- Mar 3, 2017
- 1,687
- 6,235
- 136
I think the emulation works pretty well. You can play Steam games but obviously the performance may not be always great.Can you play Steam games on It?
No.I think the emulation works pretty well
WoW64 doesn't support AVX or anything useful.You can play Steam games but obviously the performance may not be always great.
Unfortunately it will come with a price to match. I was looking at relatively "cheap" laptops with 4090. The cheapest one that I can actually afford (if I'm super desperate to part with money) is a 13900HX ASUS laptop. Ryzen HX laptops with 4090 are way overpriced. By keeping these laptops out of the price range of gamers, AMD is making sure that a significant number of gamers stay Intel fans for the foreseeable future and never get to experience the better performance/lesser heat output/lower power consumption of a Ryzen.That sounds beastly.
WoW64 doesn't support AVX or anything useful.
And unless Phoenix/Oryon has a TSO switch, the mem perf gonna get hammered with memory consistency model emulation.
Did you reply to the wrong comment?Unfortunately it will come with a price to match. I was looking at relatively "cheap" laptops with 4090. The cheapest one that I can actually afford (if I'm super desperate to part with money) is a 13900HX ASUS laptop. Ryzen HX laptops with 4090 are way overpriced. By keeping these laptops out of the price range of gamers, AMD is making sure that a significant number of gamers stay Intel fans for the foreseeable future and never get to experience the better performance/lesser heat output/lower power consumption of a Ryzen.
FEX-emu supports AVX instructions starting last year.WoW64 doesn't support AVX or anything useful.
And unless Phoenix/Oryon has a TSO switch, the mem perf gonna get hammered with memory consistency model emulation.
Did you reply to the wrong comment?
The Strix Halo with 40 CU isn't going to be anywhere near RTX 4090 performance.
By keeping these laptops out of the price range of gamers, AMD is making sure that a significant number of gamers stay Intel fans for the foreseeable future and never get to experience the better performance/lesser heat output/lower power consumption of a Ryzen.
If those chips are so expensive, why SFF PCs based on those chips are dirt cheap: 649-749$ for a config with 32 GB of RAM and 512 GB SSD to 1 TB SSD?By keeping these laptops out of the price range of gamers, AMD is making sure that a significant number of gamers stay Intel fans for the foreseeable future and never get to experience the better performance/lesser heat output/lower power consumption of a Ryzen.
Price isn’t first on everyone’s list. Give me a thin/light that is great at productivity workloads and can play my favorite games at decent quality/framerate and i am willing to pay through the nose.Unfortunately it will come with a price to match. I was looking at relatively "cheap" laptops with 4090. The cheapest one that I can actually afford (if I'm super desperate to part with money) is a 13900HX ASUS laptop. Ryzen HX laptops with 4090 are way overpriced. By keeping these laptops out of the price range of gamers, AMD is making sure that a significant number of gamers stay Intel fans for the foreseeable future and never get to experience the better performance/lesser heat output/lower power consumption of a Ryzen.
Not true. AMD dictates the pricing of the components they make. In most countries, AMD and/or it’s distributors can dictate a minimum selling price as part of a sales contract. Many companies do this to keep street pricing from falling off a cliff.AMD has nothing to do with laptops pricings, it s the OEMs decision, for some reason they target way bigger profits with 7X40/7X45 APUs/CPUs.
Small form factor.What is SFF?
My point was, if the specs are good, it won't be affordable compared to some Intel laptop offering with dGPU. So it being a beast is kinda moot for the majority of us, other than getting excited at the benchmarks. Intel spams the market with so many laptops that you are bound to find one that meets your needs at the price that seems good to you, rather than finding a comparable Ryzen laptop.Did you reply to the wrong comment?
Those OEMs are hurting AMD's market share and mind share. AMD needs to have a serious talk with them. It's like the OEMs are deliberately swaying consumers towards their cheaper Intel models.Its OEMs which set the prices for those products. The chips are dirt cheap.
AMD has nothing to do with laptops pricings, it s the OEMs decision, for some reason they target way bigger profits with 7X40/7X45 APUs/CPUs.
It's nice you can, ig, but most people actually do care about budgets since they don't have unlimited money :/Price isn’t first on everyone’s list. Give me a thin/light that is great at productivity workloads and can play my favorite games at decent quality/framerate and i am willing to pay through the nose.
Obviously?Not true. AMD dictates the pricing of the components they make.
So why bring it up lolNote that I am not saying AMD specifically does this,
That's just soooo disingenuousAre you telling us the CPUs are for free?
Are you telling us the CPUs are for free?
Until you remember video games are a thing!AVX is optional feature, nice to have
Why do you expect the difference to be diminishing? As SRAM is not shrinking at all cache sizes won't move as much as it used to either. And as long as that doesn't change much X3D even with just one 64MB layer will continue to add a lot to the total cache available.I'm guessing the X3D layer on Z5 will stay similar to Z3 and Z4 given how its more difficult to shrink, and then we could probably some diminishing returns between vanilla and X3D performance eventually.
Until you remember video games are a thing!
I'm guessing the X3D layer on Z5 will stay similar to Z3 and Z4 given how its more difficult to shrink, and then we could probably some diminishing returns between vanilla and X3D performance eventually.
0.I wonder how many games will even officially support Windows on Arm
Ehhh, fatter ROBs can cope with worse memory setups just fine.a cache miss is more costly on higher performing core than on lower performing core.