So at least you are admitting that there is a problem. But it seems you find issue with the label put on the issue. Yes, if there were no consoles, we would call it something else. but it doesn't invalidate the fact that there is a problem. And for lack of a better label, the community in general chooses to call it "Consolization".
Now you also said that if everyone had "Super computers" the problem would remain. And here i think you are missing the mark. The problem is (as I see it) that the larger market is on the less powerful platform, and hence limiting a segment of the market from realizing the full potential of that platform. In this, if you were to level the playing field, people might complain, but the arguments would be of a whole different nature. And therefore would be a separate issue entirely (IMHO).
Not really, I don't find it to be a problem because I don't have enough hours in the day to even play all the games I want to in a given year anyway, not to mention plenty from the last decade and further back I still have just sitting. But even if I did, I still don't think it's a problem, I think it's simply the way it is. It's to be expected. I am simply trying to provide an explanation, personally I think it's a benefit that it's becoming more mainstream. Hell when I was a kid I was a nerd for playing video games and only 2 kids in my 5th grade had an N64. Now as long as you don't let it consume you, it's quite socially accepted. I consider it an improvement.
And the fact that it's poorly defined and little more than misnomer is part of the problem I've had all along. Like I said, people bandy the term about and use it to mean anything and everything they want it to, as such consoles have suddenly become the 'bane' of PC gaming. Basically it's placing blame where it doesn't belong, and in fact, there's little to blame anyway. Because you get rid of the consoles, and these same things will still happen.
You can't blame the console producers for making something that isn't bleeding edge, it's bad business. Personally I don't, but I'm sure some will regardless, blame the game producers for wanting their games to be playable by and enjoyable to a wider audience. I mean there are no perfect games from any year/era/genre/platform, but in spite of everything that's supposedly "wrong" with the industry we still have a lot of incredible games to play. Even multiplatform titles. Even console exclusive titles. And even PC exclusive titles.
Giving everyone super computers would just mean that farmville and addictinggames load faster. Most people wouldn't even realize they had a supercomputer if they had one, the only reasonable change that I could possibly see happening is the lowest common denominator level of graphics would increase marginally, but I think expecting them to leap is unrealistic, because ultimately hardware is not the only limitation, it is but one. Time, manpower, and funding all bottleneck development, and just because every consumer would have a computer that could render pretty high res textures and high poly models and deep backdrops does not mean that the resources to produce any of those exist.
"Consolization" is simply part of what's happening as a result of market changes at work, it's not a root cause itself. When a hurricane comes, it rains. The rain is "consolization" and it can still move the soil around, but it's not the root cause. The hurricane, the changing market, is.