You can't have my guns.

Page 10 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Geosurface

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2012
5,776
4
0
There is zero reason for anyone to own something whose sole purpose is to bring about the death of others. ZERO.

Only if "others" means other creatures.

Guns have lots of purposes other than "bring about the death of others."

- Hunting
- Defending your home and your life
- Collectors
- Preventing death, in the hands of police or citizens, both as a direct means (shooting someone about to kill 5 people) or as a deterrent (I don't think I'll break into this house, they might have a gun)
 

pontifex

Lifer
Dec 5, 2000
43,806
46
91
Gangs which use guns. They aren't going around beating 10,000 people to death a year with their bare hands.

This is a bigger problem than mentally ill people with guns. It is a problem with ANYONE having a gun. Because a gun turns ANYONE into a weapon of mass destruction.

There is zero reason for anyone to own something whose sole purpose is to bring about the death of others. ZERO.

what happened to you to be so afraid of guns and think that anyone with a gun wants to become a mass murderer? I'm being serious. where did this thought come from?
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Only if "others" means other creatures.

Guns have lots of purposes other than "bring about the death of others."

- Hunting
- Defending your home and your life
- Collectors
- Preventing death, in the hands of police or citizens, both as a direct means (shooting someone about to kill 5 people) or as a deterrent (I don't think I'll break into this house, they might have a gun)
Add to that a huge recreational shooting and sport shooting market.
 

tokie

Golden Member
Jun 1, 2006
1,491
0
0
what happened to you to be so afraid of guns and think that anyone with a gun wants to become a mass murderer? I'm being serious. where did this thought come from?

Gun owners are typically nutjobs. They act like we live in 1800 where "we have to protect ourselves from the big bad wolf outside".

It is 2012. We have incredibly advanced science and technology today. We have sent people to the moon. We have people floating in space 350km above our heads.

Yet for some reason there are nutjobs out there who insist on some kind of animalistic world where if someone steals a loaf of bread from you then you have a right to kill them. They think the solution to too many guns is to give even more guns to those who don't have one.

At the end of the day, humans are social creatures and we can only prosper as a community. Guns only exist to take away lives (of creatures, humans, etc) and destroy those communities.

Yes you can "practice" with them, but what are you practicing for? The zombie apocalypse?
 

x-alki

Golden Member
Jun 2, 2007
1,353
1
81
Gun owners are typically nutjobs. They act like we live in 1800 where "we have to protect ourselves from the big bad wolf outside".

It is 2012. We have incredibly advanced science and technology today. We have sent people to the moon. We have people floating in space 350km above our heads.

Yet for some reason there are nutjobs out there who insist on some kind of animalistic world where if someone steals a loaf of bread from you then you have a right to kill them. They think the solution to too many guns is to give even more guns to those who don't have one.

At the end of the day, humans are social creatures and we can only prosper as a community. Guns only exist to take away lives (of creatures, humans, etc) and destroy those communities.

Yes you can "practice" with them, but what are you practicing for? The zombie apocalypse?
I almost feel sorry for you, almost.

You call gun owners 'nutjobs' and I call you a troll.
 

Farmer

Diamond Member
Dec 23, 2003
3,345
2
81
Yes you can "practice" with them, but what are you practicing for? The zombie apocalypse?

Seriously, why do people practice the piano? Or soup up their car? Or collect Magic cards?

It's called doing something because you want to do it. Just because you only see guns as instruments of death doesn't mean everyone in the country should agree with you.

Welcome to the free world?
 

velillen

Platinum Member
Jul 12, 2006
2,120
1
81
So for all you calling for an out right ban I just have a question or two.

1) what sort of reimbursement you going to give gun owners? My gun might cost 700 bucks but what if I have 500 in accessories and upgrades? Better reimburse every penny.

2) what about ammo and gun related accessories like mag loader, reloading equipment, and other items used solely for use for guns? Better be willing to reimburse all that as well. Same with extra parts like a spare bolt.

And better be tax free since I wouldnt want to pay taxes on crap I'm being forced to give up. (And already paid taxes to buy)

And what about private sales? Good luck tracking all them down when a bill of sale and notification are not required.

But whatever I had a tragic boating accident and lost everything. Sad day who would have thought 2000 plus pounds of gun items would be to much for my tiny dingy.


Guess I'd just have to pay the price of others. My government security clearance, back ground checks from buying guns, and the two batfe background checks (for suppressor) aren't enough.
 

blankslate

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2008
8,659
491
126
Homicide rate per 100,000 people:
Honduras 91.6
El Salvador 69.2
Côte d'Ivoire 56.9
Jamaica 52.2
Venezuela 45.1
Belize 41.4
U.S. Virgin Islands 39.2
Guatemala 38.5
Saint Kitts and Nevis 38.2
Zambia 38.0
Uganda 36.3
Malawi 36.0
Lesotho 35.2
Trinidad and Tobago 35.2
Colombia 33.4
South Africa 31.8
Congo 30.8
Central African Republic 29.3
Bahamas 27.4
Puerto Rico 26.2
Saint Lucia 25.2
Dominican Republic 25.0
Tanzania 24.5
Sudan 24.2
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 22.9
Ethiopia 22.5
Guinea 22.5
Dominica 22.1
Burundi 21.7
Democratic Republic of the Congo 21.7
Panama 21.6
Brazil 21.0
Equatorial Guinea 20.7
Guinea-Bissau 20.2
Kenya 20.1
Kyrgyzstan 20.1
Cameroon 19.7
Montserrat 19.7
Greenland 19.2
Angola 19.0
Guyana 18.6
Burkina Faso 18.0
Eritrea 17.8
Namibia 17.2
Rwanda 17.1
Mexico 16.9
Chad 15.8
Ghana 15.7
Ecuador 15.2
North Korea 15.2
Benin 15.1
Sierra Leone 14.9
Mauritania 14.7
Botswana 14.5
Zimbabwe 14.3
Gabon 13.8
Nicaragua 13.6
French Guiana 13.3
Papua New Guinea 13.0
Swaziland 12.9
Bermuda 12.3
Comoros 12.2
Nigeria 12.2
Cape Verde 11.6
Grenada 11.5
Paraguay 11.5
Barbados 11.3
Togo 10.9
Gambia 10.8
Peru 10.3
Myanmar 10.2
Russia 10.2
Liberia 10.1
Costa Rica 10.0
Nauru 9.8
Bolivia 8.9
Mozambique 8.8
Kazakhstan 8.8
Senegal 8.7
Turks and Caicos Islands 8.7
Mongolia 8.7
British Virgin Islands 8.6
Cayman Islands 8.4
Seychelles 8.3
Madagascar 8.1
Indonesia 8.1
Mali 8.0
Pakistan 7.8
Moldova 7.5
Kiribati 7.3
Guadeloupe 7.0
Haiti 6.9
Timor-Leste 6.9
Anguilla 6.8
Antigua and Barbuda 6.8
Lithuania 6.6
Uruguay 5.9
Philippines 5.4
Ukraine 5.2
Estonia 5.2
Cuba 5.0
Belarus 4.9
Thailand 4.8
Suriname 4.6
Laos 4.6
Georgia 4.3
Martinique 4.2
United States 4.2

Nice list.

From looking at a couple of numbers it seems to use data from a list found on the following wiki page.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate

oddly enough your list (or one you quoted without checking up the sources for) somehow missed these countries that are also on the list cited on the wikipedia page but somehow missing from the one in your post.

Egypt-----------1.2
Tunisia----------1.1
Japan-----------0.2
South Korea-----2.6
Switzerland------0.7
Australia--------1.0
Israel-----------2.1
Sweden---------1.0




France-----------1.1
Netherlands------1.1
New Zealand-----0.9
Spain------------0.8
United Kingdom---1.2
Turkey-----------3.3
Germany---------0.8
Canada----------1.6
Norway----------0.6
Iceland----------0.3
Hungary---------1.3
Denmark---------0.9

The list you quoted left out countries that show that the U.S. is by far from the country with the least amount of homicides per 100k people.

The second set of countries are member nations of NATO which suggests that they also share at least some cultural commonalities or common Governmental ideaology.
 
Last edited:

Sixguns

Platinum Member
May 22, 2011
2,258
2
81
Gun owners are typically nutjobs. They act like we live in 1800 where "we have to protect ourselves from the big bad wolf outside".

It is 2012. We have incredibly advanced science and technology today. We have sent people to the moon. We have people floating in space 350km above our heads.

Yet for some reason there are nutjobs out there who insist on some kind of animalistic world where if someone steals a loaf of bread from you then you have a right to kill them. They think the solution to too many guns is to give even more guns to those who don't have one.

At the end of the day, humans are social creatures and we can only prosper as a community. Guns only exist to take away lives (of creatures, humans, etc) and destroy those communities.

Yes you can "practice" with them, but what are you practicing for? The zombie apocalypse?

I want to thank you for your pure awesomeness that has had me laughing for sometime today.

Yes I am in your words a "nutjob". I do own a shotgun and have only used it for target shooting. So I guess you are right that I did take away that piece of papers life.

Do I feel that something needs to be done to stop the TRUE CRAZIES yes! But no matter what is done, if there is a will there is a way.
 

Geosurface

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2012
5,776
4
0
Out of respect for those who suffered on this terrible, tragic day I say to you "go fuck yourself", your an arrogant little child, nothing more..

What meaning does your supposed sympathy for these children have?

I, too, of course think it's a horrible tragedy and the guy was a sick, twisted piece of shit. It's an absolutely horrible event.

But you and I aren't directly connected to it or anyone involved in it.

So what importance, impact, or significance does you wringing your hands and shit on some message board have? Is it just you grand standing and taking the supposed moral high ground? Does the fact that you are trying to use their deaths for political agendas you had prior to it happening reduce the merits of your supposed sympathies? I'd say it sure as shit does.

I don't feel the need to make some big show of my grief for strangers I've never met. I feel the appropriate amount of sympathy and grief, which is to say a fairly low and abstract amount. In the abstract, it's absolutely horrible. Could I sit around on the couch with a box of Kleenex watching Nancy Grace or something as she shows pictures of the kids and cries her crocodile tears? Of course I could.

If I did that, I'd feel like I was basically feasting on the carcass of other peoples' grief. Using it to fuel my own self-centered "grief orgy" - and why? I have no idea.

The media is a big part of the problem with things like this. They feed in to sick peoples' sick desires to gain infamy by doing shit like this.

And then they turn around and feed into other weird peoples' desire to do some sort of grief-fueled emotional masturbation.

The people who know the parents directly, their extended family and those in their community, or people who don't know them but live near them and see them at the store, and extend offers of emotional support, help with funeral costs, "call me if you need anything" who make sure they don't spend too much time alone, or at least no time alone they don't WISH to spend, and try to help them recover form the grief of this... those people have my utmost respect.

Strangers in some other state or country who make some big spectacle of their "grief" and sympathy? And using it to push political desires and to try to silence other people pushing back against that, or use it as a conversational leverage to guilt trip others into changing their views or whatever? They can suck it.
 

BUTCH1

Lifer
Jul 15, 2000
20,433
1,769
126
What meaning does your supposed sympathy for these children have?

I, too, of course think it's a horrible tragedy and the guy was a sick, twisted piece of shit. It's an absolutely horrible event.

But you and I aren't directly connected to it or anyone involved in it.

So what importance, impact, or significance does you wringing your hands and shit on some message board have? Is it just you grand standing and taking the supposed moral high ground? Does the fact that you are trying to use their deaths for political agendas you had prior to it happening reduce the merits of your supposed sympathies? I'd say it sure as shit does.

I don't feel the need to make some big show of my grief for strangers I've never met. I feel the appropriate amount of sympathy and grief, which is to say a fairly low and abstract amount. In the abstract, it's absolutely horrible. Could I sit around on the couch with a box of Kleenex watching Nancy Grace or something as she shows pictures of the kids and cries her crocodile tears? Of course I could.

If I did that, I'd feel like I was basically feasting on the carcass of other peoples' grief. Using it to fuel my own self-centered "grief orgy" - and why? I have no idea.

The media is a big part of the problem with things like this. They feed in to sick peoples' sick desires to gain infamy by doing shit like this.

And then they turn around and feed into other weird peoples' desire to do some sort of grief-fueled emotional masturbation.

The people who know the parents directly, their extended family and those in their community, or people who don't know them but live near them and see them at the store, and extend offers of emotional support, help with funeral costs, "call me if you need anything" who make sure they don't spend too much time alone, or at least no time alone they don't WISH to spend, and try to help them recover form the grief of this... those people have my utmost respect.

Strangers in some other state or country who make some big spectacle of their "grief" and sympathy? And using it to push political desires and to try to silence other people pushing back against that, or use it as a conversational leverage to guilt trip others into changing their views or whatever? They can suck it.

None of us can feel the grief like those who lost their children or parents or brother, I'd rather leave any agenda out of it but the fact remains it happened and people in this country are getting sick and fucking tired of seeing these kinds of events happen, if some laws need changing (I'm not sure if it will help at this point) why not now? is this not enough evidence that change is needed?, let's get the NRA OUT of every local politician's pocketbook and start making laws that MIGHT help..
 

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,819
1,126
126
20 fucking kids were killed... in seconds. Honestly, if you had half a fucking brain you'd shut the fuck up about gun rights now.

In short, fuck off.

This. Card carrying member here who wish people like the OP would just STFU. These are just as inane as the gun grabbing posts... too soon.
 
Last edited:

CZroe

Lifer
Jun 24, 2001
24,195
856
126
That is the dumbest argument ever, and all gun supporters use it. The difference is one product is DESIGNED to kill people, the other is not.

And as I said, I'm not for banning guns. I'm for putting the same regulations on them as we have on other products that AREN'T designed to kill people.


One is a priviledge. One is a right. The only reason those restrictions on driving are legal is because of that distinction. Remember all that stuff about "is it a tax or a fine?" when discussing Obamacare? You can't compell someone to buy something to exercise their legal right. You can tax.
 
Last edited:

Geosurface

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2012
5,776
4
0
Better yet, maybe you should try selling your bullshit diatribe to one of the parents of a child who was murdered today.

I think all questions of law and politics should be determined by finding the most emotionally compromised person on that particular issue in the country and then asking them what they think. Whether it's someone who was just raped, burglarized, lost their mother in a car wreck, you name it. They are clearly the most appropriate source for sober, rational thinking.

Btw do you honestly believe not a single gun owner was among the parents?
 

SlitheryDee

Lifer
Feb 2, 2005
17,252
19
81
I honestly don't give a shit about guns, but I need one because criminals have them. Take them from the criminals FIRST, and I might be more amenable to the prospect. Don't fucking leave me defenseless while any two bit thug can break into my house with a black market piece and blow me away. Too hard to take them away from the criminals? Tough shit. Try harder. I support gun control laws that work solely to that end.
 
Last edited:

Brigandier

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2008
4,395
2
81
I honestly don't give a shit about guns, but I need one because criminals have them. Take them from the criminals FIRST, and I might be more amenable to the prospect. Don't fucking leave me defenseless while any two bit thug can break into my house with a black market piece and blow me away. Too hard to take them away from the criminals? Tough shit. Try harder. I support gun control laws that work solely to that end.

Steps to acquiring a black market piece:

1) Find a legal gun owner
2) Take that gun
3) ?
4)Sell it to others looking for a black market piece, profit.
 

BUTCH1

Lifer
Jul 15, 2000
20,433
1,769
126
I think all questions of law and politics should be determined by finding the most emotionally compromised person on that particular issue in the country and then asking them what they think. Whether it's someone who was just raped, burglarized, lost their mother in a car wreck, you name it. They are clearly the most appropriate source for sober, rational thinking.

Btw do you honestly believe not a single gun owner was among the parents?

Sorry, the "emotionally compromised" in this instance would be almost any human being with any sense of how horrible this is for so many people, those brutally slaughtered at 5yrs old and the parents who must now find a way to pick up the pieces and try and move on...
 

Broheim

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2011
4,592
2
81
Switzerland------0.7

In switzerland practically every male above the age of 18 has a government issued SIG SG 550 assault rifle and the government subsidizes ammo. they are even bigger gun nuts in switzerland than you americans.
 

Geosurface

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2012
5,776
4
0
Sorry, the "emotionally compromised" in this instance would be almost any human being with any sense of how horrible this is for so many people, those brutally slaughtered at 5yrs old and the parents who must now find a way to pick up the pieces and try and move on...

What role do you think emotion should play in law making?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |