- Jun 29, 2005
- 21
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: werk
UGH! Those sections are painful to look at. Terrible design.
Originally posted by: ITJunkie
Originally posted by: werk
UGH! Those sections are painful to look at. Terrible design.
Agreed...
Originally posted by: Nothinman
It's pointless to look at it right now anyway because a lot of the major UI changes haven't happened yet, wait 'till at least beta2.
When you click a link, you get a long, narrow column of tiny text...no one is going to read that.Originally posted by: krsriraman
Originally posted by: ITJunkie
Originally posted by: werk
UGH! Those sections are painful to look at. Terrible design.
Agreed...
Which sections?...I dont get it..
the site seems to be neat and simple yet effective..whats the problem u guys found?
Originally posted by: Ronin
If there's something you want to see with Vista, ask me, and I'll show you what it looks like.
http://server.counter-strike.net/images/misc/vistadesk.png
http://server.counter-strike.net/images/misc/vistadeskicons.png
http://server.counter-strike.net/images/misc/taskman.png
http://server.counter-strike.net/images/misc/filetransfer.png
Originally posted by: Nothinman
It's pointless to look at it right now anyway because a lot of the major UI changes haven't happened yet, wait 'till at least beta2.
Thanks for the screenshots, and thank you for using PNG. It's one of the best things (generally) for simple screenshots.
And it's your opinion. JPG compression stilll screws up the images, which is exactly why I use PNG. If you don't have the connection, don't click the links.
Well I've got "the connection" (100 base/ full duplex) but still don't like the wait/size of the d/l.. but don't let my opinion hurt your feelings. Jeez.Originally posted by: Ronin
And it's your opinion. JPG compression stilll screws up the images, which is exactly why I use PNG. If you don't have the connection, don't click the links.
I was thinkin' the same thing.Originally posted by: Jeff7
It looks like WinXP with a new theme.
It seems that the move from XP to Vista will be more like the transition from 2000 to XP, that is, a little GUI improvment, some security fixes, and some general useability enhancements, but nothing fantastic. Nothing like the 98/ME to 2000 transition.
So is Vista gonna be one of those transition operating systems that everybody passes over (like Windows ME)?
Originally posted by: Ronin
I like the file transfer window. It's cheeky, but you can actually see how fast the data is moving between drives.
Originally posted by: statik213
it looks good, better than the winxp theme.
virtual folders seem promising....
ewww: same old task manager http://server.counter-strike.net/images/misc/taskman.png