The point I'm making here is that the percentage of gun violence precipitated by people who lawfully own guns and lawfully carry them is exceedingly low. Most people who lawfully carry are not likely to shoot you because you didn't signal; many of these people (spidey not included) are overly conscious of carrying a gun and are thus less likely to cause an incident. Of all the people I know personally who carry, most are very responsible. One is a little over zealous (but won't pull a gun or anything...he just really likes his guns) and lastly, one who is a complete moron and should never carry a gun ever again in his entire life.
I so did not want to reply to any of the random gun politics crap some of you guys were talking about, but I feel that it is worth pointing something out...
Where exactly do you think the guns used in crimes come from? Do you think people are buying guns overseas and smuggling them across the border or something?
I would be willing to bet 99% of guns used in crimes had a lawful owner at some previous point in time.
'But that's silly!' people will say. 'You can't condemn people for having things stolen from them!'
Right, this is true. But you surely also cannot say that just because those who buy firearms legally (especially through a dealer and with a background check) rarely commit crimes with them, that said purchases play
no part in criminal activity. I'd say one would have to be EXCEEDINGLY illogical to claim that fewer firearms, legal or not, would not equal less gun crime.
At this point, it's hard to say gun laws would do ANYTHING to help this...it's closing the barn door after the horse got out, raised a horse family, died, and then was beaten by pro-gun/anti-gun debaters. But, again...you simply can't say that legal gun sales are a totally separate entity from gun crime. It makes you look just as bad as the blindly anti-gun crowd.