While I will likely build a RyZen system or two, my main hope was that RyZen would motivate Intel.
They offer same or better performance as the 6900k at $600 less. Who cares if it 5 or 10fps slower in some games at 1080p?
Really? That is the big deal? 5-10fps slower on some games at only 1080p? There are some specific edge cases where the intel chips are still 15% to 20% faster, but that is just specific code optimization, nothing AMD can do if those specific programs are fully optimized for Intel.
Overall all of the big and known programs have the 1800X equal of faster than the 6900k and it cost s$600 less. Its an 8 core chip for $500 or you can go the 1700 core for $330, that is EIGHT CORES for $330, and overclock it to 4.1GHz which seems to be about the max stable OC you can get on all cores.
Its absurd value! Nothing Intel offers comes even close. The 7700k is better for games at 1080p, who would spend $300+ on a CPU and game at 1080p or lower?
When gaming at 1440p or higher there is no difference! And at 1080p it can be slower about 5 to 10fps, big deal! In many cases disabling AMD's hyperthreading improved performance anywhere from 4-6fps in various games. So at that point you have it equal to the 6900k in gaming as well.
Sure these things need to be sorted out and you don't need to disable smt to get higher frames, but they will be solved. Through bios updates, through chipset updates and through iterations of the processor, newer steppings it will only get better.
If I'm already on a 4770k I might not see that big of a reason to upgrade if I don't do any content creation or office work. If I use my PC primarily for gaming and some light work and otherwise web browsing, I don't need to upgrade my 4770k with any newer processor. Not Ryzen, not any Intel offering. But if I want to game for example and stream at the same time, if I want to do content creation, video editing and stuff, I want to do office work, etc...then getting an 8 core Ryzen for $330 to $500 is absurd value!