Jones for $850,000. He denied having an affair with Dolly Kyle.
I still thought he was a damn good President.
This memo is intended to outline the strategy and goals a potential Hillary Clinton presidential campaign would have regarding the 2016 Republican presidential field. Clearly most of what is contained in this memo is work the DNC is already doing. This exercise is intended to put those ideas to paper.
Our Goals & Strategy
Our hope is that the goal of a potential HRC campaign and the DNC would be one-in-the-same: to make whomever the Republicans nominate unpalatable to a majority of the electorate. We have outlined three strategies to obtain our goal:
1) Force all Republican candidates to lock themselves into extreme conservative positions that will hurt them in a general election;
2) Undermine any credibility/trust Republican presidential candidates have to make inroads to our coalition or independents;
3) Muddy the waters on any potential attack lodged against HRC.
Operationalizing the Strategy
Pied Piper Candidates
There are two ways to approach the strategies mentioned above. The first is to use the field as a whole to inflict damage on itself similar to what happened to Mitt Romney in 2012. The variety of candidates is a positive here, and many of the lesser known can serve as a cudgel to move the more established candidates further to the right. In this scenario, we don’t want to marginalize the more extreme candidates, but make them more “Pied Piper” candidates who actually represent the mainstream of the Republican Party. Pied Piper candidates include, but aren’t limited to
• Ted Cruz
• Donald Trump
• Ben Carson
We need to be elevating the Pied Piper candidates so that they are leaders of the pack and tell the press to them seriously.
Hahahahahaha, a great discovery in one of these emails:
https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1120#attachments
Remember libs, if by some amazing miracle Trump wins, he's your creation.
Subject: What's the difference between a German and a shopping cart? A shopping cart has got a mind of its own
That Frau Schmerkel – who has ordered the blitz banlieue-ization of Dunkeldeutschland & its surrounding vassal states, even though she herself has reached the conclusion that masses of Muslims have brought nothing but massive misery to the Heimat – has gone completely bonkers was already evident from her Monty Pythonesque energy policy. Have a listen to a comedy clip with English-language subtitles
Yeah, like during the DNC primary debates where Clinton name-dropped Trump's name almost exclusively.
Lefties on this forum have said from the beginning that they wanted Trump to win the primary. Enjoy.
So name dropping trumps actually voting for trump? Are you really this fucking stupid?
isn't that just standard politicking?Hahahahahaha, a great discovery in one of these emails:
https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1120#attachments
Remember libs, if by some amazing miracle Trump wins, he's your creation.
isn't that just standard politicking?
there's a reason the GOP never attacked Bernie and Karl Rove's Super PAC ran ads in his favor.
No, but name-dropping him repeatedly, treating him like he was the only candidate even early in the primary process, was obviously to get people moving in that direction. She calls him out, MSM reports "Oh Hillary called out Trump", Trump gets more free ad time. They don't want anyone stealing them loyal colored folk away and had to undermine any efforts of Republicans to win non-white support.
Hmm...I wonder if, "early in the primaries" if trump was leading?
Lol! So now its the msm that gave trump all the attention and the right, who last I checked can't stand the msm, now is so influenced by it that they voted for trump?
That's quite the conspiracy you've got going there.
So the answer is yes, you really are that stupid!
So you think the primaries were already over in mid/late 2015?
How is it a conspiracy theory when they literally admit that it was part of their strategy and actively told the press to take them seriously? The Clinton campaign literally got its wish when Trump won the nomination.
So 20-30% of the vote means it's already over?
Not to mention many notable pollsters including Nate Silver predicted (incorrectly) that Trump's popularity was a flash in the pan and wouldn't last.
So you think the primaries were already over in mid/late 2015?
How is it a conspiracy theory when they literally admit that it was part of their strategy and actively told the press to take them seriously? The Clinton campaign literally got its wish when Trump won the nomination.
to be fair, her campaign wanted either Trump or Cruz or Carson, 2/3rds of which ended up being the final candidates.Are you retarded or blind? Those are graphs from the 2008 and 2012 primaries. As you can see, the leading candidates tended to go up and down, and in 2008 the long-time leader ended up collapsing at the very end. Despite this, Clinton behaved like it was already over in 2015. This is because she WANTED Trump to win the Republican primaries, just as her campaign strategy shows, as well as liberals here that realize Trump is crazy and in theory (key word) an easy guy to defeat.
Maybe nick will listen. Or not.
Ah, yes.Yeah, like during the DNC primary debates where Clinton name-dropped Trump's name almost exclusively.
Lefties on this forum have said from the beginning that they wanted Trump to win the primary. Enjoy.