In my opinion it is also a matter of conflicting absolutes where only one absolute is acknowledged. The issue that a fertalized human egg is a unique human being is logically sound such that it is an easy step to say that intentional abortion is murder. But I have heard that the Jews of ancient times maintained that the spirit of a human being enters a fetus only after it is named, avoiding the notion that abortion is murder along with the grief that accompanied so many deaths of infants at birth. To my mind that perspective of when a person becomes a person represents the kindness of wisdom.I think what he is saying is correct, at least from a logical perspective. If you believe a fetus is a human and abortion is the killing of a human being why would the fact that this human's mom was raped factor in? Generally speaking they say it's because it wasn't the woman's 'fault' she got pregnant there, but why does that excuse murder?
This all stems from the fact that actually logically consistent anti-abortion views are horrifically unpopular in America so right wingers make incoherent compromises/lies to make them less unpopular. It's the same thing with how the 'life begins at conception' people wouldn't save a tray of 1,000 embryos instead of one actual baby even though according to them that's 1,000 babies vs. 1.
Furthermore, a person has a right to ones own personhood and slavery is forbidden. Conservatives want to enslave women in favor of one notion of the absolute while avoiding the fact they violate another. Behind all of it, in my poinion is a presence of masculine inferiority, the sense that if women have choice they would never choose an authoritarian male as a mate and to which Incel culture is a testament. The supply of Stockholm women is limited to areas of cultural backwardness.