Yet another bad cop, this time a lady cop.

sm625

Diamond Member
May 6, 2011
8,172
137
106
They should arrest that youtube poster immediately. It should be a crime to distribute videos of police!
 

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,819
1,126
126
If it weren't for the You Tube video, I doubt this would have ever seen the light of day.
 

mxnerd

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2007
6,799
1,101
126
Bad cops are cops who are dumb.

Nowadays police has way too much power.

Democratic America is fast becoming Communist China in the past.
 

fleshconsumed

Diamond Member
Feb 21, 2002
6,485
2,362
136
Sigh. The video cuts out too soon so they're going to claim innocence and nothing is going to happen.
 

bradley

Diamond Member
Jan 9, 2000
3,671
2
81
If the police can stereotype us, we can stereotype them. I treat leos just as I would an unreasonably wild animal looking for trouble and make absolutely no contact.

And you should also try to be absolutely upstanding in their presence without any instances of even minor or petty infractions. Here's what could happen if you jaywalk for example....

RAW: Police beat, detain teenager for jaywalking
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ls-868BO1dc
 

mrjminer

Platinum Member
Dec 2, 2005
2,739
16
76
If the police can stereotype us, we can stereotype them. I treat leos just as I would an unreasonably wild animal looking for trouble and make absolutely no contact.

And you should also try to be absolutely upstanding in their presence without any instances of even minor or petty infractions. Here's what could happen if you jaywalk for example....

RAW: Police beat, detain teenager for jaywalking
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ls-868BO1dc

So... your argument is a link to a video you call label as "RAW: Police beat, detain teenager for jaywalking," which contains no beating, no jaywalking (other than some random person yelling that he was just jaywalking and "just a kid" the entire video), and actually only chronicles the police trying to arrest someone who is resisting arrest while being told to stop resisting arrest -- who is subsequently arrested while resisting arrest? Gee, your argument is so convincing. I had my doubts, but you, sir, have made me a believer.

Anyways, the OP video starts too late and ends too soon to know everything, without this information, it looks like the officers were overstepping, though.
 
Last edited:

retrospooty

Platinum Member
Apr 3, 2002
2,031
74
86
There are alot of really good cops out there... The vast majority for sure, but we do need to do something about the "bad eggs". This crap has gone on forever, and is only coming to light more now since we all have smartphones that can take video. Keep doing it and keep making the bad cops pay for their crimes. Too many cops have lost sight of the "protect and serve" motto and just go out every day and bully and intimidate people. They see the public they are sworn to protect as the enemy and that shit has to be rooted out and stopped. Sadly, without video there is little way to prove it. All the more reasons cops should have cameras on them... it protects them when they are in the right and force is the correct choice.
 

HumblePie

Lifer
Oct 30, 2000
14,667
440
126
This is a tough one.

First off, the guys thought they weren't doing anything wrong, but they were on private property outside a closed business. As far as they know the owners of the property called the police to report suspicious activity of people outside their business after hours at night or it could have been an automatic thing.

I get that the guys thought they were breaking no laws and were infact being harmless enough, but they were being aggressive back to the officer conducting her investigation.

The female officer was trying to ascertain what had happened and occurred and had called her supervisor as backup. I have zero problems with the actions of the female officer in the video. She didn't rough anyone up, and those two darker skinned individuals at night look "black" in a dark area. It is a legitimate Terry stop and they were acting like self righteous ass hats for the camera. More the second guy not holding the camera was a bit more confrontational.

Had the two guys stated something like, "Sorry we were waiting here for a ride and didn't realize it was private property is it OK if we move somewhere else to wait for our ride?" then I doubted the whole ordeal would have ever had happened. Instead they thought they were right and not on private property and thus not breaking any crimes.

I have a tough time sympathizing here with the individuals in this video compared to others I've seen recently. However, this is why I state this is tough, the actions of those police officers were very unprofessional even if technically not illegal from what I saw. While they had the right to do what they did, that doesn't mean they should have. It was clear that the officers that arrived later after the female let their emotions dictate their actions. But the OP is wrong. The female cop here didn't do anything at all either unprofessional or illegal. Needs to fix the title.
 
Last edited:

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,095
513
126
This is a tough one.

First off, the guys thought they weren't doing anything wrong, but they were on private property outside a closed business. As far as they know the owners of the property called the police to report suspicious activity of people outside their business after hours at night or it could have been an automatic thing.

I get that the guys thought they were breaking no laws and were infact being harmless enough, but they were being aggressive back to the officer conducting her investigation.

The female officer was trying to ascertain what had happened and occurred and had called her supervisor as backup. I have zero problems with the actions of the female officer in the video. She didn't rough anyone up, and those two darker skinned individuals at night look "black" in a dark area. It is a legitimate Terry stop and they were acting like self righteous ass hats for the camera. More the second guy not holding the camera was a bit more confrontational.

Had the two guys stated something like, "Sorry we were waiting here for a ride and didn't realize it was private property is it OK if we move somewhere else to wait for our ride?" then I doubted the whole ordeal would have ever had happened. Instead they thought they were right and not on private property and thus not breaking any crimes.

I have a tough time sympathizing here with the individuals in this video compared to others I've seen recently. However, this is why I state this is tough, the actions of those police officers were very unprofessional even if technically not illegal from what I saw. While they had the right to do what they did, that doesn't mean they should have. It was clear that the officers that arrived later after the female let their emotions dictate their actions. But the OP is wrong. The female cop here didn't do anything at all either unprofessional or illegal. Needs to fix the title.

The cops never said the property owners called in these guys for trespassing. The cops answer to why they were being harassed is they were trespassing. What? Trespassing isnt a default criminal act for walking on private property. The cops were out of line. And unsurprisingly when backup arrived they got violent.
 

Theb

Diamond Member
Feb 28, 2006
3,533
9
76
Finding out why some guys are near a closed business in the dark is a good idea. She should have found out why they were there and moved on though.

It's unfortunate that some cops don't seem to have a conversational tone once they put the uniform on. Barking at people is an important part of the job, but it's good to have more than one tool in your toolbox.
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,413
616
126
The cops never said the property owners called in these guys for trespassing. The cops answer to why they were being harassed is they were trespassing. What? Trespassing isnt a default criminal act for walking on private property. The cops were out of line. And unsurprisingly when backup arrived they got violent.


cop said there was a sign.... nobody here knows if there is one or not so passing judgement saying the cop was wrong and calling them pigs is a bit excessive and immature.

The definition of trespassing is entering or remaining on someone′s property without permission. You′ve probably seen these signs like “Private Property”, “Do Not Enter” and “No Trespassing” on vacant lots, wooded areas, abandoned houses or near factories. If there′s a sign posted (whether you see it or not), or if you′ve been told by the owner not to be on the property, this is considered adequate notice. Disregarding these rules can result in a charge of trespass, which is a misdemeanor.
 

K7SN

Senior member
Jun 21, 2015
353
0
0
The trespassing, if any, may be the result of a cop either pushing or moving them off of public property which is not trespassing!

The catch 22 example is not going to fly! Sitting on a curb is on public property whether their posteriors in on a public sidewalk or not. The problem is we don't have a video from the beginning so we don't know for sure unless one of the initial officers confirms they were on the curb. This is from the first link:

"The two men said they were simply sitting on a curb outside of a cellphone store after business hours, waiting for a ride, when approached by the overly aggressive officer. Now one of the men has spoken out, claiming that he feels he was racially profiled. "

All policemen on patrol should be required to wear a video camera and we would less of the bullying. As it is we just don't have enough information yet! The officers are under investigation and perhaps the ranking officer also needs to be held accountable.
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,413
616
126
The trespassing, if any, may be the result of a cop either pushing or moving them off of public property which is not trespassing!

so in other words you dont know the whole story and are just making shit up to support your narrative that the cops thugs.
 

HumblePie

Lifer
Oct 30, 2000
14,667
440
126
The trespassing, if any, may be the result of a cop either pushing or moving them off of public property which is not trespassing!

The catch 22 example is not going to fly! Sitting on a curb is on public property whether their posteriors in on a public sidewalk or not. The problem is we don't have a video from the beginning so we don't know for sure unless one of the initial officers confirms they were on the curb. This is from the first link:

"The two men said they were simply sitting on a curb outside of a cellphone store after business hours, waiting for a ride, when approached by the overly aggressive officer. Now one of the men has spoken out, claiming that he feels he was racially profiled. "

All policemen on patrol should be required to wear a video camera and we would less of the bullying. As it is we just don't have enough information yet! The officers are under investigation and perhaps the ranking officer also needs to be held accountable.

They were sitting on the curb of a parking lot, not the street. That curb and sidewalk and parking lot were not public property as stated by the officer and can be seen in the video of where they are sitting.

Again legal stop for the cops to determine if trespassing is going on. Original officer is doing her duty and investigating what is going on. Guys should have just said, "Sorry. didn't realize this might have been private propert while waiting for a ride. Do you mind if we move somewhere else then to wait for our ride?" and that would have been the end of the scenario I believe. Instead they turn on their camera and back talk to the officer like they know the law and her job better than her. She did the right thing and called in her supervisor to handle the scenario. I have ZERO problems with how the original officer handled the situation. She did not manhandle anyone nor be overtly rude.

I do have a bit of a problem with how the later arriving cops handled the situation. Still it is legal and most later arriving cops coming to a scene as backup TEND to think the scene is much worse than it is. Why? Better to be prepared for something worse happening than not tends to be the mindset of many officers these days. Whether that is a good thing or not is personal opinion. Even the actions of the arriving officers were not illegal. They issued commands and used force to apply those commands when not immediately reacted by the individuals. Not something I think is right nor really proper, but technically legal.


This is really a bad overall scenario in trying to show cops being jack booted thugs. There was zero initial compliance by the suspects with the original female officer. They were straight up telling her why they think it was legal for them to be there. Don't do that with an officer. Ever. Not when said officer is just trying to talk to you as the original female officer was doing. That is being an asshat for the camera. They reacted wrong to the initial Terry stop and it escalated because of it.
 

HumblePie

Lifer
Oct 30, 2000
14,667
440
126
Finding out why some guys are near a closed business in the dark is a good idea. She should have found out why they were there and moved on though.

It's unfortunate that some cops don't seem to have a conversational tone once they put the uniform on. Barking at people is an important part of the job, but it's good to have more than one tool in your toolbox.

She was barking at them? what video were you watching? She was trying to explain the law and why she was there and the guy not holding the camera kept yelling at her they weren't doing any crime. The guy holding the camera was trying to sound "reasonable" but they shouldn't even be trying to defend themselves in that way. The original two guys should have said they didn't realize where they were was private property, apologized, and then asked to leave. There would more than likely have been no escalation of the scenario had that occurred.
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,947
126
so in other words you dont know the whole story and are just making shit up to support your narrative that the cops thugs.


Kinda like how you make up stuff in every thread you post in? Like isis supporters waving isis flags are refugees?
 

K7SN

Senior member
Jun 21, 2015
353
0
0
What part of "we just don't have enough information..." don't you understand.

As it is we just don't have enough information yet!

Here in Las Vegas we are outfitting our patrol officers with on-person video cams so the mostly good get cleared fast and the very few bad cops get culled out or straighten out. I suspect as you said: it is probable that the policeman did anything wrong but we won't know before the incident is resolved.

My post just used the posts above to lead into a solution that benefits the many fine policeman.

The problem as I see it; some (maybe most) are quick to judge without the facts and their opinion depends on which way they think the wind is blowing. The police here are tired of some bozo cop some place far removed doing something egregiously wrong and riots breaking out and the brush that paints that situation splatters all over well-trained cops who don't deserve the bum rap. Having a way to review and clear when some zealot decides to paint an incident with without enough facts to draw a conclusion; there must be a way conclusively make that problem go away. Apopka, FL probably has such a problem.

Some of us know what the wind blows from an outhouse; don't put me downwind just because all I read was the initial story and while I tried to listen to recorded video I didn't catch they were in a parking lot. That fact is inconsequential whether the officers acted inappropriately; except perhaps in the above thread. How the police acted and then reacted is what this should be about.

The only conclusion (I can't draw yet) is that this 'Jay Syrmopoulos' is probably a civil rights zealot who may not let the facts get in the way of making yet another post on his 'whatever' blog or twitter account. Sounds like Outhouse is guilty of forming an opinion when there are just not enough facts to draw a conclusion. Strange company you keep.
 

EOM

Senior member
Mar 20, 2015
479
14
81
A large problem with cops these days, and i believe it stems from training at the academy: EGO.
 

Bart*Simpson

Senior member
Jul 21, 2015
604
4
36
www.canadaka.net
They were sitting on the curb of a parking lot, not the street. That curb and sidewalk and parking lot were not public property as stated by the officer and can be seen in the video of where they are sitting.

Unless business hours for the lot are posted then it's private property but open to the public and unless the police observe a crime going on then they have no justifiable cause for a Terry stop. Sitting on a curb in plain sight is not going to stand up as justifiable cause under Terry.

The guys who were beat up will shortly become wealthier.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |