Perknose,
In charging me "anti semite" you go w i l d l y wrong, and I know that YOU ALREADY KNOW THAT. You're just reaching to make a splash.
Also, nothing I posted was "crude" as you said it was, so you're also wrong in calling names that I was "crude." What you posted is simply not true. Don't give reason for spectators here to call you "FOOL."
Again...it's because you seem to react from your gut. A MODERATOR has to be above that.
I've worked a lot in Israel, possibly even a few years longer than you have, and
I personally have placed huge contracts from USA tocompanied located in Israel like IAI and Motorola and Elbit , stay tuned plenty more really big one$ to come. Here I prove, yet again, that your eruptive gut reactions are just dead W R O N G. You are wrong in mis-labeling me anti-Semite, just as you also are often (more than 50%?) wrong in your many other "judgements" you've posted around AT, which, by the way, you seem to relish doing. You flail around these forums hurting people, usually because YOU ARE WRONGHEADED. Man, if you're gonna be a "power wielder" then you've GOT to relax and be WA Y more tolerant, because, you are NOT anyone competent to judge, in other polite words, no offense, you are NOT the smartest guy in these forums.
You are dead wrong. No,
as proved in the above para, I am NOT anti-semite.
Yet again, as previously, I forgive you sympathetically because you plainly, obviously suffer mental weakness from snorting PERC
(very powerful cleaning solvent Perchloroethelyne) up your nose. Usually I don't truck druggies but apparently at Anandtech you somehow achieved ascendency and wield a fairy-wand of "p o w e r." How could a PERC snorter get validated by Anandtech? Too wrong, too off base, too weird, utterly wrong. Do you curl up fetal in your bed lost in PERC-fumed illusions then post random accusations here, often wrong?
The POINT is,
I PERSONALLY have put several hundred millions of $ of workload into ISRAEL, over a long time window, and
I AM F A R from anti-semite, which means the "judgement" you posted labeling me anti-semite is stupidly wrongheaded, and just plain unfounded, and wrong.
It's true that I don't think the silly, virtually unproven fashion model chic in a padded-out suit in that movie did as good a job as the thoroughly--proven and vastly more beautiful actress, with a real figure, Bridget Regan, could have done. It's true that I believe the Israeli chic got her role because of Jewish affiliation. The reason for thinking so is that my daughter is a nearly-top-level movie producer close to it (works w/ Julia Roberts, Bradley Cooper, lots more at that echelon) told me so. In Hollyweird it's a known fact. Maybe not known where you may be. Has absolutely NOTHING to do with anti-Semitiism...based on frankly unfair bias by Jewish producers trying to throw $ to Israel...to me that's a true FACT. Absolutely nothing anti-Semite about it.
Also, you may not believe it but I was here on this forum way earlier than you, beforte it even had a GUI, then I left to go work in Europe a few years then came back with different user ID. So in a sense I feel I have more equity her than some PERC snorting druggie who wrongly says bad things about me or others.
It is suggested that you refrain from going off on your gut emotions, so we on here don't see you a fool.
As for the root cause of this exchange, that movie, I happen to personally think the (back in that younger time) exceptionally beautiful, accomplished Bridget Regan should have been chosen to play WW, because she would have been better by every objective measure (way prettier, way more actress experience, less movie-finance risk) but lost out because of Hollyweird-Jewish agenda stuff. That's simply TRUE.
Relax Perky. You're wheels aren't coming off. Knock off your habitual throwing of your WRONG accusations. As a PERC maybe you can find peace by hitting another snort of your PERC drug up y'er nose.
Perknose,
There is no place for your crude anti-semitism on these forums.
Perknose
Forum Director[/QUOTE]
Bridget Regan, beautiful American with excellent actressing chops and a genuine figure, plus high intelligence, poise, and TRUE BEAUTY, ought to have been cast in the movie lead
but popsicle-stick Gal Gadot got in there for simple sake of her Jewishness. The Hollyweird producers channelled the mony and fame to their home cause - Israel.
Based on ACTRESSING, Bridget Regan ought to have been cast as the lady who will influence future generations of little girls.
There is no place for your crude anti-semitism on these forums.
Perknose
Forum Director
Bridget Regan, beautiful American with excellent actressing chops and a genuine figure, plus high intelligence, poise, and TRUE BEAUTY, ought to have been cast in the movie lead
but popsicle-stick Gal Gadot got in there for simple sake of her Jewishness. The Hollyweird producers channelled the mony and fame to their home cause - Israel.
Based on ACTRESSING, Bridget Regan ought to have been cast as the lady who will influence future generations of little girls.
There is no place for your crude anti-semitism on these forums.
Perknose
Forum Director
This is a missed mod callout but is completely in the same callout vein as the one this 2/21.
esquared
Anandtech Forum Director