Your guns are useless

[f1sherman]

Lets face it.
Your weapon has no purpose other than sports & recreation, and basically you are just a kid fighting for his Nintendo. I got that far before recognizing that this is nothing but a trolling thread. There are already plenty of threads discussing the ownership of firearms. -Admin DrPizza

Sorry if I miss-judged YOU, but I am speaking here about 99.99+% of you gun owners.

Your weapon is a very poor self-defense tool.
1st of all, it does not intimidate anyone, least of all the "bad guy".
2nd, if the "bad guy" has the job to do, he'll do it one way or the other.

Sure enough, your gun might be worth it's price, but only if you have a complete retard against yourself.
And I am not saying that's impossible, hence 99.99% above.
But how convenient is that?
Here it comes, your one and only chance to prove everyone you're a tough guy, and your gun is pointed at a complete moron. Really??
Where is the glory? Why not just set your dog on him, or cut him open from dick to his chin, or just kick the shit out of the idiot who dared to enter your property?
But more important, how is any of that realistic?

Speaking about realism, and about THE REAL WORLD...

It's not like your weapon would do you any good in a real world.
Say in world of New York state governed Mafia.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bovopx5Z71I
http://truth-out.org/news/item/10943-the-death-of-sunny-sheu

So you see, your weapon is basically just a toy gun,
which is pretty consistent with your militia
another childish concept, having no purpose other than camping, drinking and shitting in the creek.

 

[Jaskalas]

Government bans people from protecting themselves, cause government is on the job. Isn't that right Chicago?

 

[Olikan]

but...but...but... the second amend

 

[monovillage]

Let's see. Government is so corrupt that it is running around murdering innocent citizens and stonewalling/covering up the murders and somehow you claim that citizens owning firearms are useless?
This administration is corrupt, it is evil, it does murder citizens and it does stonewall/cover up legitimate investigations, but I don't see where it has anything to do with the 2nd Amendment.
Good try though.

 

[Olikan]

Let's see. Government is so corrupt that it is running around murdering innocent citizens and stonewalling/covering up the murders and somehow you claim that citizens owning firearms are useless?
This administration is corrupt, it is evil, it does murder citizens and it does stonewall/cover up legitimate investigations, but I don't see where it has anything to do with the 2nd Amendment.
Good try though.

do you live in china?

 

[sm625]

It must be nice to be that ignorant. For all you know a gun has saved your sorry brainwashed ass and you dont even know it any more than you know that your educational system was designed to make you this retarded. Every 15 minutes a violent crime is prevented by guns. 99+% of the time the gun is never discharged.

 

[monovillage]

do you live in china?

N. California, can you read?
Public school?

 

[irishScott]

The OP reads like parody, but with some of the idiocy I've seen floating around just might be serious...

 

[waggy]

Government bans people from protecting themselves, cause government is on the job. Isn't that right Chicago?

that's because they don't have enough gun control!

 

[Olikan]

N. California, can you read?
Public school?

oh...i thought the govenment just went on people's houses and kill them

you know, shit like this happen in china

 

[schneiderguy]

So you see, your weapon is basically just a toy gun,

I assure you, my firearms are not toys.

Once your Mommy lets you have something more powerful than an airsoft gun you might understand.

 

[Agent11]

Fisherman is trawling I would say.

 

[etrigan420]

Lets face it.
Your weapon has no purpose other than sports & recreation, and basically you are just a kid fighting for his Nintendo.

Sorry if I miss-judged YOU, but I am speaking here about 99.99+% of you gun owners.

Your weapon is a very poor self-defense tool.
1st of all, it does not intimidate anyone, least of all the "bad guy".
2nd, if the "bad guy" has the job to do, he'll do it one way or the other.

Sure enough, your gun might be worth it's price, but only if you have a complete retard against yourself.
And I am not saying that's impossible, hence 99.99% above.
But how convenient is that?
Here it comes, your one and only chance to prove everyone you're a tough guy, and your gun is pointed at a complete moron. Really??
Where is the glory? Why not just set your dog on him, or cut him open from dick to his chin, or just kick the shit out of the idiot who dared to enter your property?
But more important, how is any of that realistic?

Speaking about realism, and about THE REAL WORLD...

It's not like your weapon would do you any good in a real world.
Say in world of New York state governed Mafia.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bovopx5Z71I
http://truth-out.org/news/item/10943-the-death-of-sunny-sheu

So you see, your weapon is basically just a toy gun,
which is pretty consistent with your militia
another childish concept, having no purpose other than camping, drinking and shitting in the creek.

The only thing I got from this is that you need to study a bit harder for your GED, especially the "English" portion.

 

[Doppel]

Is OP mad because his country and/or wife won't let him buy a gun? If they are so useless the cops should be relieved of them.

Obviously most gun owners will never use in defense and only for sporting but his understanding I the criminal mind is very weak. Criminals go for easy prey, like any predator does in the animal kingdom. Not being easy prey reduces chance of being a target.

 

[sigurros81]

I think the OP forgot to take his pills. We need have Incorruptible and Spidey up in this thread along with the OP? It will be quite the entertainment having stupid argue against stupid.

 

[CrackRabbit]

What is it about this place that pulls in so many trolls?

 

[Matt1970]

Try breaking into the house of one of us "toy gun" owners and see how much of a toy it really is.

 

[Moonbeam]

What I find objectionable about your post follows:

f1sherman;34508914]Lets face it
Your weapon has no purpose other than sports & recreation, and basically you are just a kid fighting for his Nintendo.

M: This is an opinion. You could have said, I see no purpose, do you. This is why I see no purpose, do these make sense to you?

f: Sorry if I miss-judged YOU, but I am speaking here about 99.99+% of you gun owners.

M: Why apologize for a statement you could just edit and not commit?

f: Your weapon is a very poor self-defense tool.
1st of all, it does not intimidate anyone, least of all the "bad guy".

M: As assertion of reasons but unproven. I agree in part but I would never speak for all bad guys as if I knew their state of fear.

F: 2nd, if the "bad guy" has the job to do, he'll do it one way or the other.

M: Muddy, incoherent thinking? What are you talking about.

f: Sure enough, your gun might be worth it's price, but only if you have a complete retard against yourself.

M: This is barely coherent in my opinion. How can I argue with mere opinion?

f: And I am not saying that's impossible, hence 99.99% above.
But how convenient is that?

M: Huh?

f: Here it comes, your one and only chance to prove everyone you're a tough guy, and your gun is pointed at a complete moron. Really??
Where is the glory? Why not just set your dog on him, or cut him open from dick to his chin, or just kick the shit out of the idiot who dared to enter your property?
But more important, how is any of that realistic?

M: I would definitely order a reality check, but perhaps not the one you envision. I would recommend a less 'cool guy' language or whatever this is, and more confidence in your position. You want to persuade me, not assault me before I even reply.

f: Speaking about realism, and about THE REAL WORLD...

It's not like your weapon would do you any good in a real world.
Say in world of New York state governed Mafia.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bovopx5Z71I
http://truth-out.org/news/item/10943-the-death-of-sunny-sheu

So you see, your weapon is basically just a toy gun,
which is pretty consistent with your militia
another childish concept, having no purpose other than camping, drinking and shitting in the creek.[/QUOTE]

M: What I see is an attempt to prove a universal from a small sample.

 

[exdeath]

Good they are useless, so they don't pose any problems. Leave them be.

 

[chucky2]

Bravo OP. You've re-created the friday night "assult weapons" conversation talking points from the local lefty college coffee shop hangout. You earned a cookie, but there are people less fortunate than you, so it's being given to them. 'Bummer...

 

[werepossum]

Bravo OP. You've re-created the friday night "assult weapons" conversation talking points from the local lefty college coffee shop hangout. You earned a cookie, but there are people less fortunate than you, so it's being given to them. 'Bummer...

If he learned that in a local lefty college coffee shop hangout he was clearly behind the counter. Except when there's mopping to be done.

 

[michal1980]

OPs' brain is useless.

And if guns are harmless, why regulate?

 

[Lemon law]

As a legitimate sports hunter, I agree 100% with fisherman. Does anyone rationally think a rag tag citizens militia armed with conventional firearms would stand a change against any modern army equipped with artillery pieces with ranges up to 10 miles, also equipped with air craft, bombs, tanks, drones, would stand a snowballs chance in hell?
But maybe point granted, it somewhat possible as the US military and other governments have lost to insurgents in Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan. But still its a NRA fallacy in the USA, to stand a chance as an insurgent movement anywhere, you have to be popular with the local population, and earth to NRA, you and your totally nutty crapola is becoming less and less popular in the USA each and every day. When we have both an exponential domestic rise in gun violence in the USA, and the NRA stupidly opposes any measures that could reduce the number of firearms in the hands of total nuts and criminals. With total NRA nuts often now the definition of the current NRA nuts who want to be able to conceal and carry so they can be a vigilante mob member like George Zimmerman and slay a 16 year old kid armed with only a box of candy and a soft drink.

As the fellow I 100% disagree with is. " sm625 who says, "Every 15 minutes a violent crime is prevented by guns. 99+% of the time the gun is never discharged."

As I call it a bogus statistic and pure NRA fiction. As I call for an iota of proof from sm625.

 

[Doppel]

As a legitimate sports hunter, I agree 100% with fisherman. Does anyone rationally think a rag tag citizens militia armed with conventional firearms would stand a change against any modern army equipped with artillery pieces with ranges up to 10 miles, also equipped with air craft, bombs, tanks, drones, would stand a snowballs chance in hell?

Not in open combat, of course.

But maybe point granted, it somewhat possible as the US military and other governments have lost to insurgents in Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan.

Yes. Though in spirit I really can see almost no eventuality that pits any substantial number of Americans against the government. The chances of the government at both times having:

1) A strong military consisting of US citizens
2) A massive number of US citizens against the government

Just seems unlikely and would only happen via a huge change in gov to dictatorship.

When we have both an exponential domestic rise in gun violence in the USA

Do we? Violence itself is down precipitously over the past two decades despite more guns than ever in the country. I can't find a good chart showing gun violence over time, though personally I don't care if I'm stabbed vs shot, it makes no difference.

With total NRA nuts often now the definition of the current NRA nuts who want to be able to conceal and carry so they can be a vigilante mob member like George Zimmerman and slay a 16 year old kid armed with only a box of candy and a soft drink.

You know as well as I do that case is likely to be found for GZ and if it is many (including me) will end up concluding that his gun actually saved him receiving further injury if not death, making a strong case for concealed carry, not against it as you're trying. This is a really bad example you use when in fact there are plenty of good ones to support your view.

As the fellow I 100% disagree with is. " sm625 who says, "Every 15 minutes a violent crime is prevented by guns. 99+% of the time the gun is never discharged."

It does seem a hard thing to prove as right or wrong. I think he's getting at guns inciting fear in evil doers and I am sure you'd agree they do. Guns are a powerful deterrent.

 

[Agent11]

The supreme court has upheld the right to bear arms. It is a long standing right and tradition in the US.

You are the one with the radical ideas attempting to infringe on the rights of others Lemon.