What part of "
we just don't have enough information..." don't you understand.
As it is we just don't have enough information yet!
Here in Las Vegas we are outfitting our patrol officers with
on-person video cams so the mostly good get cleared fast and the very few bad cops get culled out or straighten out. I suspect as you said: it is probable that the policeman did anything wrong but we won't know before the incident is resolved.
My post just used the posts above to lead into a solution that benefits the many fine policeman.
The problem as I see it; some (
maybe most) are quick to judge without the facts and their opinion depends on which way they think the wind is blowing. The police here are tired of some bozo cop some place far removed doing something egregiously wrong and riots breaking out and the brush that paints that situation splatters all over well-trained cops who don't deserve the bum rap. Having a way to review and clear when some zealot decides to paint an incident with without enough facts to draw a conclusion; there must be a way conclusively make that problem go away. Apopka, FL probably has such a problem.
Some of us know what the wind blows from an outhouse; don't put me downwind just because all I read was the initial story and while I tried to listen to recorded video I didn't catch they were in a parking lot. That fact is inconsequential whether the officers acted inappropriately; except perhaps in the above thread. How the police acted and then reacted is what this should be about.
The only conclusion (
I can't draw yet) is that this 'Jay Syrmopoulos' is probably a civil rights zealot who may not let the facts get in the way of making yet another post on his 'whatever' blog or twitter account. Sounds like Outhouse is guilty of forming an opinion when there are just not enough facts to draw a conclusion. Strange company you keep.