Originally posted by: FoBoT
fry her!!
Originally posted by: Don_Vito
I seem to remember reading that she is the only person prosecuted in LA this year for felony shoplifting, and frankly it seems slightly silly to me to expend this amount of time and money on such a minor case. Even if she is convicted she will probably receive community service and/or a fine. I remain dumbstruck by the fact that Peter Guber, who had hired her for three different films, was allowed to stay on the jury. We shall see . . .
Originally posted by: silverpig
Okay, I'm not the most up to speed guy on this whole thing, but didn't they get her shoplifting on the security camera? Seems open and shut to me. Sentencing is what it should come down to.
Originally posted by: Lucky
Originally posted by: silverpig
Okay, I'm not the most up to speed guy on this whole thing, but didn't they get her shoplifting on the security camera? Seems open and shut to me. Sentencing is what it should come down to.
many stars have "open" tabs on clothes; if that was the case (which was one defense) then it's not so simple.
Originally posted by: silverpig
Originally posted by: Lucky
Originally posted by: silverpig
Okay, I'm not the most up to speed guy on this whole thing, but didn't they get her shoplifting on the security camera? Seems open and shut to me. Sentencing is what it should come down to.
many stars have "open" tabs on clothes; if that was the case (which was one defense) then it's not so simple.
What's that mean? They can steal stuff and get away with it?