... are you happy with the way it's going so far?
Interesting & thought-provoking article.
Interesting & thought-provoking article.
September 17, 2009, 9:30 pm
The Referendum
By Tim Kreider
Recently an editor asked me for an essay about arrested adolescence, joking: ?Of course, I thought of you.?
It is worth mentioning that this editor is an old college friend; we?ve driven across the country, been pantsless in several nonsexual contexts, and accidentally hospitalized each other in good fun. He is now a respectable homeowner and family man; I am not. So I couldn?t help but wonder: is there something condescending about this assignment? Does he consider me some sort of amusing and feckless manchild instead of a respected cartoonist whose work is beloved by hundreds and has made me a thousandaire, who?s been in a committed relationship for 15 years with the same cat?
My weird touchiness on this issue ? taking offense at someone offering to pay me money for my work ? is symptomatic of a more widespread syndrome I call ?The Referendum.?
To my friends with children, the obscene wealth of free time at my command must seem unimaginably exotic, since their next thousand Saturdays are already booked.
The Referendum is a phenomenon typical of (but not limited to) midlife, whereby people, increasingly aware of the finiteness of their time in the world, the limitations placed on them by their choices so far, and the narrowing options remaining to them, start judging their peers? differing choices with reactions ranging from envy to contempt. The Referendum can subtly poison formerly close and uncomplicated relationships, creating tensions between the married and the single, the childless and parents, careerists and the stay-at-home. It?s exacerbated by the far greater diversity of options available to us now than a few decades ago, when everyone had to follow the same drill. We?re all anxiously sizing up how everyone else?s decisions have worked out to reassure ourselves that our own are vindicated ? that we are, in some sense, winning.
It?s especially conspicuous among friends from youth. Young adulthood is an anomalous time in people?s lives; they?re as unlike themselves as they?re ever going to be, experimenting with substances and sex, ideology and religion, trying on different identities before their personalities immutably set. Some people flirt briefly with being freethinking bohemians before becoming their parents. Friends who seemed pretty much indistinguishable from you in your 20s make different choices about family or career, and after a decade or two these initial differences yield such radically divergent trajectories that when you get together again you can only regard each other?s lives with bemused incomprehension.
I may be exceptionally conscious of the Referendum because my life is so different from most of my cohort?s; at 42 I?ve never been married and don?t want kids. I recently had dinner with some old friends, a couple with two small children, and when I told them about my typical Saturday in New York City ? doing the Times crossword, stopping off at a local flea market, maybe biking across the Brooklyn Bridge ? they looked at me like I was describing my battles with the fierce and elusive Squid-Men among the moons of Neptune. The obscene wealth of free time at my command must?ve seemed unimaginably exotic to them, since their next thousand Saturdays are already booked.
What they also can?t imagine is having too much time on your hands, being unable to fill the hours, having to just sit and stare at the emptiness at the center of your life. But I?m sure that to them this problem seems as pitiable as morbid obesity would to the victims of famine.
A lot of my married friends take a vicarious interest in my personal life. It?s usually just nosy, prurient fun, but sometimes smacks of the sort of moralism that H.G. Wells called ?jealousy with a halo.? Sometimes it seems sort of starved, like audiences in the Great Depression watching musicals about the glitterati. It?s true that my romantic life has produced some humorous anecdotes, but good stories seldom come from happy experiences. Some of my married friends may envy my freedom in an abstract, daydreamy way, misremembering single life as some sort of pornographic smorgasbord, but I doubt many of them would actually choose to trade places with me. Although they may miss the thrill of sexual novelty, absolutely nobody misses dating.
We only get one chance at this, with no do-overs. Life is, in effect, a non-repeatable experiment with no control.
I regard their more conventional domestic lives with the same sort of ambivalence. Like everyone, I?ve seen some marriages in which I would discreetly hang myself within 12 hours, but others have given me cause to envy their intimacy, loyalty, and irreplaceable decades of invested history. [Note to all my married friends: your marriage is one of the latter.] Though one of those friends cautioned me against idealizing: ?It?s not as if being married means you?re any less alone.?
Most of my married friends now have children, the rewards of which appear to be exclusively intangible and, like the mysteries of some gnostic sect, incommunicable to outsiders. In fact it seems from the outside as if these people have joined a dubious cult: they claim to be much happier and more fulfilled than ever before, even though they live in conditions of appalling filth and degradation, deprived of the most basic freedoms and dignity, and owe unquestioning obedience to a capricious and demented master.
I have never even idly thought for a single passing second that it might make my life nicer to have a small, rude, incontinent person follow me around screaming and making me buy them stuff for the rest of my life. [Note to friends with children: I am referring to other people?s children, not to yours.] But there are also moments when some part of me wonders whether I am not only missing the biological boat but something I cannot even begin to imagine ? an entire dimension of human experience undetectable to my senses, like a flatlander scoffing at the theoretical concept of sky.
But I can only imagine the paralytic terror that must seize my friends with families as they lie awake calculating mortgage payments and college funds and realize that they are locked into their present lives for farther into the future than the mind?s eye can see. Judging from the unanimity with which parents preface any gripe about children with the disclaimer, ?Although I would never wish I hadn?t had them and I can?t imagine life without them,? I can?t help but wonder whether they don?t have to repress precisely these thoughts on a daily basis.
Yes: the Referendum gets unattractively self-righteous and judgmental. Quite a lot of what passes itself off as a dialogue about our society consists of people trying to justify their own choices as the only right or natural ones by denouncing others? as selfish or pathological or wrong. So it?s easy to overlook that hidden beneath all this smug certainty is a poignant insecurity, and the naked 3 A.M. terror of regret.
The problem is, we only get one chance at this, with no do-overs. Life is, in effect, a non-repeatable experiment with no control. In his novel about marriage, ?Light Years,? James Salter writes: ?For whatever we do, even whatever we do not do prevents us from doing its opposite. Acts demolish their alternatives, that is the paradox.? Watching our peers? lives is the closest we can come to a glimpse of the parallel universes in which we didn?t ruin that relationship years ago, or got that job we applied for, or got on that plane after all. It?s tempting to read other people?s lives as cautionary fables or repudiations of our own.
A colleague of mine once hosted a visiting cartoonist from Scandinavia who was on a promotional tour. My colleague, who has a university job, a wife and children, was clearly a little wistful about the tour, imagining Brussels, Paris, and London, meeting new fans and colleagues and being taken out for beers every night. The cartoonist, meanwhile, looked forlornly around at his host?s pleasant row house and sighed, almost to himself: ?I would like to have such a house.?
One of the hardest things to look at in this life is the lives we didn?t lead, the path not taken, potential left unfulfilled. In stories, those who look back ? Lot?s wife, Orpheus and Eurydice ? are lost. Looking to the side instead, to gauge how our companions are faring, is a way of glancing at a safer reflection of what we cannot directly bear, like Perseus seeing the Gorgon safely mirrored in his shield.