Witcher 3 system requirements

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Spjut

Senior member
Apr 9, 2011
931
160
106
Maybe those two CPUs where the ones they used as a minimum reference for developing and testing the game ???.

I'd guess that'd be a reasonable explanation. Another recent game to have a huge discrepancy in requirements was Dragon Age Inquisition, requiring an 8800GT for Nvidia, but an HD 4870 for AMD
 
Aug 11, 2008
10,451
642
126
I pretty much ignore system requirements these days. Just goes to show you how much developers really care about PC gamers when they post such meaningless requirements. I am not even sure they know much about PC hardware. Or maybe they just throw out some ludicrously high metric so they can do a lousy job of porting and blame the users for having inadequate hardware.

I expected more from CD Projekt, TBH, but these are some of the most inconsistent requirements I have ever seen. I mean 2500k for minimum, and 3770k for recommended. Dont they even know that they are probably within 10% performance of each other? I suppose it is possible that HT will magically give a huge improvement, but so far we have not seen that, even in newer games with 3770k recommended.

And I have an i5 2320, which technically doesnt even meet the minimum requirements. But does anyone out there really think it is slower than a phenon II x4 at the same clockspeed?

Edit: Since CD Projekt was a PC developer, I also had hoped that the game would scale better to lower end hardware. Maybe it will, but it almost seems like devs are trying to drive users to consoles by making very high system requirements for PC. I got into PC gaming by simply adding a hundred dollar gpu to a cheap i5 desktop. Seems like those days are past.
 
Last edited:

Rvenger

Elite Member <br> Super Moderator <br> Video Cards
Apr 6, 2004
6,283
5
81
AMD does not support deferred context rendering. Here is a screenshot of DirectX Caps viewer that Rvenger took of his R9 290:



Source

As you can see, driver command list support says no.

That's not how PC development works. AMD and NVidia use the same rendering path in the Witcher 3, which is DX11. Only in Mantle supported games does AMD have the capability to use a different rendering path than NVidia.

The only advantage performance wise that Gameworks gives NVidia, is that it allows them earlier access to the game code so they can get a head start on polishing their drivers.


That screenshot is over a year old. I do not have an R9 290 to validate what the Omega drivers state in DX caps viewer so the information you stated above is not relevant to this day.
 
Last edited:

Red Hawk

Diamond Member
Jan 1, 2011
3,266
169
106
Edit: Since CD Projekt was a PC developer, I also had hoped that the game would scale better to lower end hardware. Maybe it will, but it almost seems like devs are trying to drive users to consoles by making very high system requirements for PC. I got into PC gaming by simply adding a hundred dollar gpu to a cheap i5 desktop. Seems like those days are past.

Ok, here's the thing. It sounds like you got into PC gaming when we were well into the last console generation. Games were all being made for those consoles, and PC hardware was far enough past consoles in performance, that you could get a $100 graphics card that would match or exceed the performance of consoles.

But that bar doesn't stay still. We've had a new console generation arrive. Games are being made for those consoles now. You can't sit around complaining that devs are making high system requirements when your graphics card is below the slowest (multiplatform) current generation console. They're not driving you to buy a new console, they're driving you to buy a graphics card that's on par with current consoles. CD Projekt Red has no more obligation to scale to a Radeon HD 7770 than they have to scale back to a Geforce GT 430.

Give it 2-4 years, and I'm sure we'll be back at the point where a $100 graphics card will once again well exceed the performance of the Xbone and PS4. But we aren't there now, and the only thing wrong about it is that you're expecting to run current gen console level games on a graphics card that's below current gen consoles.

That screenshot is over a year old. I do not have an R9 290 to validate what the Omega drivers state in DX caps viewer so the information you stated above is not relevant to this day.

How does that make it not relevant? The Omega drivers should only make a difference if AMD states in the release notes that they've specifically added support for driver command lists.
 
Last edited:

Gryz

Golden Member
Aug 28, 2010
1,551
204
106
Last time I bought a new videocard was when the first high-end 28nm videocard by nVidia was released. I bought a gtx680 on the day of release (March 2012). Awesome decision. The gtx680 is still performing well.

It has been my plan to buy my next videocard when the first high-end 20nm videocard by nVidia will be released. A new videocard would be nice when playing The Witcher 3.

So when is the first next-gen nVidia videocard expected ?

Any chance this will be before June 2015 ? (So I can play TW3 on a 20nm videocard ?)

Is there any truth to the rumor that nVidia will wait until mid-2016 and 16nm ? That would be crazy, imho. And disappointing.
 

skipsneeky2

Diamond Member
May 21, 2011
5,035
1
71
Last time I bought a new videocard was when the first high-end 28nm videocard by nVidia was released. I bought a gtx680 on the day of release (March 2012). Awesome decision. The gtx680 is still performing well.

2 and half whole years it took for 980/970 to release after 680 came out,i think the wait between G80 to GT200 was a lesser of a wait lol. 8800GTS 512MB to gtx280 was quite nice.I don't think any other series has came close off the top of my head.
 
Last edited:

Lepton87

Platinum Member
Jul 28, 2009
2,544
9
81
Last time I bought a new videocard was when the first high-end 28nm videocard by nVidia was released. I bought a gtx680 on the day of release (March 2012). Awesome decision. The gtx680 is still performing well.

It has been my plan to buy my next videocard when the first high-end 20nm videocard by nVidia will be released. A new videocard would be nice when playing The Witcher 3.

So when is the first next-gen nVidia videocard expected ?

Any chance this will be before June 2015 ? (So I can play TW3 on a 20nm videocard ?)

Is there any truth to the rumor that nVidia will wait until mid-2016 and 16nm ? That would be crazy, imho. And disappointing.

Buying 7970 at launch would be even better as it's a better card, 2GB is pathetic. I'm going to buy the first true high-end card made at 20nm, both GK104 and tahiti were midrange especially GK104.
 

Gryz

Golden Member
Aug 28, 2010
1,551
204
106
I forgot I was on anandtech. People arguing whether AMD or nVidia is better. People arguing whether a certain card deserves the term "high-end" or not, even when it's the fastest card on the market at the time. Bleh. That was not the question.

My question is simple:

Do we expect 20nm videocards before the release of The Witcher 3, yes or no ?
 

Red Hawk

Diamond Member
Jan 1, 2011
3,266
169
106
I forgot I was on anandtech. People arguing whether AMD or nVidia is better. People arguing whether a certain card deserves the term "high-end" or not, even when it's the fastest card on the market at the time. Bleh. That was not the question.

My question is simple:

Do we expect 20nm videocards before the release of The Witcher 3, yes or no ?

It's possible enough that I would wait right up until the release of TW3 to make a purchase.
 

KaRLiToS

Golden Member
Jul 30, 2010
1,918
11
81
I forgot I was on anandtech. People arguing whether AMD or nVidia is better. People arguing whether a certain card deserves the term "high-end" or not, even when it's the fastest card on the market at the time. Bleh. That was not the question.

My question is simple:

Do we expect 20nm videocards before the release of The Witcher 3, yes or no ?

This is a lot of valid reasons to avoid this section. I'm also really tired to see all those redundant debates. Just enjoy your system and the games you are playing.
 
Last edited:

bystander36

Diamond Member
Apr 1, 2013
5,154
132
106
Buying 7970 at launch would be even better as it's a better card, 2GB is pathetic. I'm going to buy the first true high-end card made at 20nm, both GK104 and tahiti were midrange especially GK104.

Of course 7970's at launch were a lot more expensive (seems odd that AMD was more expensive then), and the reference coolers weren't very good.
 

RussianSensation

Elite Member
Sep 5, 2003
19,458
765
126
I forgot I was on anandtech. People arguing whether AMD or nVidia is better. People arguing whether a certain card deserves the term "high-end" or not, even when it's the fastest card on the market at the time. Bleh. That was not the question.

My question is simple:

Do we expect 20nm videocards before the release of The Witcher 3, yes or no ?

Most likely AMD and NV are skipping 20nm. That doesn't mean we won't see faster than 980 level of performance from either camp by May/June 2015. If you held on this long to your 680, you might as well wait all the way until Witcher 3 comes out in hopes that either 980 falls in price or something much faster if out at $550-600 by then. It might be the case that NV even bundles TW3 with its new cards since it's a GW title -- another bonus for waiting to upgrade until then
 
Aug 11, 2008
10,451
642
126
Ok, here's the thing. It sounds like you got into PC gaming when we were well into the last console generation. Games were all being made for those consoles, and PC hardware was far enough past consoles in performance, that you could get a $100 graphics card that would match or exceed the performance of consoles.

But that bar doesn't stay still. We've had a new console generation arrive. Games are being made for those consoles now. You can't sit around complaining that devs are making high system requirements when your graphics card is below the slowest (multiplatform) current generation console. They're not driving you to buy a new console, they're driving you to buy a graphics card that's on par with current consoles. CD Projekt Red has no more obligation to scale to a Radeon HD 7770 than they have to scale back to a Geforce GT 430.

Give it 2-4 years, and I'm sure we'll be back at the point where a $100 graphics card will once again well exceed the performance of the Xbone and PS4. But we aren't there now, and the only thing wrong about it is that you're expecting to run current gen console level games on a graphics card that's below current gen consoles.



How does that make it not relevant? The Omega drivers should only make a difference if AMD states in the release notes that they've specifically added support for driver command lists.

You have a point, but I still think it is unfortunate that there is not better scaling to lower end (or even mid range) hardware. They may have no "obligation" to scale to low end hardware, but OTOH, I think it is a bad thing for the popularity of PC gaming when it takes almost a top of the line cpu to meet the recommended specs, and a strong midrange one to meet minimum specs. As far as running current gen games on lower powered hardware than the consoles, isn't that what PC gaming is all about-- games are supposed to be able to adapt to a wide variety of hardware.

Personally, I will just play older games. But I do think the steep escalation in hardware requirements is going to deter a fair number of people from getting into PC gaming, which I think is unfortunate.
 

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
Personally, I will just play older games. But I do think the steep escalation in hardware requirements is going to deter a fair number of people from getting into PC gaming, which I think is unfortunate.

This jump we going to happen once development began focusing on the 8th gen consoles. People were just spoiled with a decade on the 360/PS3 and got comfortable with a very slow, slight uptick in requirements between games. Now, developers are unchained from 256MBs of RAM, single core CPUs, and 10 year old GPUs. As such, we're now seeing the logical jump in requirements.

As far as putting people off from PC gaming? False. Most of the system requirements are easily affordable hardware.
 

Lepton87

Platinum Member
Jul 28, 2009
2,544
9
81
Of course 7970's at launch were a lot more expensive (seems odd that AMD was more expensive then), and the reference coolers weren't very good.

Not in Europe, I forgot the US was different. Reference coolers were really utter crap, that was one of the reasons I returned my pair of 7970s. I can't imagine they ruined such a good silicon with such pathetic coolers. greatnoob also if you accuse someone of thread-crapping don't do it yourself because it makes you seem like a hypocrite. How does your satisfaction with buying a 680 has anything to do with Witcher 3? Everything what was pertinent to the topic was said much earlier. there's nothing else to add you started a discussion that was completely off-topic and now you are crying foul. calling the kettle black. Pathetic behavior. If you start an off-topic discussion what do you expect? You are just captious. If you think saying one card is better than the other is somehow meant to cause a flame war I don't even know what to say. You have to defend your precious brand don't you? I don't care about the brand of my card... But some people are just irrational and treat them like football teams. That's really unhealthy both corporations only want our money nothing else, they are not our friends.

ps. It no secret that GK104 tanks hard in new games like DA:I, shadow of mordor etc. so why would witcher 3 be any different?



I just can't believe that 680/770 would be comparable to R290 or even 280X.
 
Last edited:

escrow4

Diamond Member
Feb 4, 2013
3,339
122
106
"Easily affordable" is not a term I normally associate with an i7.

Depends on the person. I put i7s in my office PCs and hexa's in my gaming boxes. If you can't afford it, there is always console. Its about time hardware was properly used.
 

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
My question is simple:

Do we expect 20nm videocards before the release of The Witcher 3, yes or no ?

Signs point to yes, but you should also wait until after the release of TW3 before making a purchase. Same holds true for anyone looking to upgrade for a single game; wait until the game is released before buying. People who bought the dual core Pentium G3xx8 to OC it probably felt a little buyers remorse when dual core CPUs dropped from gaming in 2014.


"Easily affordable" is not a term I normally associate with an i7.

A 3 generation old i7. And ~300 dollars isn't exactly obscenely priced for current gen i7. But an i7 isn't required either, just recommended.


Most likely AMD and NV are skipping 20nm.

Do you have any credible links to back this up? You make this statement often, but every leak, rumor, foundry press release, and product release all point to 20nm parts in 2015. AMD's flatly stated they will be shipping 20nm skus of something in 2015, Nvidia is shipping 20nm parts right now in the Tegra X1, etc.
 

greatnoob

Senior member
Jan 6, 2014
968
395
136
greatnoob also if you accuse someone of thread-crapping don't do it yourself because it makes you seem like a hypocrite. How does your satisfaction with buying a 680 has anything to do with Witcher 3? Everything what was pertinent to the topic was said much earlier.
If you think saying one card is better than the other is somehow meant to cause a flame war I don't even know what to say. You have to defend your precious brand don't you? I don't care about the brand of my card... But some people are just irrational and treat them like football teams. That's really unhealthy both corporations only want our money nothing else, they are not our friends.

You are right, when I read your posts I took it in a way that you were just trying to bag Nvidia. I re-read your post and I understand what you're trying to say in context of Witcher 3. So I apologise for my post.
 

Lepton87

Platinum Member
Jul 28, 2009
2,544
9
81
You are right, when I read your posts I took it in a way that you were just trying to bag Nvidia. I re-read your post and I understand what you're trying to say in context of Witcher 3. So I apologise for my post.

Ok, apologizes accepted.
 

djimty

Junior Member
Jan 8, 2015
3
0
0
Guess I have to upgrade my GPU . Currently running on a 2500k with a AMD 6950 but I'm in two minds to what I should upgrade the GPU to either a 290 (as you can pick them up relatively cheap) or the 970. Bare in mind I don't want to spend too much...
 

Attic

Diamond Member
Jan 9, 2010
4,282
2
76
Guess I have to upgrade my GPU . Currently running on a 2500k with a AMD 6950 but I'm in two minds to what I should upgrade the GPU to either a 290 (as you can pick them up relatively cheap) or the 970. Bare in mind I don't want to spend too much...

A lot of folks in same place. For Witcher 3 it's worth waiting closer to release.

1) Witcher 3 is one of very few games worth upgrading GPU for
2) W3 still a ways off.
 

shady28

Platinum Member
Apr 11, 2004
2,520
397
126
Well, if Witcher 3 is anything like Witcher 2, it will like a lot of CPU.





 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |