I hate to have any dependence in any way on at all on a Republican acting like Mike Pence.
Last edited:
I hate to have any dependence in any way on at all on a Republican acting like Mike Pence.The primary reason is the law is likely unconstitutional and is facing litigation so any attempt to remove her would need to wait until that’s done, which will likely make it too late to affect the case. Second, if it were upheld then people appointed by Kemp would need to brazenly interfere in a criminal case that Kemp clearly has no problem with, and finally whoever replaced her could just keep the case going.
Even if the district attorney was removed, the case doesn't go away - charges are already formally filed. And a new district attorney would be elected by Atlanta - quite likely re-electing her in a landslide ...
It might delay things a bit, but a district attorney's office doesn't halt its work just because the boss is temporarily removed by insane republican political machinations.
They could find a DA that would drop the case. This is Trump's plan for federal charges if he wins the WH.Even if the district attorney was removed, the case doesn't go away - charges are already formally filed. And a new district attorney would be elected by Atlanta - quite likely re-electing her in a landslide ...
It might delay things a bit, but a district attorney's office doesn't halt its work just because the boss is temporarily removed by insane republican political machinations.
You would think so but just look at Florida where two elected democrat da have been removed on a whim.Well, I would say that they need realistic cause to dismiss, not that lack of same has stopped them before. Popcorn anyone?
BUT HE'S NOT CONVICTED YETNot sure where to put this since there are so many Trump threads, so I will put it here.
View attachment 84907
So interesting that the Rs would put a felon in the White House when most states do not allow a felon to vote.
Bolton said something similar; but that is the state of republicans these days - a felon (to be) is they worship. Tells you something about their faith in general....Not sure where to put this since there are so many Trump threads, so I will put it here.
View attachment 84907
So interesting that the Rs would put a felon in the White House when most states do not allow a felon to vote.
Sorry, let me 'splain. The thing I posted references the GOP debate. They were asked if Trump was convicted and got the GOP nomination, would they support him being elected as president. 6 of 8 raised their hand and said they would support that.BUT HE'S NOT CONVICTED YET
is what they'll say
Sorry, let me 'splain. The thing I posted references the GOP debate. They were asked if Trump was convicted and got the GOP nomination, would they support him being elected as president. 6 of 8 raised their hand and said they would support that.
Yep. The party of law and order will put a convicted felon into the White House over a Democrat. They'd put a big fat cow pie in the WH before voting for a Democrat.
No current title is funShouldn't the title of this thread be changed; after all Georgia has indicted the squashed pumpkin.
I think bail bondsmen are smart enough to get payment upfront.You said it yourself. He will stiff the bond company and pay nothing.
I think bail bondsmen are smart enough to get payment upfront.
It was updated. It even says so. Does that not show up for you?Shouldn't the title of this thread be changed; after all Georgia has indicted the squashed pumpkin.
I'm betting Trump talked the bondsman into waiving his fee up front and probably some bogus collateral, like Trump's personal guaranty or a secondary mortgage on a property already underwater. That's way he operates. Back in the late 80's or early 90's I was at a bar convention with my new boss, who was of the premiere old school civil trial attorneys in CT. At lunch our table was 3-4 of the top divorce attorneys in CT. One of the stories one of them told was Trump recently tried to hire him to handle his ongoing divorce for free-Trump claiming the publicity for doing so would be golden to that guy's practice. That attorney was smart enough to turn him down.The 10% payment is up front. And the full bail amount is usually secured through some sort of collateral, like a car or real estate.
So if Trump wants to stiff the bondsmen, I'm OK with Mar A Lago having a new owner.
Bondsmen deal with really shady people. Cause those are the only people who need bondsmen. I'm going to be very certain they have ironclad contracts.
I'm betting Trump talked the bondsman into waiving his fee up front and probably some bogus collateral, like Trump's personal guaranty or a secondary mortgage on a property already underwater. That's way he operates. Back in the late 80's or early 90's I was at a bar convention with my new boss, who was of the premiere old school civil trial attorneys in CT. At lunch our table was 3-4 of the top divorce attorneys in CT. One of the stories one of them told was Trump recently tried to hire him to handle his ongoing divorce for free-Trump claiming the publicity for doing so would be golden to that guy's practice. That attorney was smart enough to turn him down.
You would think but trump loyalist seem to make these sort of mistakes hourly. Gotta give Trump credit for exposing the 50 or so million suckers in this country.I think bail bondsmen are smart enough to get payment upfront.