Except that "slow traffic keep right" is both a law and suggestion. Sorry, bud, but you are wrong, ignorant, and selfish.
No, I shouldn't. I should be obeying the law and the suggested driving methods, which say I should do exactly what I do. YOU and people like you are wrong, and its because you're ignorant, selfish assholes. 100%.
I leave and find out what went wrong in my life that I'm spending time with crack-addicts.
There's a thread on shitty metaphors around here somewhere.
that's just you wrestling with the realization that you are an epic douche. Because you know if you pick #1 it makes you a hypocrite, and #2 makes you a douche. ANd #2 is what you keep defending in this thread.
... You seriously can't read and see that I'm disagreeing with PoW !?that's just you wrestling with the realization that you are an epic douche. Because you know if you pick #1 it makes you a hypocrite, and #2 makes you a douche. ANd #2 is what you keep defending in this thread.
Dixy said:Failing to follow this law does not preclude you from being enlightened, egalitarian nor does it preclude personal affabilityPoW! said:YOU and people like you are wrong, and its because you're ignorant, selfish assholes.
No, I shouldn't. I should be obeying the law and the suggested driving methods, which say I should do exactly what I do. YOU and people like you are wrong, and its because you're ignorant, selfish assholes. 100%.
I'm convinced that you're just trolling. No one can be this douchey.
I bet you get white knuckles when you approach the highway speed limit.No, I shouldn't. I should be obeying the law and the suggested driving methods, which say I should do exactly what I do. YOU and people like you are wrong, and its because you're ignorant, selfish assholes. 100%.
umm, hey bro...about umm, like everywhere, suggested driving methods state slower traffic stay right bro.
just sayin'
Except that "slow traffic keep right" is both a law and suggestion. Sorry, bud, but you are wrong, ignorant, and selfish.
I'm convinced that you're just trolling. No one can be this douchey.
I bet you get white knuckles when you approach the highway speed limit.
I already posted the drivers guide for Washington which explicitly states that on 3+ lane roads the right most lane is for trucks, exits, and slower than speed limit vehicles, the middle is for vehicles traveling faster than them (ie the speed limit), and the left for passing only. It also clearly states that it is the responsibility of PASSING vehicles to change lanes, not those traveling at speed.
So, you're flat out wrong. At least in many states.
'Slow traffic' is trucks, exiting, and those traveling UNDER the speed limit. Period. I have already linked the drivers manual which fully supports everything I have said. It's not my problem if you all are too fucking ignorant, selfish, and stupid to follow it.
sorry, brah; totally right here. You simply lack reading comprehension.
However; we are all fortunate to know you are too timid for the highway in reality.
Semicolons make you so smart.
sorry, brah; totally right here. You simply lack reading comprehension.
However; we are all fortunate to know you are too timid for the highway in reality.
No. Slow traffic is traffic that slower than the flow of traffic. I have had drivers licenses in a handful of states and this is always the wording. Since you do not like this legal interpretation, how about we go with "slow thinkers, keep right". This means you drive in the ditch to the right of the highway.
Again, please provide for me official documentation of this interpretation. I want manuals of traffic safety from the state, court decisions, etc. Show me something other than ignorant, selfish assholes claiming personal privilege.
Which is a worse human being in your opinion, a pedophile that has never once exceeded the speed limit in his entire life, or you (having admitted on the record that you have in fact exceeded the posted speed limit at least 3 times not even including accidents)? I mean, you indulged in speeding at least three times, therefore you are an inherently worse human being than the pedo who has never once exceeded the speed limit. I guess it's a good thing the entire sane world doesn't agree with your ridiculous position, otherwise your cornhole would be in trouble.I must rise to meet the level of douchery of those who speed for pricks sake. I am 100% serious however. I almost never speed (maybe 3-5 times in my life), except by accident. I follow traffic laws to a level that would make the OCD champ say 'holy shit'. I absolutely believe that 100% of the speeding mentality is ignorance, selfishness, and stupidity, and that people who indulge in it are inherently worse human beings than those who don't.
Which is a worse human being in your opinion, a pedophile that has never once exceeded the speed limit in his entire life, or you (having admitted on the record that you have in fact exceeded the posted speed limit at least 3 times not even including accidents)? I mean, you indulged in speeding at least three times, therefore you are an inherently worse human being than the pedo who has never once exceeded the speed limit. I guess it's a good thing the entire sane world doesn't agree with your ridiculous position, otherwise your cornhole would be in trouble.
why the law? Was 60mph ignorant selfish and assholish at one point, because it was the law to go 55, then it turned into an enlighten, selfless, friendly speed to go? Even if the actual speed of the traffic and level of traffic hazard you create by driving that speed doesn't change: just because some paper somewhere said "don't do it"?
I think you are just lashing out because you can't handle the guilt of having exceeded the speed limit not once, not twice, but three times or (gasp!) maybe even more and that doesn't even count the times you 'accidentally' exceeded the speed limit without noticing because god knows when you are traveling at such high rates of speed taking your eyes off the road to glance at your speedometer is inviting certain death so how could you possibly know how many thousands of times you may have actually exceeded the speed limit but I digress the point is I forgive you your trespasses go in peace brother in the rightmost lane TY.My God...how do you carry on even autonomous functions with the functional IQ of a kumquat?
Not only is that among the worst analogies ever attempted, but it has nothing to do with what we were talking about. We weren't making ranked comparisons as to the quality of a human being in light of various offenses, we were specifically looking at comparisons only between those who obey rules/laws designed for societal continuance, and those who don't. Therefore the only possible way to make your comparison applicable would be to ask if I found people who broke the law and had sex with children were worse human beings than those who obeyed the law and didn't. My answer is yes, I think those who rape children are worse than those who don't...just like people who speed are worse than those who don't. It's still a GOD AWFUL comparison, but at least now it's rationally/logically equivalent to my original statements.
I think you are just lashing out because you can't handle the guilt of having exceeded the speed limit not once, not twice, but three times or (gasp!) maybe even more and that doesn't even count the times you 'accidentally' exceeded the speed limit without noticing because god knows when you are traveling at such high rates of speed taking your eyes off the road to glance at your speedometer is inviting certain death so how could you possibly know how many thousands of times you may have actually exceeded the speed limit but I digress the point is I forgive you your trespasses go in peace brother in the rightmost lane TY.