I've found myself wanting my Kahr CM9 back, and a desire to blow a few hundred bucks on something budget-minded.
I then defaulted to the gun owner/unwealthy semi-collector mindset (i.e. you like guns, but lack the financial means to just buy all kinds of extravagant silliness 'just because') and wanted to own something better than what I had before. Now I'm eyeing K9's really hard and trying to convince myself that it would be dumb to buy one because a) Kahrs, unlike most of what I own, are depreciating assets. Sitting on a shelf, they are not the practical equivalent of a stack of cash in the amount that I paid for them (or more). This is unfortunate but true. And b) my P239 DAK already fills this niche category of double-action single-stack non-polymer 9mm [sub]compact (little smaller than most compacts, but still 3 fingers on the grip). Heh...that sounds even more specific when I type it out. And the Sig is just a better gun that will always be worth about what I paid.
Anybody owned both the metal and polymer Kahrs? I've never shot the expensive ones, so I'm wondering if the trigger is much different from the CW/CM series. If I'm gonna through down K9 or MK9 money, I'm thinking it would be better spent on a good SA/DA doublestack companion to the small Sig. Or a .45 P220...wish they were cheaper.
/musings
And re: 22LR...meh. I guess I just see it as...guns are gonna be expensive. And I'd rather shoot cheap handguns and rifles than .22's of most any price. It really only gets me going if you suppress it...I wish .22 suppressors weren't so hard to find and/or expensive relative to the cost of ammo or the firearms. $300 or less on a Mosquito or similar, but with tax stamp, a minimum of about $500 to add a suppressor. More like 600-800, as cheap stuff like the Gemtech Outback is never in stock.