alkemyst
No Lifer
- Feb 13, 2001
- 83,769
- 19
- 81
The consummate internet tough guy right here folks.
the internet fat guy here folks.
What happened to your weight loss sig, big boy?
The consummate internet tough guy right here folks.
I believe most above that say they block traffic only wish they could. lolz. usually it only takes me coming up behind. A few times I have to dip my lights.
The funny part is when I pass beeping at them and lunging at their car like a ravenous beast, they pull right over and stay there probably trying to find a napkin to clean up their piss and shit.
The consummate internet tough guy right here folks.
How does the hov lane fit into this discussion? It's often the left-most lane but not considered as such when it comes to passing, right?
Understand I don't usually deal with hov lanes so this is more of a curiosity when traveling through places that do have them.
HOV lanes are separate. Where you have them the leftmost lane is to the right of them.
this is simple.
There are safe ways to change lanes and there are unsafe ways to change lanes. I'm not talking about weaving in and out like an asshole, I'm talking about getting the fuck over to the right if you aren't passing someone. Someone that drives 65 in the middle lane next to someone else driving 65 in the slow lane is an asshole, plain and simple. Speed up a bit and get in front or slow down for a second and get in behind him. If you disagree your parents have failed miserably at training you how to drive like you have to share the road with everyone else.lawlz, this guy thinks that changing lanes regularly can be just as safe in the aggregate as staying on one lane.
Turns out that increasing the number of low-likelihood dangerous events leads to an aggregate increase in said events!
There are laws and then there is common courtesy for everyone else on the road.You're just flat out wrong.
http://www.dol.wa.gov/driverslicense/docs/driverguide-en.pdf
So, exactly what I said is true, and what you said is an ignorant, pitiable, self-centered prick view that essentially ruins the world for people who are good enough human beings to actually deserve to continue breathing.
Have a nice day.
around here people with big trucks or 18 wheelers will often move to the middle and block both lanes
if only people were properly trained to use the 'zipper merge'
http://youtu.be/ZcPby71TNC0
Ease the flow of traffic? That's why there are signs 4 miles before the merge happens. People are well aware the lane is closed 4 miles ahead. If everyone got over with a continuous flow of traffic in one lane, there wouldn't be an issue. That's the point of the signs. People cutting others off where the yield actually happens is what stops traffic. Or maybe it's my frail ego. Yea, that's what it is...
Link me to another poll like this one.Oh god! Not this tired thread again.
hahahah!the internet fat guy here folks.
Thanks for asking! I started off around 58 waste line, i'm down to 48. I started this Ph.D. program and kept the weight steady, but for the last month I've been back on a more aggressive exercise program and I'm feeling quite healthy.What happened to your weight loss sig
hahahah!
How's that 160 IQ rocking out for you? Helping you shoot roids the "right way" and call "road rage" in to the cops?
There are safe ways to change lanes and there are unsafe ways to change lanes. I'm not talking about weaving in and out like an asshole, I'm talking about getting the fuck over to the right if you aren't passing someone. Someone that drives 65 in the middle lane next to someone else driving 65 in the slow lane is an asshole, plain and simple. Speed up a bit and get in front or slow down for a second and get in behind him. If you disagree your parents have failed miserably at training you how to drive like you have to share the road with everyone else.
There are laws and then there is common courtesy for everyone else on the road.
Ease the flow of traffic? That's why there are signs 4 miles before the merge happens. People are well aware the lane is closed 4 miles ahead. If everyone got over with a continuous flow of traffic in one lane, there wouldn't be an issue. That's the point of the signs. People cutting others off where the yield actually happens is what stops traffic. Or maybe it's my frail ego. Yea, that's what it is...
hahahah!
Wow you can't use the word consummate because you're afraid you might use it wrong.
Nice.
How's that 160 IQ rocking out for you? Helping you shoot roids the "right way" and call "road rage" in to the cops?
Do you have any idea how petty and ignorant you look? My bet is you don't care.
Thanks for asking! I started off around 58 waste line, i'm down to 48. I started this Ph.D. program and kept the weight steady, but for the last month I've been back on a more aggressive exercise program and I'm feeling quite healthy.
But on topic:
What exactly constitutes "road rage" enough for you to call it in? Give some examples where someone drives poorly but you don't call it in, tough guy.
Why in the world would you get in the line with 50 people in it?
I can't believe there needed to be a "study" for this. I thought it was obvious, and I really hate people who try to merge 1/2 mile before the lane cuts off. They're morons.
So not holding up everyone else on the highway is what you call ignorant, selfish and stupid? :hmm:Yes, and we have a country of laws, not courtesy. There are no fines or punishments for not being 'courteous' (especially when what you call courtesy I call ignorance, selfishness, and stupidity)...no down side at all really. The same is not true of laws however. When there are reasonable laws on the books, and you choose not to follow them, you are in the wrong. You have the right to be wrong and accept your punishment, but you're still wrong.
So not holding up everyone else on the highway is what you call ignorant, selfish and stupid? :hmm:
However; my statement is road rage / dangerous are those weaving left to right and doing brake checks in the passing lane.
I usually don't argue with those on welfare.
However; my statement is road rage / dangerous are those weaving left to right and doing brake checks in the passing lane.
Define your terms, because as defined by most ethical perspectives the law has little to do with being a better or 'worse' human being.Thinking you need to go faster than the posted speed limit is ignorant, selfish, and stupid. Every person who does it is inherently a worse human being than those that don't. You are not special. You have no right to get anywhere faster than anyone else. If you don't want to be a part of society, then leave it utterly and quit draining its resources from those of us who participate.
So when you gum up the lanes, that is you abusing the power you have when you are behind the wheel? Some sort of god complex? If you want to stop speeders, maybe you should become a cop. If you don't want to become a cop, maybe you should just mind your own business.Thinking you need to go faster than the posted speed limit is ignorant, selfish, and stupid. Every person who does it is inherently a worse human being than those that don't. You are not special. You have no right to get anywhere faster than anyone else. If you don't want to be a part of society, then leave it utterly and quit draining its resources from those of us who participate.
Thinking you need to go faster than the posted speed limit is ignorant, selfish, and stupid. Every person who does it is inherently a worse human being than those that don't. You are not special. You have no right to get anywhere faster than anyone else. If you don't want to be a part of society, then leave it utterly and quit draining its resources from those of us who participate.