should you even be posting about the circumstances on these forums?
He's been found not guilty. He didn't commit a crime so he can talk about it all he wants, hell even if he did he can't be tried again due to double jeopardy,.
He just admitted to carrying an illegally concealed weapon. How is that not a crime.
i already explained that. it's on page 2.
but here i'll c/p
the lawyer said something about that. it was a long time ago but i think it had to do with having to prosecute the most severe crime first. after i was found not guilty on that charge they can't really charge me with carrying a concealed weapon cuz that would be an attempt to circumvent my right to self defense. had they tried it would have gone to the state supreme court and wisconsin would had become an unregulated concealed carry state. i proved my use of lethal force in self defense. they cannot then say i had no right having possesion of lethal force, not without losing another case anyway
yep. well, maybe if they've changed that much about concealed carry then it could be a whole other ball of wax by now.
He just admitted to carrying an illegally concealed weapon. How is that not a crime, and was he tried for that? Don't get me wrong I'm glad he apparently used it wisely and that's all I need to let him keep carrying it, but I'm not the law.
I've never heard of internet forum postings being admissible in court.
They probably would have if i had answered any of their questions. i used my rights at the interrogation table. that's why they went for the nuts. "Oh this guy thinks He Knows His Rights, huh?" "You just read them to me dickhead."
the lawyer said something about that. it was a long time ago but i think it had to do with having to prosecute the most severe crime first. after i was found not guilty on that charge they can't really charge me with carrying a concealed weapon cuz that would be an attempt to circumvent my right to self defense. had they tried it would have gone to the state supreme court and wisconsin would had become an unregulated concealed carry state. i proved my use of lethal force in self defense. they cannot then say i had no right having possesion of lethal force, not without losing another case anyway
or something like that.
Although it sounds like the gun saved his life I really must ask, what is someone with schizoaffective disorder doing with a gun? I don't know the severity of your brothers condition and please don't take this the wrong way, but from my quick google search on it, could he even legally own/carry a gun?
yep hello. sry it took me so long. there are so many of these threads in so many places and i find them every now and then. this one happened to be started by someone claming to be my brother :/ pretty sure he never told me about it. prolly cuz he talks about crying
<--- necro
Wait, what? I'm missing something. So someone you don't know posted about you and your circumstances a few years ago, stating you were their brother, and now you open account with the same MrXyz title to discuss it further? How did you even find this thread?
google. like i said i find these things here and there every now and then.
Was there any concern that it wasn't cut and dry as the case proceeded?
Wow, it's just so random, you should pm MrColin to ask him who he is, how he knows you and why he claims to be your bro.
Do you even have a brother?
not quite, you're not supposed to make warning shots before using it. to even carry a concealed weapon no one can even know you have it. naa makes some nice stuff. even after i pulled it and fired 2 warning shots the only people who knew i even had it were the 3 bags of shit to whom i was giving a second chance.Conceled carry isn't about taking the law into your hands, it is about protecting yourself when there are no other options. It is supposed to be the last option when it comes to defending yourself.