Originally posted by: frostedflakes
This is why I don't really see the big deal about converting. Metric is already used in the sciences where it actually matters. For Joe Consumer, though, metric vs. imperial doesn't really make a difference. I mean the switch will have to happen eventually because of globalism, but I'd just let the transition happen naturally.Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
i doubt it. afaik, most, if not all science/engineering is done in metric units. i wouldn't have it any other way
/furiously reads WikipediaOriginally posted by: Jeff7
Dear god I hope so. English units are a damn nightmare with engineering work.
Pounds mass. What the hell?
Pounds is a unit of force, not mass.
And it doesn't help to have food sold by weight (oz) and mass (grams). They're not interchangeable, dammit!
I use this for mass units in English as often as I can: (lbs-sec²)/in
It really makes things so much easier.
Originally posted by: Eli
/furiously reads WikipediaOriginally posted by: Jeff7
Dear god I hope so. English units are a damn nightmare with engineering work.
Pounds mass. What the hell?
Pounds is a unit of force, not mass.
And it doesn't help to have food sold by weight (oz) and mass (grams). They're not interchangeable, dammit!
I use this for mass units in English as often as I can: (lbs-sec²)/in
It really makes things so much easier.
I was going to say "wat", but I think you just blew my mind.
Edit: It does say that ounce is commonly used as a unit of mass in the US, though. lol
And I've seen instrumentation labeled in "kgf" - kilograms-force.Originally posted by: Eli
/furiously reads WikipediaOriginally posted by: Jeff7
Dear god I hope so. English units are a damn nightmare with engineering work.
Pounds mass. What the hell?
Pounds is a unit of force, not mass.
And it doesn't help to have food sold by weight (oz) and mass (grams). They're not interchangeable, dammit!
I use this for mass units in English as often as I can: (lbs-sec²)/in
It really makes things so much easier.
I was going to say "wat", but I think you just blew my mind.
Edit: It does say that ounce is commonly used as a unit of mass in the US, though. lol
But it sure as hell makes the Universe a lot easier to understand and explain.Originally posted by: Tom
the universe isn't metric.
Originally posted by: Jeff7
Dear god I hope so. English units are a damn nightmare with engineering work.
Pounds mass. What the hell?
Pounds is a unit of force, not mass.
And it doesn't help to have food sold by weight (oz) and mass (grams). They're not interchangeable, dammit!
I use this for mass units in English as often as I can: (lbs-sec²)/in
It really makes things so much easier.
I'm pretty sure metric is standard curriculum in US public schools, so it's not like kids aren't at the very least familiar with the system. That should be good enough, the stuff isn't exactly rocket science. All a conversion to metric would do is give people a better intuitive sense of metric units.Originally posted by: LumbergTech
Originally posted by: frostedflakes
This is why I don't really see the big deal about converting. Metric is already used in the sciences where it actually matters. For Joe Consumer, though, metric vs. imperial doesn't really make a difference. I mean the switch will have to happen eventually because of globalism, but I'd just let the transition happen naturally.Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
i doubt it. afaik, most, if not all science/engineering is done in metric units. i wouldn't have it any other way
eh, wouldn't it be better to have the children fully prepared to compete in that environment, then to just wait for them to be behind
Things also go nuts when you're trying to get units to work out properly. If you're doing an equation in lbf and ft, and suddenly you get a density in lbm/in, or something like that, you may find yourself needing to divide by 386.4 and then some weird conversion factor to get lbm and lbf to work out. It's a mess, and it's a hell of a lot easier in metric.Originally posted by: jarfykk
Originally posted by: Jeff7
Dear god I hope so. English units are a damn nightmare with engineering work.
Pounds mass. What the hell?
Pounds is a unit of force, not mass.
And it doesn't help to have food sold by weight (oz) and mass (grams). They're not interchangeable, dammit!
I use this for mass units in English as often as I can: (lbs-sec²)/in
It really makes things so much easier.
Well, no they're not measuring the same thing. But since the gravitational force exerted is more or less constant on Earth, they can be converted quite easily and for most intents and purposes are the same thing. It is when you head into space that the easy convertibility gets murky...
I'm just glad I'm an EE and not an ME or CE. Fortunately, seems like we mostly work with SI units.Originally posted by: Jeff7
Things also go nuts when you're trying to get units to work out properly. If you're doing an equation in lbf and ft, and suddenly you get a density in lbm/in, or something like that, you may find yourself needing to divide by 386.4 and then some weird conversion factor to get lbm and lbf to work out. It's a mess, and it's a hell of a lot easier in metric.Originally posted by: jarfykk
Originally posted by: Jeff7
Dear god I hope so. English units are a damn nightmare with engineering work.
Pounds mass. What the hell?
Pounds is a unit of force, not mass.
And it doesn't help to have food sold by weight (oz) and mass (grams). They're not interchangeable, dammit!
I use this for mass units in English as often as I can: (lbs-sec²)/in
It really makes things so much easier.
Well, no they're not measuring the same thing. But since the gravitational force exerted is more or less constant on Earth, they can be converted quite easily and for most intents and purposes are the same thing. It is when you head into space that the easy convertibility gets murky...
Originally posted by: Train
jeebus do we have to have a thread a week where the metric fanboys tell us how lame the rest of the US is for using a diff system.
Use metric when you need to, or when it makes sense. It doesnt make you smarter or better than someone who uses feet/inches, get over yourself.
note: I use metric everyday in my job, and I can speak fluently in kilometers and mils when traversing terrain. But I still prefer to speak in MPH, degrees F, and "six feet tall"
Originally posted by: QueBert
Originally posted by: Train
jeebus do we have to have a thread a week where the metric fanboys tell us how lame the rest of the US is for using a diff system.
Use metric when you need to, or when it makes sense. It doesnt make you smarter or better than someone who uses feet/inches, get over yourself.
note: I use metric everyday in my job, and I can speak fluently in kilometers and mils when traversing terrain. But I still prefer to speak in MPH, degrees F, and "six feet tall"
Lame! I mean saying I'm 200 pounds sounds dumb, I'd much rather tell people I weigh 38.4 stone.
I hate Metrics, I hate Celsius, I hate KM. ounces & pounds makes sense to me, people who weight themselves based off this "stone" thing, I have no idea lol...
Originally posted by: ironwing
No, not entirely, ever. The land grid for every state platted after the Northwest Ordnance is laid out in township/range/section. Townships are six miles on a side, sections are mile squares. The land is further subdivided into 640 acres in 160 acre/40 acre/10 acre chunks. Trying to convert the survey grid to metric would be hellishly expensive and complicated. I will go out on a limb and say it ain't going to happen.