IGemini
Platinum Member
- Nov 5, 2010
- 2,472
- 2
- 81
I dont know what SL means. I guess its German for "single stack".
All P230/232s are single stack but not all are "SL." It indicates the stainless steel model.
They won't, for the same reason that the FBI dropped it. It's too much for joe average to handle.
.40 is probably out. Part of the reason they're dropping the M9 is because they say maintenance costs are becoming an issue. Most .40s that I know of are based on 9mm designs. I doubt they'll hold up to long term use and abuse well enough. Unless some ambitious company decides to design a new .40 from scratch...
I really can't see the army adopting another single stack .45 design. The P227 and FNX-45 will probably be strong contenders though. But I wouldn't be surprised if they just go with another 9mm.
I was going to say the exact same thing about the 10mm. But I think there's equal chance the Army will go with .40S&W or readopt .45ACP. Modern pistols are usually designed around the .40 first, the USP for example (which I'd also put as a good contender for the MHS).
I'm not convinced that a manual safety will be a necessity either. During the M9 trials the P226 passed all the tests, SIG just wanted more money for what they were offering so Beretta won the contract.