Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: Strk
Originally posted by: preslove
No, it's a stupid philosophy. It's just as looney as communism.
Why?
And yeah, I would. Sadly, my state kind of would make an issue about it really counting. I could help with the whole 5% thing though, I suppose.
They are two sides of the same coin, extremist philosophies that elevate one part of society over all others. Communists believe that the state and only the state should make the decisions for society. Libertarianism merely replaces the "state" with private business. The truth is that reality lies in between the two extremes of these world views and that wholesale adoption of either one quickly leads to problems. The state is much better at addressing some issues, while a market is often better than the state at others. I want a leader who will actually think and try to make intelligent decisions using a combination of state and market, instead of just relying on some ideology to make the decision.
Rabid ideologues are bad, mmmmmkay? Compromise is good.
If one idea could magically solve all our problems we would have adopted it already.