meltdown75
Lifer
- Nov 17, 2004
- 37,558
- 7
- 81
Originally posted by: mugs
Not to mention 551 stores out of 3500 is a really large sample size. We use polls of 1000 people to figure out how 100 million will vote!
E. Reported Police Incidents: A Comparison of Wal-Mart & Target Stores
A critical question explored by the ?Is Wal-Mart Safe?? study is whether Wal-Mart stores are unique in
experiencing a significant average rate of reported police incidents or do other nearby ?big box stores?
experience similar rates of reported police incidents. In theory, both Wal-Mart and nearby Target stores
should be expected to experience roughly similar rates of reported police incidents. In order to address this
question, a second phase of the ?Is Wal-Mart Safe?? safe study compared and contrasted the rates of police
incidents reported between select Wal-Mart stores and nearby Target stores.
This phase of the study focused on the 50 Wal-Mart stores out of the 460 analyzed stores that experienced
the ?highest rate? of reported police incidents in 2004. Target stores chosen for the comparative analysis
were within a 10-mile radius of the 50 ?high incident? Wal-Mart stores. Of these 50 ?high incident? Wal-
Mart stores, three stores did not have a Target within 10 miles, leaving a sample of 47 Wal-Mart stores for
further analysis. Because of further data restrictions, the sample for comparison was limited to 32 Wal-Mart
stores and 30 nearby Target stores.
Originally posted by: Amused
Curious how only one person questioned the source. It's also curious how the source of this website does not readily identify itself.
Well, a little research and I found the source: WakeUpWalMart.com
They are a pro-union, anti-walmart group who spends all their time trying to tear Walmart down with various propaganda campaigns.
They couldn't give two sh!ts if you're safe at Walmart or not. Their sole purpose is to destroy Walmart. This is just another fear tactic.
Congrats, folks! You've been duped by political propaganda. :beer:
Originally posted by: Minjin
Originally posted by: Amused
Curious how only one person questioned the source. It's also curious how the source of this website does not readily identify itself.
Well, a little research and I found the source: WakeUpWalMart.com
They are a pro-union, anti-walmart group who spends all their time trying to tear Walmart down with various propaganda campaigns.
They couldn't give two sh!ts if you're safe at Walmart or not. Their sole purpose is to destroy Walmart. This is just another fear tactic.
Congrats, folks! You've been duped by political propaganda. :beer:
Actually, I try to look at whats being said not the person who's saying it. The source doesn't make fact any less truthful. It was obviously extremely biased from the start but what if it was true? As we can see though, the "scientific" study has proved to be anything but...
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: Minjin
Originally posted by: Amused
Curious how only one person questioned the source. It's also curious how the source of this website does not readily identify itself.
Well, a little research and I found the source: WakeUpWalMart.com
They are a pro-union, anti-walmart group who spends all their time trying to tear Walmart down with various propaganda campaigns.
They couldn't give two sh!ts if you're safe at Walmart or not. Their sole purpose is to destroy Walmart. This is just another fear tactic.
Congrats, folks! You've been duped by political propaganda. :beer:
Actually, I try to look at whats being said not the person who's saying it. The source doesn't make fact any less truthful. It was obviously extremely biased from the start but what if it was true? As we can see though, the "scientific" study has proved to be anything but...
True, very true. However, when reading unsubstantiated statistics it is always good to consider the source.
The page makes an attempt to seem concerned about crime at the Walmarts and want to help. When in reality, they would do anything to make things worse for Walmart. The site is misleading through and through.
And as you can see, the vast majority fell for this propaganda hook, line and sinker.
Originally posted by: eits
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: Minjin
Originally posted by: Amused
Curious how only one person questioned the source. It's also curious how the source of this website does not readily identify itself.
Well, a little research and I found the source: WakeUpWalMart.com
They are a pro-union, anti-walmart group who spends all their time trying to tear Walmart down with various propaganda campaigns.
They couldn't give two sh!ts if you're safe at Walmart or not. Their sole purpose is to destroy Walmart. This is just another fear tactic.
Congrats, folks! You've been duped by political propaganda. :beer:
Actually, I try to look at whats being said not the person who's saying it. The source doesn't make fact any less truthful. It was obviously extremely biased from the start but what if it was true? As we can see though, the "scientific" study has proved to be anything but...
True, very true. However, when reading unsubstantiated statistics it is always good to consider the source.
The page makes an attempt to seem concerned about crime at the Walmarts and want to help. When in reality, they would do anything to make things worse for Walmart. The site is misleading through and through.
And as you can see, the vast majority fell for this propaganda hook, line and sinker.
proof that it's misleading?
walmart IS the devil, so i'd be more inclined to believe it...
did you hear the story that came out yesterday involving walmart not paying its workers overtime for the past 5 years?
Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
Sorry, we have no data for Wal-Mart stores within 100 miles of 39440. Please write your local police department and request a report
FY2005 Revenue Target: 52,620,000,000
That was their target revenue, what was their actual?
Originally posted by: Minjin
Originally posted by: mugs
Not to mention 551 stores out of 3500 is a really large sample size. We use polls of 1000 people to figure out how 100 million will vote!
You obviously didn't read too far into it:
E. Reported Police Incidents: A Comparison of Wal-Mart & Target Stores
A critical question explored by the ?Is Wal-Mart Safe?? study is whether Wal-Mart stores are unique in
experiencing a significant average rate of reported police incidents or do other nearby ?big box stores?
experience similar rates of reported police incidents. In theory, both Wal-Mart and nearby Target stores
should be expected to experience roughly similar rates of reported police incidents. In order to address this
question, a second phase of the ?Is Wal-Mart Safe?? safe study compared and contrasted the rates of police
incidents reported between select Wal-Mart stores and nearby Target stores.
This phase of the study focused on the 50 Wal-Mart stores out of the 460 analyzed stores that experienced
the ?highest rate? of reported police incidents in 2004. Target stores chosen for the comparative analysis
were within a 10-mile radius of the 50 ?high incident? Wal-Mart stores. Of these 50 ?high incident? Wal-
Mart stores, three stores did not have a Target within 10 miles, leaving a sample of 47 Wal-Mart stores for
further analysis. Because of further data restrictions, the sample for comparison was limited to 32 Wal-Mart
stores and 30 nearby Target stores.
I completely missed that, and I even scanned through twice looking for it.Originally posted by: mugs
No mention is made of how the stores were chosen? It's right in the report. It seems like everyone in this thread is making all sorts of authoritative comments without even reading the report.
...based on a detailed analysis of local police incident reports (calls for service) covering 551 Wal-Mart stores in 434 cities and 30 states.5 The stores were chosen randomly based on a sample of 1,004 Wal-Mart stores that were open for all of 2004.6 The primary findings of this study are based only on the police reports associated with these 551 stores.
It's a large sample size if it's completely random, but I'm not at all convinced that it is.Not to mention 551 stores out of 3500 is a really large sample size. We use polls of 1000 people to figure out how 100 million will vote!
Sorry, we have no data for Wal-Mart stores within 100 miles of L2A 5W7. Please write your local police department and request a report.
To have our researchers analyze the data from your nearest Wal-Mart store, forward an official crime report to:
WakeUpWalMart.com
1775 K St NW
Washington, D.C. 20006
Originally posted by: Mike
Originally posted by: Fayd
my walmart isnt listed in that site.
Score 1 for Poway! We're so uppity, we dont even have crime!
lmao, I hate the Poway Target...or at least that shopping center.