Why kill him when you know the police know quite a bit about you and will rain storm on you? Isn't there a smarter way other than letting your anger control your response?
That's why you fire him. Any sensitive information's already been passed along, and his disappearance will make life hard for you.
When drug dealers "fire" you, it's usually at you, with some slugs, in the back of the head, in a back alley...
That would be a dumb way of handling it. If that's the route you chose to take, an "accident" would be better.
My point is this is a criminal enterprise. You don't just fire people and expect things to be good between the two of you. If they know a lot then you dispose of them. If they don't, you whip their ass and threaten to kill them or their family or you chase them out of town.
The problem "employee" isn't a standard associate though. It's a cop, and if anything bad happens to him, it'll bring a shit storm down on yourself. There's nothing to be gained by killing him, so the best thing is to let him go. If you really wanted to kill him, an arranged accident is better, so there's some doubt as to your involvement.
Right, but, again, this is a criminal organization where trust is in short supply. If you let him walk out of there, he will return with his police buddies. Therefore, isn't it better to bribe him or for you to skip town? What's the point of simply letting him go when it means he'll return to have the honor of putting the bracelets on you?
I refuse to help you finish your shitty screenplay.
OK fine, here is one idea: Make the mole, played by John Leguazamo(sp), give you oral for a week.
Then shoot him in the face. (not while giving you oral, could turn out bad)
This is your only post since you joined in September 2008? This?Give the hot shot a Pop Quiz.