Originally posted by: petrusbroder
I agree with PCTC2 and Rudy Toody: needs go before charity (any charity, incl. F@H).
Then there is the matter of luxury ... IMHO charity goes before luxury: If you can feed, clothe, provide living space, schooling and reasonable transportation and relaxation to your family and your self, then finding the cure - in one way or the other - goes before luxury.
Originally posted by: Duvie
In the grand scheme the results out of this prgram for the amount of energy that has been consumed and the money involved with that can definitely make a case that it is money NOT WELL spent.
Originally posted by: LOUISSSSS
Originally posted by: petrusbroder
I agree with PCTC2 and Rudy Toody: needs go before charity (any charity, incl. F@H).
Then there is the matter of luxury ... IMHO charity goes before luxury: If you can feed, clothe, provide living space, schooling and reasonable transportation and relaxation to your family and your self, then finding the cure - in one way or the other - goes before luxury.
so you say: if you have enough money for your immediate needs, then you'd put charity over personal luxuries
Originally posted by: Thump553
I stopped folding on my home machine. Its an old Athlon and I recently had to do a clean install on it. Without F@H on it I've noticed about 7+ C degree drop for the CPU. The box is pretty adequately ventilated.
I can afford to replace that machine at this time and can't justify running it at the high temps (55 C in the winter, 60+ in summer) that I was getting.
Besides given the numbers crunchers with more modern boxes are turning in (many multiples of mine) my contribution is becoming increasingly insignificant.
Originally posted by: Fullmetal Chocobo
I am going along with the assumption that the discussion is not limited to folding only, and pertains to crunching as a whole, since not all of us explicitly fold. And while I would never debate that needs come before wants, wants before wishes (ie personal needs, charity, luxury), because you can't crunch if you can't eat nor have electricity. But I think it is wrong to say that we have wasted huge amounts of energy and money to work on a project that has no return, because I hope no one went into it expecting a return. There is a possibility, and we are all hopeful someone does, but it was never an expectation. I sure didn't expect to meet the people here, but it was a nice result.
Okay, I'll just admit it. I crunch as much as I can afford to (and as much as Liz will allow), but I do it for the stats. No concern for the results, because they will happen if they happen.
EDIT: I want a t-shirt that says "I crunch... and my machines like it".
Originally posted by: LOUISSSSS
so most people in here seem to say: i will stop folding if it affects my family, my food, my shelter.
Have any of you stop folding because of other stuff?
does this statement have any validity to you guys: "i thought folding was more of a cult app? i still stand by my opinion- follding is good if u have 3+ pcs and or ps3s and make good money; even better if ur the admin of some corprate and fold all the pcs when no1's looking; the economy + greener living goes against folding rite now"