Here is Something you should probably look at. Now the AMD 5200 is basicly a FX62 but with a slightly slower clock which can be fixed quite easily.
Now this is probably going to start a flame war from all these people pissed off that they paid 300$ for a mobo and then another 400$ on a CPU that isnt even as fast as the X6800 in the review. But for those of you who are open minded. You can actually see the FX 62 BEAT the great X6800, intels pride and joy, in this test.
Ofcourse the FX62 is quite pointless when you can get the 5200X2 and OC it VERY mildly to get to and past FX62 speeds.
I think i may have been right when i predicted AMD would be back at intels throats quite quickly. Ofcourse this is hardly beating the Conroes as much as would justify the word "Kicking ass" but after everyone made all that hype about conroe kicking AMDs ass. It seems quite lower then KICKING ass to me.
PS. Please dont flame with AMD Fanboy crap because i gave you some kind of info to use against intel. And Intel fanboys please dont flame because you are pissed that you switched possibly prematurely.
Now this is probably going to start a flame war from all these people pissed off that they paid 300$ for a mobo and then another 400$ on a CPU that isnt even as fast as the X6800 in the review. But for those of you who are open minded. You can actually see the FX 62 BEAT the great X6800, intels pride and joy, in this test.
Ofcourse the FX62 is quite pointless when you can get the 5200X2 and OC it VERY mildly to get to and past FX62 speeds.
I think i may have been right when i predicted AMD would be back at intels throats quite quickly. Ofcourse this is hardly beating the Conroes as much as would justify the word "Kicking ass" but after everyone made all that hype about conroe kicking AMDs ass. It seems quite lower then KICKING ass to me.
PS. Please dont flame with AMD Fanboy crap because i gave you some kind of info to use against intel. And Intel fanboys please dont flame because you are pissed that you switched possibly prematurely.