looks like MS is pushing for October release http://www.pcworld.com/article/248226/expect_windows_8_in_october.html
Windows 3.1-1992
Windows 95-1995
Windows 98-1998
Windows 2k-2000
Windows ME-2000 (Home edition of windows 2k)
Windows XP-2001
Windows Vista-2006
Windows 7-2009
Windows 8-2012
Aside from 00-01, MS has been on a fairly consistent release cycle. The timing is nothing new.
looks like i'll be using windows 7 for the next 10 years.
Don't count on it. That would be like buying Windows 95 for the explicit purpose of only running DOS applications. Microsoft wants you using Metro and developers writing for Metro, and that means Metro needs to be kept enabled.As long as they give the option to do away with the Metro completely on traditional desktops, I'm all for it and will upgrade day 1. The developer preview kind of surprised me with how they had it implemented, but I understand that was extremely early and no representative of the final product in any way.
If that's the case I will be stocking up on Windows 7 keys.Don't count on it. That would be like buying Windows 95 for the explicit purpose of only running DOS applications. Microsoft wants you using Metro and developers writing for Metro, and that means Metro needs to be kept enabled.
Total noob: what is the Metro?
Metro is the UI for Windows 8. It's based around touch so it's "tablet friendly", but from all accounts it's only good for touch. Not so good for mouse, keyboard and other interface methods.
Metro is more than a UI. It's a complete design framework; it encompasses not just a new UI, but a largely new API (WinRT) too.Metro is the UI for Windows 8. It's based around touch so it's "tablet friendly", but from all accounts it's only good for touch. Not so good for mouse, keyboard and other interface methods.
crap
Windows 3.1-1992
crap
Windows 98-1998
crap
Windows XP-2001
crap
Windows 7-2009
crap