But but but they don’t plan to vote for him in 2024!!! But their little circle jerk was amusing.Trump voters concerned about ethics and credibility. LOL
But but but they don’t plan to vote for him in 2024!!! But their little circle jerk was amusing.Trump voters concerned about ethics and credibility. LOL
Interesting that Willis hasn't denied the claims of a relationship. If there is some evidence that it exists, she should get in front of it rather than respond after the fact. Admitting she hooked up her boyfriend and apologizing would lend her a little bit of ethical cover as opposed to waiting for the details to come out.
Even if true unless it breaks a rule or law all you have is appearance and we all know MAGAs don't give a damn about how something looks.Her lack of denial isn't evidence that a relationship happened. Not addressing it directly is a reasonable strategy in this situation. Let it fade away until the next news cycle. Since there's no way to definitively prove nothing happened even if that's the case, there really is no benefit to her inviting more attention to it.
The plot thickens.
I'm pretty sure that Ms. Willis is a liberal, and there was no mention of a threesome that I'm aware of.That's not a plot. What you're seeing thicken is the cesspool of hypocritical, threesome affair having, racist, fascist filth that all conservatives swim in.
Acting intentionally stupid is a strategy for you I guess but it isn’t a good look.I'm pretty sure that Ms. Willis is a liberal, and there was no mention of a threesome that I'm aware of.
I don't see how he could skate, it's not like she was altering evidence. He might get a do over, and that could work out worse for Trump if they hire someone who is actually a prosecutor.Just saw that the judge in the Fulton County Trump case has asked DA Willis to formally respond to the allegation. If Trump skates on this—it will be the ultimate in judicial fuck ups.
She's using $250,000 of her campaign contributions to make it go away.Like that is going to happen.
Meanwhile a Supreme Court is going to hear an insurrection case against Trump with 1 judge who's wife participated, and 3 judges put on the bench by him. The people that are pretending to be concerned about this Willis but not about the supreme Court are full of shit.The "other ways" you refer to are the appearances of a conflict, and are specifically described in the CNN article. You're right that legal experts don't see much here that affects the case, but the essential question is why even chance things at all? Is there a chance Willis recuses herself? If she does, that at the least affects the public perception of the case.
There doesn't have to be any truth to the salacious allegations of an affair. IF Willis steered public money to a second rate law firm in the biggest prosecution of her lifetime, that is obviously a huge problem.
Their videos are way too click baity, can you summarize?
Yeah I think this is something that should be looked into as a matter of good governance but when conservatives pretend to care about this they should be completely ignored as they're lying, we know they are lying, and they know we know they are lying.Meanwhile a Supreme Court is going to hear an insurrection case against Trump with 1 judge who's wife participated, and 3 judges put on the bench by him. The people that are pretending to be concerned about this Willis but not about the supreme Court are full of shit.
Worse case this is workplace ethics violation and less than zero to do with the case.
Allegations are a lie cooked up by the prosecutors EX, Mike Roman and his attorney.Their videos are way too click baity, can you summarize?
Allegations are a lie cooked up by the prosecutors EX, Mike Roman and his attorney.
Let's see, a claim with no evidence. Someone associated with Trump.First I don't know if these allegations are true and don't really care who she decides to go to bed with. It shouldn't have any impact with the Trump Proceedings.
Do you have some evidence that these are lies other than your opinion?
I would have to say that at this point anyone associated with Trump has LONG since lost the benefit of the doubt when it comes to if they are lying or not.First I don't know if these allegations are true and don't really care who she decides to go to bed with. It shouldn't have any impact with the Trump Proceedings.
Do you have some evidence that these are lies other than your opinion?
First I don't know if these allegations are true and don't really care who she decides to go to bed with. It shouldn't have any impact with the Trump Proceedings.
Do you have some evidence that these are lies other than your opinion?
What? But what if your feeling is that they are out to get you. Then you know Armageddon is neigh because of all the rumors of this and that. It's a sign and I hate myself so much I just can't wait for it to end?I see you're unfamiliar with the burden of proof.
Claims made without evidence may be dismissed without evidence.
Full fucking stop.
You should already know I'm with you.Meanwhile a Supreme Court is going to hear an insurrection case against Trump with 1 judge who's wife participated, and 3 judges put on the bench by him. The people that are pretending to be concerned about this Willis but not about the supreme Court are full of shit.
Worse case this is workplace ethics violation and less than zero to do with the case.
Let's see, a claim with no evidence. Someone associated with Trump.
Based on history their claim has a 75% chance of being a lie.
Could Fani be dating that other lawyer? Maybe, but the main point of their claim is he is funneling money to her. That sounds like complete bullshit.