These seem relatively high. I know all OC is "nothing is guaranteed" but at what voltages can one expect serious degradation?
These seem relatively high. I know all OC is "nothing is guaranteed" but at what voltages can one expect serious degradation?VSOC @ 1.2-1.3v
CLDO_VDDIO @ 1.15
CPU VDDIO @ 1.435v
Above all the voltages ive listedat what voltages can one expect serious degradation?
Apologies for a very naive question, but does anybody know (ideally actually tried) to install Windows Server 2012 R2 on Turin ideally or failing that consumer on Zen 5, did that work?
Server 2019 supports Epyc 9000 series so it will work with Zen 4 and maybe even 5. Before that, I guess hard to know without trying.
There is a separate turin thread that you may want to watch or post in, but I don't think anyone here has a working one yet. Markfw is trying, but so far the motherboards don't like his ES CPU.It sure does (as it's still in support window), but it also has got per-core pricing (no thanks!), where as good old Win2012R2 is licensed by the socket (as things ought to be for OSes)
If anybody got access to released Turin and half an hour of time to try this install then I'd be happy to pay some mutually agreed amount for the effort - I am wondering if it will refuse to install (seems unlikely) or just install but claim unknown generic CPU (which might be fine).
Exactly. The Gigabyte that advertised it was Turin compatible did nothing, not one single screen, like it was dead. The supermicro boots into BMC, but no bios post screen of any kind. Asrocking coming today, but the PSU for it (its a strange setup) comes Sunday, so we will see. I don't have $8000 for a retail Turin. I don't get Data center discounts.There is a separate turin thread that you may want to watch or post in, but I don't think anyone here has a working one yet. Markfw is trying, but so far the motherboards don't like his ES CPU.
Question - Zen 5 Turin builders thread.
OK, only CPU change on a Genoa build, but due to budget, thats first. The CPU (an ES) was not cheap. Stuck at 4800 on memory, but at least I have 12 channels. The final with be DDR5 ECC registered 6000.forums.anandtech.com
No, but 2x48GB of DDR5-6400 with Hynix easily runs 6000 CL28 without difficulty. I don't have anything that would exceed 96GB. Yet. That's Threadripper territory anyways...Does any one of you have actual experience running 9900X or 9950X rigs (24/7 "gamer" stable) with 128GB or 192GB of memory?
There is some info out there, but it's quite fragmented, like this thread:
AMD DDR5 OC And 24/7 Daily Memory Stability Thread
www.overclock.net
Or this.
So are my assumptions correct that for doing actual work 96GB is the practical limit? It seems 96GB with 2 dual rank DIMMs is the only thing that's reasonably stable and can even use EXPO with minimal fanfare.
With 4 dual rank dimms one's only (semi-) guaranteed 3600 MT/s, right? Anything higher is not guaranteed and would mean 10+ minute training times on boot and hours of tedious testing using custom timings?
Has anyone actually tried it, or has some extra info to share?
What is the max PPT it hits under 105W Eco mode? Say during Cinebench MT.
Does anybody happen to know if A620 boards offer an explicit PPT setting in their BIOSes? (ASRock and/or ASUS specifically; on my watch list as they have ECC memory support…)Max PPT hits 142W under 105W ECO mode. If you do manual PBO you can set PPT to 105W and it will stay at 105W if you prefer.
So i'm back from work and have had some time to test ASUS's new "Core Tunings Config for Gaming" feature
Results are a little of a mixed bag
I flashed from bios 2505 @ agesa 1.2.02A to bios 2604 @ agesa 1.2.02B and configured my known to be fully stable 8200/2233 memory-profile
Some general observations:
- "Core Tunings Config for Gaming" AUTO = legacy mode *edit* Getting different feedback from ppl reporting auto = level 1/2 for them, dont know why its different
- Aida is getting less read and higher copy, while write stays the same, compared to agesa 1.2.02A
AIDA64 latency results:
- AUTO (legacy) = getting the best latency in aida as expected
- Level 1 = same aida latency as 1.2.02A
- Level 2 = same aida latency as "level 1"
Clams cache/memory benchnark:
- AUTO (legacy) = scoring the same as older agesa 1.2.0.0
- Level 1 = scoring the same as older agesa 1.2.0.0
- Level 2 = = scoring the same as agesa 1.2.0.0A (highest numbers)
Karhu mb/s:
- AUTO (legacy) = getting the least mb/s
- Level 1 = setting a new high, have never seen upwards 256mb/s max numbers in only 3 min runtime
- Level 2 = the same as agesa 1.2.0.0A
So each of these different settings have their own strong suit.. And we are back to ppl have to test their specific game/benchmark to decide whats best for them in their application -> there are no universal answer for "best settings"
Core Tunings Config for Gaming = AUTO (legacy)
View attachment 112546
Core Tunings Config for Gaming = Level 1
View attachment 112547
Core Tunings Config for Gaming = Level2
View attachment 112548
Does anybody happen to know if A620 boards offer an explicit PPT setting in their BIOSes? (ASRock and/or ASUS specifically; on my watch list as they have ECC memory support…)
The option should be available otherwise they should have a disclaimer saying that not all options are available on all mobos. I think ASROCK is generally more trustworthy when it comes to these things. I personally don't think anyone here would go for A620. There's apparently a stigma attached to it as being so cheap it's crap, at least as far as mobo VRMs are concerned.I actually did RTFM before asking. :-) Unfortunately, this is a combined X670/B650/A620/A620A manual, and it is not evident to me whether or not all of the options described (here: AMD CBS options) are available on A620 boards too.
Wouldn't ECO mode in Ryzen Master accomplish that?Edit, WRT VRMs, my use case of the PPT limit setting in the BIOS would be to lower it from the default, not to raise it. :-)