wow the Swedes really "LOVE" their animals if you know what I mean.....

[freegeeks]

what can you expect from a right-wing fundamentalist christian website


sewer journalism is the right word here - read some other pieces from that a**hole
he clearly hates muslims, gays etc...

 

[SociallyChallenged]

Originally posted by: poopaskoopa
Ewww..... Am I the only one who saw the "liberal = gay sex = animal sex" tone of the article?

Indeed...That's some freaky crap (0.o)

 

[kt]

Originally posted by: MacBaine

Originally posted by: kt

Originally posted by: MacBaine

Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever

Originally posted by: kt
I love how you guys stereotype the whole nation population based on a few individuals.

I like how you stereotype this whole forum based on a few individuals.

Sucka got Served!

Idiot!

At least you're taking it in style Mr. Pro-Animal sex

I love how YOU, Mr. MacBaine, can make assumptions out of nothingness.

 

[Kadarin]

Originally posted by: MacBaine

Originally posted by: no0b
After reading the first 2 paragraphs I realized that it was biased as hell and stopped reading it.

Care to give us your take on it, provided your pro-animal sex stance?

One problem I have with the "article" (it's not an "article", but rather more of an op-ed) is that it automatically equates animal sex with abuse, talking about the "poor, defenseless" animals that are always being treated by veterinarians. Note the quote "Veterinarians project that when they come upon animals injured, every 20th dog or cat receiving treatment is because of the "the animal... inflicted... as a result of sexual assault."" This is VERY bad journalism- not only is there no source attributed to this quote, but whatever was said by whoever said if in fact anyone actually said it was deliberately mangled to fit the tone of the article.

Is sex with animals always abusive toward these "poor, defenseless" animals? If you have ever downloaded animal porn, you can note that in pretty much every single case, the animals are not only willing, but very enthusiastic participants.

 

[samgau]

Originally posted by: freegeeks
what can you expect from a right-wing fundamentalist christian website


sewer journalism is the right word here - read some other pieces from that a**hole
he clearly hates muslims, gays etc...

His stance is that the swedes akin to liberals are all into morally reprehensible behavior... wow talk about bias..

 

[mcveigh]

Originally posted by: Astaroth33

Originally posted by: MacBaine

Originally posted by: no0b
After reading the first 2 paragraphs I realized that it was biased as hell and stopped reading it.

Care to give us your take on it, provided your pro-animal sex stance?

One problem I have with the "article" (it's not an "article", but rather more of an op-ed) is that it automatically equates animal sex with abuse, talking about the "poor, defenseless" animals that are always being treated by veterinarians. Note the quote "Veterinarians project that when they come upon animals injured, every 20th dog or cat receiving treatment is because of the "the animal... inflicted... as a result of sexual assault."" This is VERY bad journalism- not only is there no source attributed to this quote, but whatever was said by whoever said if in fact anyone actually said it was deliberately mangled to fit the tone of the article.

Is sex with animals always abusive toward these "poor, defenseless" animals? If you have ever downloaded animal porn, you can note that in pretty much every single case, the animals are not only willing, but very enthusiastic participants.

I'm not saying sex with animals hurts animals..i'm saying IT'S WRONG!!!

 

[JulesMaximus]

Originally posted by: poopaskoopa
Ewww..... Am I the only one who saw the "liberal = gay sex = animal sex" tone of the article?

What do you expect from a source like that? Did you see any of the other headlines on that page? Looks like a very obvious religious conservative slant to me. Frankly, I question the validity of the article based on that alone. One in ten animals brought in to a Vet in Sweden shows signs of sexual abuse? Come on...That's ridiculous.

 

[Sid59]

"It is estimated that from 200 to 300 animals are hurt anally because of sex with humans." - ewwww .. well it was annually but this is better

 

[Wuffsunie]

Originally posted by: JulesMaximus

Originally posted by: poopaskoopa
Ewww..... Am I the only one who saw the "liberal = gay sex = animal sex" tone of the article?

What do you expect from a source like that? Did you see any of the other headlines on that page? Looks like a very obvious religious conservative slant to me.

No kidding :disgust: The other headlines are pathetic! The site looks like a clearing house for right-wing, religious-based political propaganda.

For the article in question, just look at the numbers. If "1 in 20 dogs or cats" is treated by vets for this and that accounts for "200 to 300 animals ... hurt annually" then Sweden must have a grand total of like 4000 to 6000 pets in the whole damned country. Then again the owner of that site is a defender of Bush's WMD policies, so we know math isn't one of his strong suits.

 

[no0b]

Thank god someother people see the bias I saw.

 

[nCred]

yeah, right, I´m sure there´s a lot more animal abusers in Sweden then in other countries.

There´s about the same % of sick people in every county.
It IS illegal to have sex with animals in Sweden, it´s called cruelty against animal. All the other "facts" are probably fake too.

What a stupid and incorrect article.

 

[mcveigh]

I edited my origianl post to include the source story from a swedish news site.

 

[nCred]

Originally posted by: mcveigh
I edited my origianl post to include the source story from a swedish news site.

That´s not a swedish news site, it´s norwegian.

 

[OutHouse]

Originally posted by: Astaroth33

Originally posted by: MacBaine

Originally posted by: no0b
After reading the first 2 paragraphs I realized that it was biased as hell and stopped reading it.

Care to give us your take on it, provided your pro-animal sex stance?

One problem I have with the "article" (it's not an "article", but rather more of an op-ed) is that it automatically equates animal sex with abuse, talking about the "poor, defenseless" animals that are always being treated by veterinarians. Note the quote "Veterinarians project that when they come upon animals injured, every 20th dog or cat receiving treatment is because of the "the animal... inflicted... as a result of sexual assault."" This is VERY bad journalism- not only is there no source attributed to this quote, but whatever was said by whoever said if in fact anyone actually said it was deliberately mangled to fit the tone of the article.

Is sex with animals always abusive toward these "poor, defenseless" animals? If you have ever downloaded animal porn, you can note that in pretty much every single case, the animals are not only willing, but very enthusiastic participants.

you download animal porn? :disgust:

 

[Shanteli]

wow that is disturbing stuff

 

[Muzzan]

Originally posted by: nCred
yeah, right, I´m sure there´s a lot more animal abusers in Sweden then in other countries.

There´s about the same % of sick people in every county.
It IS illegal to have sex with animals in Sweden, it´s called cruelty against animal. All the other "facts" are probably fake too.

What a stupid and incorrect article.

http://www.svd.se/dynamiskt/inrikes/did_6790809.asp

 

[mcveigh]

Originally posted by: Muzzan

Originally posted by: nCred
yeah, right, I´m sure there´s a lot more animal abusers in Sweden then in other countries.

There´s about the same % of sick people in every county.
It IS illegal to have sex with animals in Sweden, it´s called cruelty against animal. All the other "facts" are probably fake too.

What a stupid and incorrect article.

http://www.svd.se/dynamiskt/inrikes/did_6790809.asp

what does that say?????????????

 

[Jeff7181]

Maybe moving there for a 10 mbit full duplex fiber optic connection isn't such a good idea... :Q

 

[Muzzan]

It says basically the same thing as the other articles (the one on Nettavisen is practically a verbatim translation of it).

 

[mcveigh]

Originally posted by: Jeff7181
Maybe moving there for a 10 mbit full duplex fiber optic connection isn't such a good idea... :Q

it's fine unless you have pets and an extra pervy neighbor

 

[WinkOsmosis]

Originally posted by: Jeff7181
Maybe moving there for a 10 mbit full duplex fiber optic connection isn't such a good idea... :Q

Why? Can't handle the competition?

 

[kt]

Originally posted by: Muzzan
It says basically the same thing as the other articles (the one on Nettavisen is practically a verbatim translation of it).

They added that cows and horses are sexually assaulted as well.

 

[emb09]

Originally posted by: Sid59
"It is estimated that from 200 to 300 animals are hurt anally because of sex with humans." - ewwww .. well it was annually but this is better

lol