YAGT: OMG I love guns

Page 396 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

corwin

Diamond Member
Jan 13, 2006
8,644
9
81
I don't know that it will be any less finnicky than a conversion kit.

The gold standard is a purpose-built 22lr pistol like the Ruger Mark iii. Adapting a larger caliber centerfire pistol to run on 22lr is always a series of compromises.

Where's the compromise? A dedicated replacement slide is only using the same frame, everything else is purpose built for .22 caliber shooting. Now the cheap conversion for an AR to shoot .22 is a compromise, these not so much.
 

slugg

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
4,723
78
91
I don't know that it will be any less finnicky than a conversion kit.

The gold standard is a purpose-built 22lr pistol like the Ruger Mark iii. Adapting a larger caliber centerfire pistol to run on 22lr is always a series of compromises.

I'm not particularly enthused by the Ruger mk2/3. I shot the mk3 and I can definitely appreciate it's simplicity and accuracy, but it's really front heavy and I kept aiming low before I dialed it in. I don't think the front-heaviness made me aim low; I think it had something to do with the angle of the grip. My wrist did not feel natural to get a straight shot. Just FYI, I've had numerous injuries to both hands and they're just generally screwed up.

But that being said, if I can find one cheap enough and just go into it as if I'm buying a learning tool, rather than a gun I really like, then I may go for something like that. One major pro about that gun is that there's nothing to it mechanically. Seems like there's not much that can go wrong. I'm just speculating here; like I said, I'm a noob. My first time shooting was Saturday. I'm hooked.
 

TerryMathews

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
11,464
2
0
Where's the compromise? A dedicated replacement slide is only using the same frame, everything else is purpose built for .22 caliber shooting. Now the cheap conversion for an AR to shoot .22 is a compromise, these not so much.

You'll have to excuse me if I'm off base on this, as I dont own a Glock but based on pictures it appears the entire slide actuates during firing (just like a centerfire round)

Which is fine, except you're trying to move a hunk of metal which is proportionally gigantic compared to a purpose-built 22. The compromise is generally a weaker recoil spring which in turn causes the gun to FTF or FTRB more quickly as it becomes dirty.

Look at the amount of mass that cycles on a Mark iii/Buckmark vs a conversion kit. That is the engineering compromise.

You seem to be laboring under the impression that when I said compromise I meant cheap or junk; couldn't be further from the truth. There is value in converting your exact weapon to 22lr for training purposes. That doesn't negate the fact that it is a compromise.

Compromise isn't a negative word.
 

TerryMathews

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
11,464
2
0
I'm not particularly enthused by the Ruger mk2/3. I shot the mk3 and I can definitely appreciate it's simplicity and accuracy, but it's really front heavy and I kept aiming low before I dialed it in. I don't think the front-heaviness made me aim low; I think it had something to do with the angle of the grip. My wrist did not feel natural to get a straight shot. Just FYI, I've had numerous injuries to both hands and they're just generally screwed up.

But that being said, if I can find one cheap enough and just go into it as if I'm buying a learning tool, rather than a gun I really like, then I may go for something like that. One major pro about that gun is that there's nothing to it mechanically. Seems like there's not much that can go wrong. I'm just speculating here; like I said, I'm a noob. My first time shooting was Saturday. I'm hooked.

Simple isn't a word I'd use for a Mark iii. They are a PITA to detail strip. And TBH if you have hand issues it might be an impossibility for you to strip it without modifications - part of the process involves a vice and a rubber mallet...

If you didn't care for the Mark iii, how about the Smith & Wesson 22A? Keep in mind it comes in multiple lengths so you can find one that fits your particular need for balance.
 

corwin

Diamond Member
Jan 13, 2006
8,644
9
81
You'll have to excuse me if I'm off base on this, as I dont own a Glock but based on pictures it appears the entire slide actuates during firing (just like a centerfire round)

Which is fine, except you're trying to move a hunk of metal which is proportionally gigantic compared to a purpose-built 22. The compromise is generally a weaker recoil spring which in turn causes the gun to FTF or FTRB more quickly as it becomes dirty.

Look at the amount of mass that cycles on a Mark iii/Buckmark vs a conversion kit. That is the engineering compromise.

You seem to be laboring under the impression that when I said compromise I meant cheap or junk; couldn't be further from the truth. There is value in converting your exact weapon to 22lr for training purposes. That doesn't negate the fact that it is a compromise.

Compromise isn't a negative word.
You have a point, although the slide being used is purpose built for a .22 and as such is lighter, it's not at all the same slide being used for the full power cartridge, so there really isn't a compromise, even if it's not a negative word There are a ton of purpose built .22 pistols with slides that are just as reliable as a Buckmark/Mark III, and all of them pretty well equal what you would get from one of the conversions for the Glock, plus you get better ergonomics (IMHO) than the Buckmark/Mark III, I HATE that slanted grip angle
 

Merad

Platinum Member
May 31, 2010
2,586
19
81
Where's the compromise? A dedicated replacement slide is only using the same frame, everything else is purpose built for .22 caliber shooting. Now the cheap conversion for an AR to shoot .22 is a compromise, these not so much.

The .22 conversion is forced to use an action that it isn't really suited for.

Every single dedicated .22lr semi auto that I know of uses a blowback action. The barrel is fixed to the frame, and the bolt/slide is held closed purely by spring force. The round fires, and eventually the recoil force builds up enough to push the bolt back and cycle the action. All you need to do use tune the weight of the recoil spring to ensure that the bolt isn't opened early.

Most centerfire pistols including Glocks use a short recoil system. The barrel is is locked to the slide during firing, and the barrel and slide move together for a short distance, usually a few mm, to allow chamber pressure to drop to safe levels. Then some mechanism causes the barrel to unlock, the slide finishes cycling.

A conversion kit has to use the short recoil action - blowback would require permanent modification of the frame and somehow bolting the barrel into place every time you wanted to fire .22.... So now the weak .22 round is forced to move a lot more mass than normal (slide + barrel), plus it has to unlock the slide in the process.

Almost everyone I've talked to has said that their conversion kits don't work reliably without using hot .22 ammo such as mini-mags. It's a compromise.
 

TerryMathews

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
11,464
2
0
You have a point, although the slide being used is purpose built for a .22 and as such is lighter, it's not at all the same slide being used for the full power cartridge, so there really isn't a compromise, even if it's not a negative word There are a ton of purpose built .22 pistols with slides that are just as reliable as a Buckmark/Mark III, and all of them pretty well equal what you would get from one of the conversions for the Glock, plus you get better ergonomics (IMHO) than the Buckmark/Mark III, I HATE that slanted grip angle

Maybe try the Mark iii 22/45? It has the 1911 grip angle.
 

Kelvrick

Lifer
Feb 14, 2001
18,422
5
81
My advantage arms 1911 22 conversion has been pretty reliable. I ended up buying an RIA 45 1911 just to use the frame as a dedicated 22lr. I have the target model where only part of the slide blows back on firing, but the regular models are said to be just as reliable. They're also usually a lot lighter than the regular slides (made of lighter aluminum instead of heavier steel) and are usually tuned to work with much smaller recoil springs as well.

While we're on the topic of glocks, I just picked up my new glock 20 today from California jail. Now to wait for underwood ammo to get a few varieties back in stock before I make an order for 700+ ft lbs of happiness.
 

slugg

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
4,723
78
91
Simple isn't a word I'd use for a Mark iii. They are a PITA to detail strip. And TBH if you have hand issues it might be an impossibility for you to strip it without modifications - part of the process involves a vice and a rubber mallet...

If you didn't care for the Mark iii, how about the Smith & Wesson 22A? Keep in mind it comes in multiple lengths so you can find one that fits your particular need for balance.

The S&W 22a is definitely a cool looking gun! I'll make sure to rent it and see how I like it. One thing I don't like is the cheapo nylon bushing attached to the guide rod that needs to be replaced every X rounds. That just sounds like "woops" engineering to me.

I watched a video on disassembling a Ruger mk III... FORGET IT. That's out.

A Ruger SR22.

I was eyeing this. On paper, I really like this gun. I'll definitely have to rent one and check it out. It's actually at the top of my list, to be honest. The only thing I don't feel happy about is the plastic guide rod, but that's easily replaceable with a steel one, so if it ends up looking bad after a while, a cheap upgrade is available. I checked out a video for the disassembly and it's definitely easy. The only thing that would make me not like this gun would be putting it in my hand and simply not liking it.
 

TerryMathews

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
11,464
2
0
The S&W 22a is definitely a cool looking gun! I'll make sure to rent it and see how I like it. One thing I don't like is the cheapo nylon bushing attached to the guide rod that needs to be replaced every X rounds. That just sounds like "woops" engineering to me.

I watched a video on disassembling a Ruger mk III... FORGET IT. That's out.



I was eyeing this. On paper, I really like this gun. I'll definitely have to rent one and check it out. It's actually at the top of my list, to be honest. The only thing I don't feel happy about is the plastic guide rod, but that's easily replaceable with a steel one, so if it ends up looking bad after a while, a cheap upgrade is available. I checked out a video for the disassembly and it's definitely easy. The only thing that would make me not like this gun would be putting it in my hand and simply not liking it.

I've got a pair of mkiii 22/45s with the mag disconnect removal bushing. Really sweet shooters, but they are not for amateur shooters if you maintain your own gear.

I can vouch for the 22a. It was my first semi-auto 22lr and didn't really require any maintenance between a wipe down. And field stripping to the point where you can clean it is easy even with limited hand strength or mobility. Keep in mind though, there is basically no aftermarket for it. The way it comes is basically how it will always be, love it or hate it.

I did put a Hogue Handall on mine which made it more comfortable but I have big hands.
 

sa7an1

Member
Jun 3, 2010
97
0
0
So I got a Dan Wesson Valor-Bobtail (V-Bob) duty coat and I'm LOVING it! I picked up 3 Wilson 47 mags to go along with the 2 Checkmate mags it came with and have about 350-400 rounds through her. Thus far i can say I needed to get the rear sight adjusted as she was quite a bit left (need a smidge more after a trip to the gunsmith and range), other than that the trigger is VERY nice. little take up and a VERY clean crisp break. Only con i can come up with is the strapping is quite aggressive and after 3-4 mags it makes it self known.
 
Last edited:

pontifex

Lifer
Dec 5, 2000
43,804
46
91
The S&W 22a is definitely a cool looking gun! I'll make sure to rent it and see how I like it. One thing I don't like is the cheapo nylon bushing attached to the guide rod that needs to be replaced every X rounds. That just sounds like "woops" engineering to me.

I watched a video on disassembling a Ruger mk III... FORGET IT. That's out.



I was eyeing this. On paper, I really like this gun. I'll definitely have to rent one and check it out. It's actually at the top of my list, to be honest. The only thing I don't feel happy about is the plastic guide rod, but that's easily replaceable with a steel one, so if it ends up looking bad after a while, a cheap upgrade is available. I checked out a video for the disassembly and it's definitely easy. The only thing that would make me not like this gun would be putting it in my hand and simply not liking it.

Nothing wrong with a plastic guide rod. My cz p-01 has one and its fine. Its not a stress point or critical to function, it just helps keep the recoil spring in alignment. 1911s operate fine without a full length guide rod.
 
Last edited:

Tiamat

Lifer
Nov 25, 2003
14,068
5
71
So I got a Dan Wesson Valor-Bobtail (V-Bob) duty coat and I'm LOVING it! I picked up 3 Wilson 47 mags to go along with the 2 Checkmate mags it came with and have about 350-400 rounds through her. Thus far i can say I needed to get the rear sight adjusted as she was quite a bit left (need a smidge more after a trip to the gunsmith and range), other than that the trigger is VERY nice. little take up and a VERY clean crisp break. Only con i can come up with is the strapping is quite aggressive and after 3-4 mags it makes it self known.

I'm jealous! Post pics please :-D
 

phucheneh

Diamond Member
Jun 30, 2012
7,306
5
0
What's the point of a .22 anymore? I mean, if you can still buy big bulk boxes of .22 for beans, then I guess I can see it; but .22 still seems to be the most universally hard to find, highly overvalued ammo. Might as well just shoot 9mm. Or a gas-operated airsoft gun...that's honestly what .22 pistols remind me of.

Granted, that's a bit colored by a) stupid ammo prices and b) that handguns with a box mag and a slide seem to jam on cheap .22. Generally, I just wouldn't ever own any mag-fed rimfire. Or rimmed centerfire, for that matter...it just doesn't work well. Save it for the wheelguns or tube-fed rifles.

Speaking of which, does anyone know if there are any lever action rifles out there for reasonable money? Replicas from the typical Italian suspects are way more pricey than their revolvers...just can't see dropping a grand on an Uberti 1873 repeater.
 

TerryMathews

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
11,464
2
0
What's the point of a .22 anymore? I mean, if you can still buy big bulk boxes of .22 for beans, then I guess I can see it; but .22 still seems to be the most universally hard to find, highly overvalued ammo. Might as well just shoot 9mm. Or a gas-operated airsoft gun...that's honestly what .22 pistols remind me of.

Granted, that's a bit colored by a) stupid ammo prices and b) that handguns with a box mag and a slide seem to jam on cheap .22. Generally, I just wouldn't ever own any mag-fed rimfire. Or rimmed centerfire, for that matter...it just doesn't work well. Save it for the wheelguns or tube-fed rifles.

Speaking of which, does anyone know if there are any lever action rifles out there for reasonable money? Replicas from the typical Italian suspects are way more pricey than their revolvers...just can't see dropping a grand on an Uberti 1873 repeater.

Henry
 

phucheneh

Diamond Member
Jun 30, 2012
7,306
5
0
Clarification: not .22.

Okay, well, I might go for a .22, but it'd have to be dirt-ass cheap, and I don't think that's out there. I had no idea Henry was a company that was still in business, TBQH, but checking their prices, it's basically around the $500 mark for a .22 and closer to a grand for .357 or similar.
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
What's the point of a .22 anymore? I mean, if you can still buy big bulk boxes of .22 for beans, then I guess I can see it; but .22 still seems to be the most universally hard to find, highly overvalued ammo. Might as well just shoot 9mm. Or a gas-operated airsoft gun...that's honestly what .22 pistols remind me of.
There's lots of reasons to shoot .22LR:

1) Even at inflated prices, it's still not as expensive as centerfire rifle or pistol ammunition. Inflated in my area is $40-$50 per 500 round bulk pack. Keep in mind, if you're active on the local gun forums, you can get alerts when local stores have bulk packs in for $25-$30 (still inflated, but much better than scalpers prices). Walmart is selling their least expensive brass 9mm for 25 cents/round and their least expensive brass .223/5.56 for 40 cents/round.

2) Low recoil, low noise, makes it easier for beginners and children. Not everyone is Jerry Miculek, running V-drills in 2 seconds with a 50BMG.

3) The firearms are cheaper as well; an M&P 15-22 is $360 online, and an M&P15 Sport is at least $200 more. My SIG 522 is half the price of a SIG 556.
 

phucheneh

Diamond Member
Jun 30, 2012
7,306
5
0
I've found myself wanting my Kahr CM9 back, and a desire to blow a few hundred bucks on something budget-minded.

I then defaulted to the gun owner/unwealthy semi-collector mindset (i.e. you like guns, but lack the financial means to just buy all kinds of extravagant silliness 'just because') and wanted to own something better than what I had before. Now I'm eyeing K9's really hard and trying to convince myself that it would be dumb to buy one because a) Kahrs, unlike most of what I own, are depreciating assets. Sitting on a shelf, they are not the practical equivalent of a stack of cash in the amount that I paid for them (or more). This is unfortunate but true. And b) my P239 DAK already fills this niche category of double-action single-stack non-polymer 9mm [sub]compact (little smaller than most compacts, but still 3 fingers on the grip). Heh...that sounds even more specific when I type it out. And the Sig is just a better gun that will always be worth about what I paid.

Anybody owned both the metal and polymer Kahrs? I've never shot the expensive ones, so I'm wondering if the trigger is much different from the CW/CM series. If I'm gonna through down K9 or MK9 money, I'm thinking it would be better spent on a good SA/DA doublestack companion to the small Sig. Or a .45 P220...wish they were cheaper.

/musings

And re: 22LR...meh. I guess I just see it as...guns are gonna be expensive. And I'd rather shoot cheap handguns and rifles than .22's of most any price. It really only gets me going if you suppress it...I wish .22 suppressors weren't so hard to find and/or expensive relative to the cost of ammo or the firearms. $300 or less on a Mosquito or similar, but with tax stamp, a minimum of about $500 to add a suppressor. More like 600-800, as cheap stuff like the Gemtech Outback is never in stock.
 

TerryMathews

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
11,464
2
0
I've found myself wanting my Kahr CM9 back, and a desire to blow a few hundred bucks on something budget-minded.

I then defaulted to the gun owner/unwealthy semi-collector mindset (i.e. you like guns, but lack the financial means to just buy all kinds of extravagant silliness 'just because') and wanted to own something better than what I had before. Now I'm eyeing K9's really hard and trying to convince myself that it would be dumb to buy one because a) Kahrs, unlike most of what I own, are depreciating assets. Sitting on a shelf, they are not the practical equivalent of a stack of cash in the amount that I paid for them (or more). This is unfortunate but true. And b) my P239 DAK already fills this niche category of double-action single-stack non-polymer 9mm [sub]compact (little smaller than most compacts, but still 3 fingers on the grip). Heh...that sounds even more specific when I type it out. And the Sig is just a better gun that will always be worth about what I paid.

Anybody owned both the metal and polymer Kahrs? I've never shot the expensive ones, so I'm wondering if the trigger is much different from the CW/CM series. If I'm gonna through down K9 or MK9 money, I'm thinking it would be better spent on a good SA/DA doublestack companion to the small Sig. Or a .45 P220...wish they were cheaper.

/musings

And re: 22LR...meh. I guess I just see it as...guns are gonna be expensive. And I'd rather shoot cheap handguns and rifles than .22's of most any price. It really only gets me going if you suppress it...I wish .22 suppressors weren't so hard to find and/or expensive relative to the cost of ammo or the firearms. $300 or less on a Mosquito or similar, but with tax stamp, a minimum of about $500 to add a suppressor. More like 600-800, as cheap stuff like the Gemtech Outback is never in stock.

You can silence a 22 cheaply and easily: Aguila Colibri.
 

veri745

Golden Member
Oct 11, 2007
1,163
4
81
Noob here. What's the most Glock-like 22lr pistol out there? One that doesn't suck (i. e. not ISSC).

Get an M&P 22 like I did just a few weeks ago.

Same frame and size as the M&P 9mm and .40, but with a fixed barrel and aluminum slide.

The M&P series if very similar to Glocks in a lot of ways
 

adairusmc

Diamond Member
Jul 24, 2006
7,095
78
91
I replaced the slick wood grips on my 625JM with a set of VZ tactical diamond N-Frame grips in Predator green this week, and picked up some more moon clips.

I hated the slick wood grips after shooting it last weekend, so I found the VZ's on amazon. They are amazing, and I now want to get sets of them the rest of my S&W revolvers.

 

pontifex

Lifer
Dec 5, 2000
43,804
46
91
You can silence a 22 cheaply and easily: Aguila Colibri.

but you're sacrificing a lot of range and power. they aren't really good past 50 yards and even then they drop several inches - and thats out of a rifle (which the box says not to use them in).

they are damn quiet though.
 

pontifex

Lifer
Dec 5, 2000
43,804
46
91
I replaced the slick wood grips on my 625JM with a set of VZ tactical diamond N-Frame grips in Predator green this week, and picked up some more moon clips.

I hated the slick wood grips after shooting it last weekend, so I found the VZ's on amazon. They are amazing, and I now want to get sets of them the rest of my S&W revolvers.


would love me a .45 acp revolver!
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |