Originally posted by: TheShiz
"I can understand how blind faith has caused many problems in the past, the Crusades, Inquisition, etc. Much of that, however, was more the political ambitions of the Catholic Church (which I am not) than having to do with Christianity. Jesus would hardly have supported such a thing. Heck, Hitler used religious propaganda to rally the masses in Germany, but I don't think anyone would sanely argue that Hitler was Christian."
yet by your own argument if Hitler accepted jesus he should be in heaven right now, correct? That would make him christian, correct?
"There's nothing egotistical about it! Scientists believe in black holes. They have never seen one, they can only observe its effects. Are they egotistical for believing in somehting that cannot be verified? "
the difference is that when scientists debate black holes they are not asserting that "they have the truth" or whatever it is that you claim to have. They base judgements on scienfitic fact, and if they cannot, their positions do not fly. All of your claims have absolutely no factual basis whatsoever. I guess you like that kind of reasoning, to each his own.
Edit: also, you should think before overusing your analogies, they are pretty bad.
1.) Yes, you are correct about Hitler, but you are leaving the point was making and going into something different. That makes no sense.
2.) I have already said, no one can "prove" faith. As for facts backing up scripture, there are countless archaeological discoveries that have verified the places found in the Bible.
3.) So, you're telling me there are no scientists that claim black holes are not theory but are fact? I beg to differ.
As for you taking pot shots at me, I couldn't care less. I have come to expect such drivel from people like you - those who simply disagree with Christianity, but have some sort of extreem dislike them it. I am not overusing any analogy. They are all logical and concise. I am sorry if they are above your head and you cannot understand them.