PrinceofWands
Lifer
- May 16, 2000
- 13,522
- 0
- 0
Rocket launchers and full auto rifles could quite easily fit under the two definitions you gave.
Rocket launchers propel an exploding projectile meant to harm hardened targets or groups of men, and are therefore ordnance or artillery, neither of which are covered under 'arms'.
You are correct that we should have protected rights to full auto weapons, so long as military has access to them. The bans on modern automatic weapons ARE unconstitutional, though would likely be allowed to stand under false pretenses.