Win7 + Steam + Fallout 3

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

futurefields

Diamond Member
Jun 2, 2012
6,470
32
91
Of course, you forget, New Vegas is much less linear than Fallout 3. You could literally go to New Vegas in the first hour of the game, even though you're only "supposed" to get there mid-late game. You just had to be good at sneaking past deathclaws. Also there are 10x as many side quests than Fallout 3. NV had actual rewards in terms of quests than Fo3, which had very very few.

Fallout 3, good luck with that, that doesn't really exist. Much more linear because you HAVE to go through the damn metro tunnels to get to many places.

Fair enough. I prefer Fallout 3 so we'll just have to agree to disagree.
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,079
136
Of course, you forget, New Vegas is much less linear than Fallout 3. You could literally go to New Vegas in the first hour of the game, even though you're only "supposed" to get there mid-late game. You just had to be good at sneaking past deathclaws. Also there are 10x as many side quests than Fallout 3. NV had actual rewards in terms of quests than Fo3, which had very very few.

Fallout 3, good luck with that, that doesn't really exist. Much more linear because you HAVE to go through the damn metro tunnels to get to many places.

Actually, in the first hour of Fallout 3 you could beeline to the garage, the Docs vault, use the shortcut to finish the happy little town simulation, and be working your way with dad back to Rivet City.
In theory you could avoid ALL combat, and there certainly werent any deathclaws along the way anyhow.
 

pw38

Senior member
Apr 21, 2010
294
0
0
Because going through the same looking metro over and over is a great setting.

Also the story was so damn full of plotholes, that is was ridiculous.

I also notice you didn't touch on the massive dump that FO3 was combat/gameplay wise.

Jesus dude, can someone have an opinion on it that differs from yours?

I liked the sense of exploration in FO3 more so than NV. The "feel" of the wasteland was better to me. NV was a bit of a mixed bag. Plenty right about it but some stuff that was just a bit off. NV did have aspects to it's gameplay 3 didn't have but it also came out afterwards too so that's to be expected. I wouldn't call it a "better" game because of it though.

I play FO3 standalone in Win864 and have had no issues whatsoever with it aside from the usual Bethesda bugs. One cool thing is playing on the PC this time and being able to toggle no clip and god mode on to go places I wasn't able to on the 360 version (especially the highly radioactive area out west that would kill you in seconds. That I couldn't "discover" that location due to this bugs me to this day).
 
Oct 25, 2006
11,036
11
91
Jesus dude, can someone have an opinion on it that differs from yours?

I liked the sense of exploration in FO3 more so than NV. The "feel" of the wasteland was better to me. NV was a bit of a mixed bag. Plenty right about it but some stuff that was just a bit off. NV did have aspects to it's gameplay 3 didn't have but it also came out afterwards too so that's to be expected. I wouldn't call it a "better" game because of it though.

I play FO3 standalone in Win864 and have had no issues whatsoever with it aside from the usual Bethesda bugs. One cool thing is playing on the PC this time and being able to toggle no clip and god mode on to go places I wasn't able to on the 360 version (especially the highly radioactive area out west that would kill you in seconds. That I couldn't "discover" that location due to this bugs me to this day).


Not to mention shit like DT being removed, SPECIAL stats not affecting your conversational choices, traits being removed, perks at every level, generally easy difficulty even on hardest, massive reduction of damage in VATS for some godforsaken reason,
 
Last edited:

Childs

Lifer
Jul 9, 2000
11,313
7
81
I didnt have any problems on Win 7 64, but I applied a bunch of patches and mods. And I launch via FOSE.
 

futurefields

Diamond Member
Jun 2, 2012
6,470
32
91

That plot summary is stupid.

Both sides wanted to turn the purifier on, the point in Fallout 3 is to keep the Enclave from getting control of it because the Enclave have evil totalitarian plans for the Wasteland. The Brotherhood = good, the Enclave = evil. Do you want good or evil controlling the fresh water source?

Glad you understood the plot.
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,079
136
I didnt have any problems on Win 7 64, but I applied a bunch of patches and mods. And I launch via FOSE.

The script extender all by itself doenst make the game any more or less stable. Its all the weird mods that it requires.

The mods that fix holes in the game dont make it any more stable, they just patch broken quests and such.
 

Childs

Lifer
Jul 9, 2000
11,313
7
81
The script extender all by itself doenst make the game any more or less stable. Its all the weird mods that it requires.

The mods that fix holes in the game dont make it any more stable, they just patch broken quests and such.

I think I installed a mod that included a massive patch. However, I would need to look at my notes to know what I actually installed.
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,079
136
I think I installed a mod that included a massive patch. However, I would need to look at my notes to know what I actually installed.

I had one for F3 and one for new vegas.
The new vegas one is called Mission Mojave. And it really worked.
 

Scooby Doo

Golden Member
Sep 1, 2006
1,034
18
81
Hmmm never had a problem with F3 in W7 64bit. In fact even with mods it was more stable than oblivion.
 

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
To clarify my earlier post, FO3 was only as crashy on Win7 32 as it was on XP 32. Bethesda game engine = expect some crashes.

Arrgh, now I want to play new games of both F03 and FONV!

My backlog is huge enough already without spending another month on these.
 

raasco

Platinum Member
Feb 6, 2009
2,638
3
76

Cerb

Elite Member
Aug 26, 2000
17,484
33
86
You really want to install to a location not in Program Files. I had several minor and major problems, and re-installing in my user folder fixed them. For Steam, apparently you'd need to move your whole Steam installation to a different location.

Also, the 4GB patch improves stability, along with several common mods.

I have only played it on Win7 64-bit.
Actually, in the first hour of Fallout 3 you could beeline to the garage, the Docs vault, use the shortcut to finish the happy little town simulation, and be working your way with dad back to Rivet City.
In theory you could avoid ALL combat, and there certainly werent any deathclaws along the way anyhow.
After my first character, I made it a point to go straight to Rivet City, with no leveling up. it usually only took 2 or 3 tries.
 

pw38

Senior member
Apr 21, 2010
294
0
0


Not to mention shit like DT being removed, SPECIAL stats not affecting your conversational choices, traits being removed, perks at every level, generally easy difficulty even on hardest, massive reduction of damage in VATS for some godforsaken reason,

I'm still confused on what you're trying to prove. FO3, TO ME, was a better overall experience. You can quote random posts on the game all you want, and I never said NV isn't a good game, but I just enjoyed FO3 more. My contention is just every post I've seen is some crusade against the game when it doesn't fucking matter. You enjoyed NV more, I enjoyed FO3 more, what's so hard about leaving it at that?
 

aigomorla

CPU, Cases&Cooling Mod PC Gaming Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 28, 2005
20,894
3,246
126

iamwiz82

Lifer
Jan 10, 2001
30,772
13
81
I'm still confused on what you're trying to prove. FO3, TO ME, was a better overall experience. You can quote random posts on the game all you want, and I never said NV isn't a good game, but I just enjoyed FO3 more. My contention is just every post I've seen is some crusade against the game when it doesn't fucking matter. You enjoyed NV more, I enjoyed FO3 more, what's so hard about leaving it at that?

Reminds me of Hi Fidelity:

BARRY
What's wrong with the Righteous Brothers?

DICK
Nothing. I just prefer the other one.

BARRY
Bullshit.

ROB
How can it be bullshit to state a preference?
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126


Not to mention shit like DT being removed, SPECIAL stats not affecting your conversational choices, traits being removed, perks at every level, generally easy difficulty even on hardest, massive reduction of damage in VATS for some godforsaken reason,
LMAO, thanks!

I really had no problem with the plot in Fallout 3 in spite of the above. I liked that in Fallout 3, the BoS were actually good guys. In Fallout New Vegas, every faction was a collection of dicks. Well, except for the Legion which was straight-up evil, not to mention extremely silly.
 

smackababy

Lifer
Oct 30, 2008
27,024
79
86
LMAO, thanks!

I really had no problem with the plot in Fallout 3 in spite of the above. I liked that in Fallout 3, the BoS were actually good guys. In Fallout New Vegas, every faction was a collection of dicks. Well, except for the Legion which was straight-up evil, not to mention extremely silly.

Liberty Prime was quite possibly the greatest character in video game history.
 

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
Liberty Prime was quite possibly the greatest character in video game history.

Liberty Prime made grind through FO3, in between its crashes, sort of worth it. Should have just watched the clips on YouTube though. Less frustrating.

I had to play through FO3 on on my backup machine, with Vista 32, an X2 4000, and a Radeon 4350 just so it wouldn't crash as often.
 

pw38

Senior member
Apr 21, 2010
294
0
0
Reminds me of Hi Fidelity:

BARRY
What's wrong with the Righteous Brothers?

DICK
Nothing. I just prefer the other one.

BARRY
Bullshit.

ROB
How can it be bullshit to state a preference?

Ah, such a good movie.
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,079
136
Admittedly Liberty Prime was cool, but in the assault on the purifier Liberty Prime made me pretty much redundant.

Most of the game was like that. You could run straight from vault 101 to your dads vault (no combat), get him out of the virtual town without combat, zip straight to rivet city, clear out the memorial (minimal combat with help), go through the GECK vault (possible to avoid all combat and/or get help from the toughest companion), run through the Enclave base with no combat until the end when the robots do everything for you.
Head back to the paladin stronghold possibly avoiding all combat, use Liberty Prime to do all the work for you on the way back to the memorial. Minimal combat with lots of help inside the memorial.

Its possible to kill maybe a dozen people or less in your quest.

New Vegas aint like that. Even with help you'll have to do an awful lot of work yourself.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
Most of the game was like that. You could run straight from vault 101 to your dads vault (no combat), get him out of the virtual town without combat, zip straight to rivet city, clear out the memorial (minimal combat with help), go through the GECK vault (possible to avoid all combat and/or get help from the toughest companion), run through the Enclave base with no combat until the end when the robots do everything for you.
Head back to the paladin stronghold possibly avoiding all combat, use Liberty Prime to do all the work for you on the way back to the memorial. Minimal combat with lots of help inside the memorial.

Its possible to kill maybe a dozen people or less in your quest.

New Vegas aint like that. Even with help you'll have to do an awful lot of work yourself.
You probably could, but why would you?
 

pw38

Senior member
Apr 21, 2010
294
0
0
I think the point was to say that FO3 was in no way any more linear than NV and probably less so to be honest.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |