Not only would that be incredibly stupid, but I am betting you would be looking at jail time for inciting, and if someone happens to get hurt in the process, civil suits as well.
Heck, you might not even make it out of there depending on the crowd.
Yeah. But would make for some interesting analysis (have variety of people that look different, race/gender/clothing/appearance/etc, and also speak different languages and see how people react).
Listing terrorist groups from 10+ years ago is pretty immaterial to the point that the predominant language of terrorism TODAY is Arabic.
It is not at all because what constitutes terrorism is quite arbitrary (the oft used "one man's freedom fighter is another's terrorist"). When we were using it as reason for overthrowing governments and installing favorable dictators, terrorists used to be mostly Marxist/Communist (with Arab revolutionary groups having a strong showing as well as justification for us propping up dictators there). Also, it is very material because we're seeing some of the telltale signs that often precursor massive scale terrorism occurring.
Again, that
isn't true today. I am not disputing that there are a lot of terrorists that do, but there is a lot of other terrorism going on in the world. The drug cartels being another prominent one and the various government managed terrorism (a lot of that is in Arab/Muslim countries too to be fair). You can squabble over it technically meeting the definition of terrorism used by various political affiliations, but it fits the literal definition and the results are no different.
Just because I'm disputing that Islamic extremist group terrorism is the vast majority of terrorism does not mean I'm saying it is fine. It definitely needs to be addressed, but the methods that some people are clamoring for are just going to make us bad guys as well. And it is fueling and being fueled by xenophobic fearmongering, which can lead to much darker places.
I'd even argue the specifics of the language and religion are the most immaterial aspects of this even, and its more about how ideology can influence and escalate things. We see similar actions from people of wide varieties and spectrums of ideologies. How and why do people fall into that? What fuels some people to become extremists? And what causes it to escalate that to terrorism?
For these muslims that you mention, their religious bigotry fuels the justification of killing as many Americans as they can. Which makes all non muslim people very nervous when they hear arabic on a plane because the plane itself has been a favorite muslim fundamentalist venue of homicide .
Anyone thinking it is unreasonable to disavow an arab speaking troublemaker on a plane is uninformed. Fool us once and shame on us, fool us twice and fuck you. That's the meaning of "Islamophobia".
Well actually us killing them by the thousands should provide plenty of justification (if its good enough for us, why shouldn't it be for them?). They just use their unique translation of their religion to absolve themselves of guilt for their methods (although in reality they really don't have much choice, their only option to attack is to use the methods they have been; and actually they often aren't attacking us, just taking credit for random crazy spree killers).
The issue is that for some people, the act of speaking Arabic is considered troublemaking. Also a problem is that people only seem to really give a shit about the terrorism being perpetrated by them when it is against us or similar countries (see the disparity in reporting of attacks that have happened in the US/Europe to elsewhere), when by and large the victims of Islamic extremists are other Arabs and Muslims. And that matters because it has blinded us to how our actions are actually creating a feedback loop. But much like how we refuse to accept our war on drugs to be a total failure and helping fuel the most negative parts of it, we're doing the exact same thing with the war on terror. And a big part of that is letting baseless fear grip us and let us be manipulated by politicians using it for their own personal gain while they make the problem worse.