This graph has absolutely nothing to do with creationism.
I love how everyone states that evolution, big bang, etc is fact, yet everyone forgets that it is a theory, and there is no solid proof of any of it
I love how everyone states that evolution, big bang, etc is fact, yet everyone forgets that it is a theory, and there is no solid proof of any of it
Oy....here we go again with the theory crowd.I love how everyone states that evolution, big bang, etc is fact, yet everyone forgets that it is a theory, and there is no solid proof of any of it
And the evidence to support them is as nonexistent as the deities to whom the events are attributed.It's closer to fact than a book of fairy tales is. The theories haven't been disproven, in contrast to the fairy tales which have been disproven from several different angles.
yah, you forgot to add gravity too...silly scientists
yah, you forgot to add gravity too...silly scientists
It's closer to fact than a book of fairy tales is. The theories haven't been disproven, in contrast to the fairy tales which have been disproven from several different angles.
How people believe that our earth is 6,000 years old is beyond me. The fact that these beliefs are still around today just absolutely baffles me.
I recently got into a debate with a couple of these ignoramuses. In the picture below you will probably laugh, probably become frustrated, and maybe even cry.
http://members.cox.net/oriont3/youngearthcreationistfails.jpg
Gravity is hardly proof of any evolutionary or big bang theory.
"Closer to the fact" does not make it fact.
And I'd like you to prove that it is closer, and prove that creationism has been disproven.
Gravity is hardly proof of any evolutionary or big bang theory. Yeah, it is a theory, but the evidence of gravity is clearly visible. Drop something, it falls. We know how it works.
"Closer to the fact" does not make it fact.
And I'd like you to prove that it is closer, and prove that creationism has been disproven.
Gravity is hardly proof of any evolutionary or big bang theory. Yeah, it is a theory, but the evidence of gravity is clearly visible. Drop something, it falls. We know how it works.
Well heck, we already do that - we just don't do it for the Religion of the Century, the ones which happen to be the fad in the here and now.old earth creationism is not much better. I hope I get to see the day we have a president who is an atheist. That would be the true next step. I hope in 500 years people look back and laugh at how religion was so common back in the day. Just what is so bad about facing reality that people turn to outrageous ancient stories? I'll never understand it. If you think the people that created things like scientology are loons realize that whoever created your religion is no different. They all play on people's insecurity and have zero proof of their claims.
No, we know that it works.Gravity is hardly proof of any evolutionary or big bang theory. Yeah, it is a theory, but the evidence of gravity is clearly visible. Drop something, it falls. We know how it works.
I shall now post all legitimate evidence supporting Creationism, complete with source citations.And I'd like you to prove that it is closer, and prove that creationism has been disproven.
If that was the case, I could fly. Evolution is far less understood, specifically how life even began, which has not been observed, has not been repeated.The simple fact is that there is far more evidence supporting evolution through natural selection than there is supporting our theory of gravity.
Gravity is hardly proof of any evolutionary or big bang theory. Yeah, it is a theory, but the evidence of gravity is clearly visible. Drop something, it falls. We know how it works.
If that was the case, I could fly. Evolution is far less understood, specifically how life even began, which has not been observed, has not been repeated.
Please refrain from comparing your creationist world of make believe to work produced by real science.
Real science is the stuff that doesn't use some magic ghost in the sky to make their theories work.
Oy vey, some people never Learn.
That is a rather infantile understanding of "the proof" of how we know gravity works.
The simple fact is that there is far more evidence supporting evolution through natural selection than there is supporting our theory of gravity. It is observational on many levels. There are far more tests available and angles with which to examine and explain the many, many ways in which evolution acts that there remains no foundation with which to credibly deny it as a natural law.
I'd say something more along the lines of "we know how gravity will act", but we certainly cannot clearly say why gravity is doing what it does.
And the big bang has plenty of evidence for it - #1 being background radiation.
I miss :confused; right now.If that was the case, I could fly. Evolution is far less understood, specifically how life even began, which has not been observed, has not been repeated.
Have agriculturalists really created new species or just variants?I miss :confused; right now.
Ancient people didn't understand nuclear fusion, but that didn't mean they could create blasts of million-degree plasma at will.
We've seen evolution work, we've even guided it on many occasions. (Agriculture.)
The only only only reason you can't watch "species" changing into other ones drastically different is because you don't live long enough.
OK, so where did the stuff and that background radiation come from in the first place? Had to come from somewhere
Have agriculturalists really created new species or just variants?
Both of you fail. Just throwing random comments contributes nothing. Maybe you can't really refute what I said so that's the best you can do?
Gravity is hardly proof of any evolutionary or And I'd like you to prove that it is closer, and prove that creationism has been disproven.
If that was the case, I could fly. Evolution is far less understood, specifically how life even began, which has not been observed, has not been repeated.