Wallydraigle
Banned
- Nov 27, 2000
- 10,754
- 1
- 0
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
Originally posted by: Moralpanic
Are you that dumb? You really think 'incest' is a universal 'sin'? You are aware that even the european nobles practiced incest.
That's right. Because some people do it, it must be alright. Some people kill, so that must be ok too. I guess nothing's wrong according to your logic.
And according to your logic, cultures should not be permitted to have practices and traditions that disagree with yours?
Not at all. Man has free will, and thus can do as he pleases. Having the ability to do something does not justify so doing. Might does *not* make right. There is a distinction between having the ability to do something, and the concepts of right and wrong.
It's not about "might makes right", nor about absolutes in right and wrong. It's about cultural frames of reference, where incest is perfectly acceptable and encouraged. You and I disagree in that you believe in absolute right and wrong as defined by the Bible, and I do not. My belief system is summed up quite well in the quote in my sig.
If I had webbed feet, or ears all over my body, or some other freakish deformity, because my father was also my uncle, I would probably feel that his actions had harmed me, and bludgeon him with a fish. I suppose you could make the case that recreational incest without the intent to reproduce doesn't hurt anybody, until reproduction occurs and children are born with funky recessive genes. You could also make the case that leaving razor blades all around outside a playpen doens't hurt anybody either. I would consider irresponsible behavior that has a good chance of harming a child wrong, without waiting for someone actually being harmed to say so.