JujuFish asked Greenman to ignore the insults. You are justifying them by posting this claim. But in my opinion your claim would only make sense if Greenman were consciously doing that.
My guess is that as a conservative Greenman has more areas if conservatives that are important to him than you do, so you can’t as easily comprehend where he is coming from as he can comprehend you. You are poo pooing values that have functioned for hundreds of thousands of years that have helped humanity survive.
Those values are real. They are worthy of respect. You are putting him down for having them. I think that is improper moral behavior. He would be morally objectionable if he consciously aims to harm you at his own expense. I think he is likely doing just that but not with conscious intent but because he does not see what we do. Your aim, in my opinion would be better served, in my opinion, if you had some respect for people who have more areas of moral concerns than you do and just argue with them as to what you see they get wrong about how they misunderstand their own moral beliefs. He isn’t Evelyn, he is wrong in his application of those beliefs.
Trump spouts all kinds of conservative moral beliefs but trump has only one real concern and it’s having the power to satisfy his lusts.
It isn’t enough to hold moral ideals. You need to understand them and apply them properly as well.
Read up on ‘moral concerns Jonathan Haidt”.
We've been over this before but I don't think you've actually been listening, so we can do it again:
"Those values are real. They are worthy of respect." Those values are not real. If they were real, they would be worthy of respect, but they are not real.
A lot has happened since Haidt published that has exposed conservatives for the lying, deceitful garbage that they are to their core. What Haidt showed is that conservatives are willing to claim they care about a larger number of "values," not that they actually care about them. They care about them when it is convenient, and immediately stop caring about them when caring becomes inconvenient. That is not caring. That is lying and manipulation.
Just one of thousands of examples: Conservatives cared about the economy under Jimmy Carter. They did not care that he was a moral man. Conservatives cared about family values when Bill Clinton was painting Monica Lewinsky's dress. They cared when he smoked cigars that she stowed in her humidor. Sexual deviancy mattered more than the strong economy we enjoyed under Clinton, but the opposite was true for Carter. Then Trump comes along. Surprise, sexual deviancy is no longer an issue, AT ALL. What matters is how good Trump is for the economy. Conservatives tell Haidt they care about the economy and they care about sexual deviants. +2 points for conservatives per Haidt. They've shown since then that they care about neither when applied to their team. They only "care" when it is a useful hammer to hit a Democrat. That isn't caring about an issue. It is only caring about hurting "the other."
So now that we can observe that the values are not real, we can conclude that they are also not worthy of respect.