Zeitgeist, The Movie 2007

Page 9 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

IceBergSLiM

Lifer
Jul 11, 2000
29,932
3
81
Originally posted by: bonkers325
Originally posted by: Feneant2

My own personal favorite was the 9/11 section. I've always asked myself how much of a pansy you would have to be that a few guys with box cutters could take over a plane and crash it into buildings without people doing anything... And no offense to Americans but seeing the 'we want your oil' war that resulted from it under the chemical weapons guise, I believe that 9/11 was a setup today more than ever.

a few guys with box cutters? you mean a few guys with box cutters who are ready to die for their cause. people can be pretty dangerous when they have nothing to lose and everything to gain.

and 9/11 wasnt demolished with explosives - whether or not it was setup by the government (although highly improbable), we might never know. people that have no knowledge of basic structural mechanics will not understand why the building fell. there have been various structural models done by reputable engineering firms that confirm and simulate the collapse mechanisms that caused the WTC to pancake.

how did they explain the explosions in the basment sub-structure of the building
 

IceBergSLiM

Lifer
Jul 11, 2000
29,932
3
81
Originally posted by: Aikouka
Originally posted by: manowar821
Think about how difficult and complicated it would been to get THREE planes to crash into well populated and also protected airspace. You think that's "simple"? Wow.

I don't think the WTC was even in an airspace much less a protected one. There are plenty of airspaces around where the WTC is, but I don't think any are protected.

You missed the part of the video where miraculously the air force interceptors stood down for 45 minutes after the first hi jack alert.....wierd coincidence....NOT. Im sure they haxor'd the compooters.
 

clamum

Lifer
Feb 13, 2003
26,252
403
126
I stopped watching this when it came to the 9/11 part and I saw stuff from Loose Change in there. Hahahaha. Loose Change. Hahahaha.
 

Aikouka

Lifer
Nov 27, 2001
30,383
912
126
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
You missed the part of the video where miraculously the air force interceptors stood down for 45 minutes after the first hi jack alert.....wierd coincidence....NOT. Im sure they haxor'd the compooters.

I haven't even watched the video nor did I say anything to that effect. I'm merely fixing this misinformation that there's even an airspace where the WTC was... because there isn't one nor is there a protected one near it .
 

IceBergSLiM

Lifer
Jul 11, 2000
29,932
3
81
Originally posted by: Aikouka
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
You missed the part of the video where miraculously the air force interceptors stood down for 45 minutes after the first hi jack alert.....wierd coincidence....NOT. Im sure they haxor'd the compooters.

I haven't even watched the video nor did I say anything to that effect. I'm merely fixing this misinformation that there's even an airspace where the WTC was... because there isn't one nor is there a protected one near it .

Doesn't matter. They track all commercial flights regardless of where they are flying for hi jacks.
 

manowar821

Diamond Member
Mar 1, 2007
6,063
0
0
Originally posted by: Aikouka
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
You missed the part of the video where miraculously the air force interceptors stood down for 45 minutes after the first hi jack alert.....wierd coincidence....NOT. Im sure they haxor'd the compooters.

I haven't even watched the video nor did I say anything to that effect. I'm merely fixing this misinformation that there's even an airspace where the WTC was... because there isn't one nor is there a protected one near it .

It's not misinformation, I never said that they had a special protected air space associated with the WTC. What I meant to say was that their airspace was as protected as any other metropolis in the USA, there are airbases that can scramble fighters into the air very quickly... IcebergSlim is exactly right.
 

Aikouka

Lifer
Nov 27, 2001
30,383
912
126
Originally posted by: manowar821
It's not misinformation, I never said that they had a special protected air space associated with the WTC. What I meant to say was that their airspace was as protected as any other metropolis in the USA, there are airbases that can scramble fighters into the air very quickly... IcebergSlim is exactly right.

Protected to me means restricted. You may want to choose your words a bit more carefully next time .

Also he isn't right because I never watched the movie so I couldn't have possibly missed a part :laugh:. I did actually intend on checking it out but forgot the name.

EDIT: "me" not "mean" .
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,358
8,447
126
Originally posted by: QueBert
I'm interested in these so called lies, I watched this, and from what I remember part 2 was 99% strung together clips from legit media like ABC/CNN/MSNBC. Are they lies because you don't believe them? Nothing has been proven, and while I'm not going to take an amature movie maker over the government. The movie definitely made some good points.

The only fact I know is planes flew into the buildings, outside of that it's just hearsay from the government. Do I think Bush ordered this? Nope, but they (our government) has done a piss poor job convincing me they actually know who was behind it. My biggest beef is with the Pentagon crash, why won't they release either of the videos - the one from the Gas Station & the one from the building. They had no problem, well I guess I should say no choice in the WTC videos because people on the street were filming them. But, they have real video of what happened at the Pentagon and all we get is "yeah, this is what happened" so me the damn video so I can see. I don't believe the plane vaporized that's dumb...

the plane didn't vaporize. there were parts of it all over the place. any 9/11 myth debunking site like loosechangeguide.com or 911myths.com will show you that. anyone claiming the plane that hit the pentagon vaporized or vanished is flat out lying. anyone who claims anything other than the american airlines flight hit the pentagon is flat out lying. they're lies because they are absolute fabrications that are easily disproven with evidence from reliable sources.
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
just sent a friend of min who is a hard core christian the vid.

her response... "yea whatever. Glad my beliefs are a relationship with God and the bible, pretty simple. "
 

Crono

Lifer
Aug 8, 2001
23,720
1,502
136
Originally posted by: vhx
I thought it was entertaining, a lot of the religion stuff seems to be innacurate. (Came across this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7-TqjTm5fgs

The other parts are good watches though, even if they are just food for thought.

Fixed link for the video. I watched that YouTube response video, and he successfully points out many of the flawed arguments, partial truths, and outright lies that are in the anti-Christian segment of Zeitgeist. What little truth there is in that entire movie is to strengthen all the lies so that people are more likely to believe. It's easy to point to some video on the internet and say, "See! I told you these things were conspiracies!", but it doesn't prove anything. Investigate the primary sources of evidence, and don't just believe people presenting one side of an argument and misusing and misinterpreting secondary or even tertiary sources.

In other words, if you really want to know the truth, don't be a lazy internet know-it-all pointing to videos that a 12 year old can debunk, but get off your butt and investigate things for yourself. Don't expect the truth to just fall in your lap or stream itself to your PC monitor. All things that are truly valuable need hard work in order to be acquired, and the truth is no different.
 

BeauJangles

Lifer
Aug 26, 2001
13,941
1
0
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
You missed the part of the video where miraculously the air force interceptors stood down for 45 minutes after the first hi jack alert.....wierd coincidence....NOT. Im sure they haxor'd the compooters.

Originally posted by: manowar821

It's not misinformation, I never said that they had a special protected air space associated with the WTC. What I meant to say was that their airspace was as protected as any other metropolis in the USA, there are airbases that can scramble fighters into the air very quickly... IcebergSlim is exactly right.

On September 11th, NORAD had somewhere around 15 aircraft on emergency standby across the United States. These aircraft were traditionally kept at-the-ready to intercept foreign threats flying into American airspace. 15 aircraft, by the way, was not unusually low or abnormal.

On that day, NORAD received four calls from air traffic control on September 11th. Prior to these calls they had no way of knowing there were hijacked planes in the air.

Three calls originated from an FAA administration site in Boston. Two of these calls incorrectly reported (first) that Flight 11 was headed to Washington, DC and (second that a Delta flight had been hijacked. The Flight 11 call was received after the plane had slammed into the North Tower. The third call came at 8:37 am and correctly reported that Flight 11 had been hijacked.

The other call came from the New York FAA office and reported that Flight 175 had also been hijacked. By the time the FAA had dialed NORAD, 175 had already hit the South Tower.

Looking back at NORAD reports, they scrambled fighters from the nearest available bases within minutes of receiving the hijacking calls. F15s took off from Otis AFB in Falmouth, MA and F16s took off from Langley Air National Guard Base in VA.

Why didn't NORAD 'know' the planes were hijacked prior to the phone calls? In 2001, NORAD was an antiquated organization. It was only concerned with threats from abroad - aircraft, missiles, whatever coming across the Atlantic or Pacific Oceans and attack targets within the United States. No NORAD radar tracked domestic flights inside the US and NORAD could only be made aware of hijackings via the FAA.

To make things more complicated, the hijackers turned off the planes transponders (which communicate to air traffic control the plane's designation). Once the FAA realized the planes were hijacked, they had to then search through thousands of radar spots to find the two missing planes. Hence why they were unaware the planes had slammed into the towers.

Originally posted by: IcebergSlimDoesn't matter. They track all commercial flights regardless of where they are flying for hi jacks.

Like i said above, this was NOT true on or before September 11, 2001. NORAD did NOT track ANY flights within the United States. Only after September 11th, when they realized that civilian aircraft could pose a significant threat to national security, did NORAD establish better FAA communications, establish better interceptor coverage, and install radar to monitor flights within the country.

By NORAD's own admission they did not have the capability to track or intercept the hijacked flights on 9/11. So, we're at a crossroads. You can either believe the organization whose ineptitude and lack of preparedness ensured that no planes would be ready to handle a rogue, hijacked plane, or you can continue to believe they are all-powerful, able to do anything. The evidence, unfortunately, points to the former, not the latter case.
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
Originally posted by: TipsyMcStagger
So why aren't the makers of this film dead yet? I mean they're "exposing" organizations with huge power who according to the film have no problem killing people to accomplish their goals (9/11), but they can't manage to silence a couple of amateur film makers?

They don't need to as no one believes the truth 9 times out of 10 once the news runs a false story.

This is witnessed everyday for those that made big headlines but later were acquitted.

 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |