- Aug 9, 2002
- 16,665
- 21
- 81
This is a small rant about how educational institutions and their gripes on Wikipedia being a valid source to cite. A lot of my older instructors discuss the creditability and reputably of Wiki for reporting so I will turn to one of Wikipedia's web pages to help prove my point.
First Amendment.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
Look for the citations at the bottom:
"Cornell University Law School Legal Information Institute. "
Ahhh screw that liberal teaching law school.
" Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990)"
Ah, common law means nothing.
""Bill of Rights". National Archives. Archived from the original on April 4, 2013. Retrieved April 4, 2013."
Ah, it was Retrieved well after the Bill of Rights were published. Can't be accurate.
Who the hell are these teachers who think Wiki isn't a valid source? Just because it was not written by their favorite bull shit politician or endorsed by their political party , special interest, or money grubbing publisher does not mean it is reputable!
First Amendment.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
Look for the citations at the bottom:
"Cornell University Law School Legal Information Institute. "
Ahhh screw that liberal teaching law school.
" Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990)"
Ah, common law means nothing.
""Bill of Rights". National Archives. Archived from the original on April 4, 2013. Retrieved April 4, 2013."
Ah, it was Retrieved well after the Bill of Rights were published. Can't be accurate.
Who the hell are these teachers who think Wiki isn't a valid source? Just because it was not written by their favorite bull shit politician or endorsed by their political party , special interest, or money grubbing publisher does not mean it is reputable!